• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

alignment spec?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ban-one
  • Start date Start date Mar 9, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

ban-one

Member
Mar 30, 2005
59
0
6
ny
Mar 9, 2007
#1
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #1
took my gt to local FOMOCO dealer to get front end alligned after install f/r new struts,shocks and h@r SS springs ...this is what he gave me for specs. when they went to do alignment and set camber at -1 degree.

left right
cm -1.4 cm -1.0
cs 3.2 cs 3.3
toe .07 toe .07

tech said i def need the c/c plates for the front of car... anyone know what a good reliable brand that dont cost 400 bucks are? what about the upr products shark ones? do i need 4 bolt or 3 bolt? its for a 2000 gt
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 9, 2007
#2
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #2
Maximum Motorsports, accept no others.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Mar 9, 2007
#3
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #3
bdcardinal said:
Maximum Motorsports, accept no others.
Click to expand...

You can search the internet for a better answer but you won't find one.
 

ban-one

Member
Mar 30, 2005
59
0
6
ny
Mar 9, 2007
#4
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #4
figured that would be the universal answer....
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Mar 9, 2007
#5
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #5
Maximum Motorsports...$200..
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Mar 9, 2007
#6
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #6
Looking at those numbers, they look within specs. I won't know until I get home on Monday but I have a printout with acceptable specs.
 

ban-one

Member
Mar 30, 2005
59
0
6
ny
Mar 9, 2007
#7
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #7
said if he tried to adjust towards -1 deg it would burn the right inner tire up. he even printed me out a pic of the steeda c/c plates to show me what i need.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Mar 9, 2007
#8
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #8
I was looking through my old post. If CS on that is caster, then the range is 2.5* to 4.0*. I have 4.1 on my stang and haven't had any odd tire wear or anything. Hasn't caused any issues either.

The caster/camber plates aren't necessary because you caster looked within spec. If they're bitching about the camber, they can fix that with the stock plates. Caster is the only thing NOT adjustable from the factory. It's hit or miss with it.

DerekStangGT said:
i would strongly suggest you got the C/C plates if you have the money. if youre broke as poopy, you dont have a choice, but i would strongly suggest them. from the factory, caster isnt adjustable. its basically a hit or miss thing. its ok if its a little off, not too big a deal since caster isnt a wearing angle like toe and camber. if you really want some good handling, have the guy doing the alignment give you some negative camber. ive got 1.4* on my front tires and i could really feel a difference in the turns. i wouldnt go any more than ~1.5 though b/c then it starts to take it's toll on your inner tires.
Click to expand...

Link to my old post: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=539831
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Mar 9, 2007
#9
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #9
Oh, and 4 bolt
http://www.americanmuscle.com/maximum-motorsports-caster-camber-plates-94-04.html
 

ban-one

Member
Mar 30, 2005
59
0
6
ny
Mar 9, 2007
#10
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #10
ford tech kept talking about his 88 gt needing them...but i never seen the car around...he might of been talking about how one adjustment was -1 like i wanted and he cant get the other one any less than -1.4 so i dont know thats why i have u guys on stangnet:SNSign:
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 10, 2007
#11
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #11
caster is not a tire wearing angle. it just causes pull when its out side to side. also with more caster your car will be more controllable at higher speed. a lot of german cars run 9 or more degrees of caster.
 

ban-one

Member
Mar 30, 2005
59
0
6
ny
Mar 10, 2007
#12
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #12
well all i can think of is that the ford factory machine does not have the tollerances for a aftermarket lowered car.does anyone have the specs where a lowered car should be set at to get good tire wear and better steering performance.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 10, 2007
#13
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #13
i set all the cars that come into my shop to -0.4 camber on both sides and run as much caster as i can get with a -0.5 offset. toe is set to factory spec. this will give you much better tire wear
 

steveb24

New Member
Nov 28, 2005
555
0
0
wilmington, DE
Mar 10, 2007
#14
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #14
ill chime in..

ive had h&r ss and the prokit installed, pro kit is what i have now..

after both installs i had an alightment done, and both times the alignment came out "easily within spec" so i was told, so no u dont need them and dont waste your money
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 10, 2007
#15
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #15
i'd get them anyway. they will be a big help in the future.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 11, 2007
#16
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #16
I got my car aligned by Sears because they were the only place open on a sunday. Big mistake!!!! Here are what they set mine at.

Camber.. Caster..
Left . -0.2 4.6 deg
Right. -1.1 5.2 deg

These specs didn't make my tires wear funny or anything, but it definately isn't good for handling. On top of that you can tell just by looking at my car that the camber is different from side to side. Anyway, I am adding some steeda X2 balljoints & bumpsteer kit tomorrow, so i will need an alignment soon. When i do, i am gonna find a place to give me the specs that Maximum Motorsports gave me. Here are the specs

Camber Caster
Left. -1.5 5 deg.
Right. -1.5 5.25 deg.

They said these specs would give me good street handling, but also preserve my tires for a while. I trust them more then Sears, or Les Schwab....I dont daily drive my car anyway so I would rather have a semi aggressive setting for better handling.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 11, 2007
#17
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #17
steveb24 said:
ill chime in..

ive had h&r ss and the prokit installed, pro kit is what i have now..

after both installs i had an alightment done, and both times the alignment came out "easily within spec" so i was told, so no u dont need them and dont waste your money
Click to expand...

U sure, because fords stock components dont adjust very far. Even with C/C plates I was told by these alignment places that they couldnt get my car perfectly in spec. I just think they were idiots not knowing how to correctly align a car with plates. They said my negative camber was maxed out on the right side, but it looked like the plate had plenty of adjustment left. My left camber isnt even within spec.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 11, 2007
#18
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #18
This might be a stupid question. When u look at your alignment print out, and they say left or right. They mean from inside the car right? Or do they mean from the machine's point of veiw.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Mar 11, 2007
#19
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #19
EPIKGT said:
U sure, because fords stock components dont adjust very far. Even with C/C plates I was told by these alignment places that they couldnt get my car perfectly in spec. I just think they were idiots not knowing how to correctly align a car with plates. They said my negative camber was maxed out on the right side, but it looked like the plate had plenty of adjustment left. My left camber isnt even within spec.
Click to expand...

No one can give you an exact answer, these cars came from the factory with the chassis all screwed up, it is the same way with the rear of the car when you will do adjustments to it. Alignment issues with certain drops, Springs will have different drop heights, panhard and swaybars will touch or have space between the mounting points etc..
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 11, 2007
#20
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #20
tomustang said:
No one can give you an exact answer, these cars came from the factory with the chassis all screwed up, it is the same way with the rear of the car when you will do adjustments to it. Alignment issues with certain drops, Springs will have different drop heights, panhard and swaybars will touch or have space between the mounting points etc..
Click to expand...

How do those specs from Maximum Motorsports look to you?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Progress Thread 88 Notched Fox
  • NotchedGarage
  • Jul 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2024
Flyboy60
F
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
Suspension Alignment specs
  • 7991LXnSHO
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 10, 2021
7991LXnSHO
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?