• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Almost done hoarding..

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5point0stang88
  • Start date Start date Mar 27, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Mar 27, 2013
#1
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #1


Gt40p heads
Gt40 intake
Spintech Super Pro Streets exhaust dumped
Mac Prochamber mid pipe
Mac long tubes 1 5/8
Tfs1 cam
FRPP hardened pushrods
ARP bolts
MSD Street Fire 90deg wires
Comp Cams Magnum double roller chain and sprocket
FRPP gasket kit
Driveshaft bolts
Motor Mount nuts
ARP mount to block bolts
Duralast (AutoZone) mounts<~~ taking back and getting Prothane Motion Control polyurethane mounts. Are these good?



My car will be street only, does this sounds like it'll make a decent street car? 88 gt with t5.


.:Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Note II:.
 

Attachments

  • e6u4e7up.webp
    30.1 KB · Views: 151
  • e6u4e7up.webp
    30.1 KB · Views: 167
  • epequ2y8.webp
    26 KB · Views: 167
  • epequ2y8.webp
    26 KB · Views: 158

f8tlfiveo

My wife likes my spool and blow-off valve.
Aug 8, 2007
1,585
102
64
Lancaster, PA
Mar 27, 2013
#2
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #2
Prob 260-275 rwhp.. Low 13 -1/4 mile.. So yeah..
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Mar 27, 2013
#3
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #3
Thanks that will satisfy I bet. If I want more I'll get bigger/better heads and intake later

.:Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Note II:.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Mar 27, 2013
#4
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #4
Should be a fun street car. I've seen many gt40p combos dip decently into the 12's.
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88

newskool

Active Member
Oct 17, 2006
251
37
48
Fayetteville, NC
Mar 27, 2013
#5
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #5
All those parts in the house and on the carpet, you must be single. Congrats on the stockpile.
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88 and Mintsick

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 27, 2013
#6
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #6
From what I remember, the Prothane Engine mounts actually raise the engine by nearly and inch. Could be a hassle trying to get header/hood clearance. I went with the Energy Suspension units myself. They're dimensionally the same as stock, just made of urethane.
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Mar 27, 2013
#7
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #7
Thanks I just heard that on another board, I think I'm go with the Energy Suspension ones since I wanted the convertible style mount like I bought, but without the cheap build
And yes single haha thanks, but still when I wasn't I got away with having half that in the living room before she got tired of it lol



Other mounts I was looking at are these
http://www.americanmuscle.com/motor-mounts-8495.html

.:Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Note II:.
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Mar 27, 2013
#8
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #8
Nice!!!
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 27, 2013
#9
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #9
Get that stuff off the carpet! My OCD kicking in again.

You could always bolt a Vortech Supercharger on that later and make 425HP easily. No need to buy all that stuff over again.
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88, Noobz347 and Gearbanger 101

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,886
21,067
234
Box behind Walmart
Mar 27, 2013
#10
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #10
VibrantRedGT said:
Get that stuff off the carpet! My OCD kicking in again.

You could always bolt a Vortech Supercharger on that later and make 425HP easily. No need to buy all that stuff over again.
Click to expand...

Werd
 
Reactions: krazedstang and 5point0stang88

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Mar 27, 2013
#11
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #11
Yeah you're right... that's why I just now was thinking of staying 302 instead of doing a 351w and whatever route with that, cause I don't want to buy all over. Thanks
And the heads have cardboard under them but they are clean, and everything else is brand new lol!

.:Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Note II:.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Mar 27, 2013
#12
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #12
Nice pile of parts you have there. Sounds like a fun weekend worth of work..
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88 and stangboy

HuskerNation

Member
Nov 4, 2011
252
16
19
West Des Moines, IA/Omaha, NE
Mar 27, 2013
#13
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #13
What are you doing for trans mount if you don't mind me asking?

I bought these about 1/2 year ago... They are definitely worth the money, especially getting the trans mount with it.

http://www.blueovalindustries.com/engine/motormounts/en5250kit.html

And plans on suspension work? With that power, you might want to be able to put it to the ground
 

Illuminator

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
219
10
29
So. Cal
Mar 27, 2013
#14
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #14
Gearbanger 101 said:
From what I remember, the Prothane Engine mounts actually raise the engine by nearly and inch. Could be a hassle trying to get header/hood clearance. I went with the Energy Suspension units myself. They're dimensionally the same as stock, just made of urethane.
Click to expand...

I used the Energy Suspension Urethane trans mount, my motor mounts on the other hand look like home made units out of blocks of aluminum via PO.....lol seem to work so haven't messed with em yet!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 27, 2013
#15
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #15
Another vote for the Energy Suspension trans mount. No issues.
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
204
94
Arkansas
Mar 27, 2013
#16
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #16
Have you converted to MAF?
That TFS stage 1 will not work with speed density.

Also, on dads drag car, he had regular rubber motor mounts until he bought the Energy suspension motor mounts and tranny mount. The engine mounts along with the new tranny mount I guess raised or angled the engine enough to cause the long tubes to hit the floor boards when they previously didn't.
But on my car, they didn't raise the engine any at all compared to the rubber ones. I guess we have weird luck
I would still definitely go Energy Suspension mounts. They're really nice quality.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 28, 2013
#17
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #17
88LX5.Oh said:
Have you converted to MAF?
That TFS stage 1 will not work with speed density.

Also, on dads drag car, he had regular rubber motor mounts until he bought the Energy suspension motor mounts and tranny mount. The engine mounts along with the new tranny mount I guess raised or angled the engine enough to cause the long tubes to hit the floor boards when they previously didn't.
But on my car, they didn't raise the engine any at all compared to the rubber ones. I guess we have weird luck
I would still definitely go Energy Suspension mounts. They're really nice quality.
Click to expand...

I'll bet you anything that the mounts on your dads car were made by Prothane and not Energy Suspension. The Prothane Mounts are famous for raising the engine above stock height, the Prothan are built identical to the stock dimensions.
 

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Mar 28, 2013
#18
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #18
Thanks for the link on the blue oval, should it same quality as Energy?
Also using rubber trans mount right now.
I'm converted to MAF already, 70mm

.:Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Note II:.
 

HuskerNation

Member
Nov 4, 2011
252
16
19
West Des Moines, IA/Omaha, NE
Mar 28, 2013
#19
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #19
5point0stang88 said:
Thanks for the link on the blue oval, should it same quality as Energy?
Also using rubber trans mount right now.
I'm converted to MAF already, 70mm

.:Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Note II:.
Click to expand...

From the couple people I know who have these, they have had them for years and they are still as durable as when they were first bought. One set has been used for 8 years, on a 10sec Mustang.
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 28, 2013
#20
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #20
5point0stang88 said:
Thanks for the link on the blue oval, should it same quality as Energy?
Click to expand...

Look at the SKU number. They are Energy Suspension mounts.
 
Reactions: 5point0stang88
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Progress Thread 88 Notched Fox
  • NotchedGarage
  • Jul 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2024
Flyboy60
F
A
1991 5.0 with HCI - started car, running for a few minutes, started pushing coolant into the overflow tank and then puking out from there. I'm lost
  • AmericanMuscle4.6GT
  • Oct 16, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 30, 2022
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?