• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Alil confused...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2vNotch
  • Start date Start date Jan 11, 2012

2vNotch

Active Member
Dec 6, 2011
519
21
29
Rogers, AR
Jan 11, 2012
#1
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #1
Mayb I'm puttin the too much thought into this!? I'm wanting to change the exhaust up on my 88 coupe that has an 02 2v motor (with factory manifolds on it) and a custom JUNK xpipe with dumped flows....So do i buy an h/x pipe for 79-93 or 99-04?? I was thinking they were year specific bc of the fit to the body, but then I thought well mayb the mount up to the factory manifolds diff, or will they even at all and do I get the h or the x?
Would also like to change my 373s to 410s 0r 430s...Which ones compliment the 2v/3650 trans combo better??
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jan 11, 2012
#2
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #2
You'll want an H/X pipe for a 99-04 2V. Any exhaust shop worth a damn will be able to make it work fine. I prefer the sound of an X pipe on mod motors and H pipe on pushrods, but it's all a matter of opinion. If you're going to drive this car on the street more than the dragstrip, I strongly recommend keeping the 3.73 gears. The maximum I'd go is to the 4.10s, but you'll sacrifice some cruising/highway manners.

PS-- Post up some pictures of your car. It looks pretty nice from your signature.
 

2vNotch

Active Member
Dec 6, 2011
519
21
29
Rogers, AR
Jan 11, 2012
#3
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #3
 

Attachments

  • Optimized-johns car 1.webp
    149.1 KB · Views: 125
  • Optimized-johns car 1.webp
    149.1 KB · Views: 110

2vNotch

Active Member
Dec 6, 2011
519
21
29
Rogers, AR
Jan 11, 2012
#4
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #4
1991notchbackLX said:
You'll want an H/X pipe for a 99-04 2V. Any exhaust shop worth a damn will be able to make it work fine. I prefer the sound of an X pipe on mod motors and H pipe on pushrods, but it's all a matter of opinion. If you're going to drive this car on the street more than the dragstrip, I strongly recommend keeping the 3.73 gears. The maximum I'd go is to the 4.10s, but you'll sacrifice some cruising/highway manners.

PS-- Post up some pictures of your car. It looks pretty nice from your signature.
Click to expand...
Can u xplain to me why the 99-04?
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jan 11, 2012
#5
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #5
If I remember correctly the hangers are in the same place, but someone may come in here and correct me. I'd be more worried about the exhaust manifolds matching up. It really is a crapshoot with exhaust fitment anyway. Any exhaust shop can make it work and will have to make modifications regardless. I had BBK longtubes and a MAC prochamber for longtubes and my exhaust shop had to make two adapter pieces for each pipe in order to make it work. It fit like complete . It's happened the same way on every exhaust install I've done since.
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Jan 11, 2012
#6
  • Jan 11, 2012
  • #6
Notchback is correct on the need for the 99-04 mid-pipe; the flanges from a fox body pipe won't mate to your 4.6 manifolds. The hangars are in a different location, but since they hang off the x-member/transmission, and you're running a 3650, it should with no or very little issue. All that being said, notchback is again correct that any exhaust shop worth a hoot will be able to fab up whatever is needed to hang it properly. The catback on the other hand...not totally sure-I'd probably buy the fox cat back and let the muffler shop deal with the welding and if they'll let you in the bay, tell them exactly what you want that way they can put it to your spec...

A little off subject here, but what k-member did you use in yours to swap to 4.6 and what length d/s did you use?

Good looking car btw-I like what you did with it!
 

2vNotch

Active Member
Dec 6, 2011
519
21
29
Rogers, AR
Jan 12, 2012
#7
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #7
txstang84 said:
Notchback is correct on the need for the 99-04 mid-pipe; the flanges from a fox body pipe won't mate to your 4.6 manifolds. The hangars are in a different location, but since they hang off the x-member/transmission, and you're running a 3650, it should with no or very little issue. All that being said, notchback is again correct that any exhaust shop worth a hoot will be able to fab up whatever is needed to hang it properly. The catback on the other hand...not totally sure-I'd probably buy the fox cat back and let the muffler shop deal with the welding and if they'll let you in the bay, tell them exactly what you want that way they can put it to your spec...

A little off subject here, but what k-member did you use in yours to swap to 4.6 and what length d/s did you use?

Good looking car btw-I like what you did with it!
Click to expand...
Thanks! 03 Gt kmember, not sure of the driveshaft length
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 12, 2012
#8
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #8
To add: If you are running stock exhaust manifolds, you might wanna correct that before you make any gear change. Forcing the engine to spin any harder through an RPM range w/ the stock constipators on there is kinda "horse before the water" if you ask me. And if you are intending to change the stock manifolds, might wanna do that before investing in any exhaust after that.
 

2vNotch

Active Member
Dec 6, 2011
519
21
29
Rogers, AR
Jan 12, 2012
#9
  • Jan 12, 2012
  • #9
The xpipe thats on it has multiple leaks, id b changing it mostly for that purpose.....Id love longtubes but the more I look at it im gnna b lucky to get ANYTHNG diff in there!! Pass side has room but the drivers side factory manifold dang near lays against that steering shaft
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
The "Extra Engine" Post....hmmm
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2020
Wayne Waldrep
J
1995 5.0 (originally v6) WIP... runs good but need input
  • jwk72
  • Feb 10, 2019
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
18
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 20, 2019
Chythar
  • Locked
Expired Tons Of New And Used Parts 94-04
  • Anthony Bonert
  • Mar 4, 2017
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 21, 2017
MonsterBoon
M
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?