• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Any suggestions on heads/cam or top end for rebuild?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Golden80
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2004
G

Golden80

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
4
0
0
Jun 10, 2004
#1
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #1
I'm going to be rebuilding the 289 in my Mustang since it's blowing a lot of oil through the 7th cylinder. I would like to bump the power to around 300 hp if possible too. What heads/cam combos have some of you had luck with? Also, what intake and carb? I have about $1500-2000 to spend on parts and will have about the same to do the rebuild. Also, my current setup is a 100% stock D-code 289.

Thanks,
Matthew
 

65 fastback

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
1,347
0
37
Northern VA
Jun 10, 2004
#2
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #2
I'd go with the Edelbrock RPM package. It's already matched to work together. I think the 600 cfm carb, Edelbrock RPM intake, and the Edelbrock RPM cam make around 320 HP. If you can come up with the money for a set of heads, you should see 360+ rwhp.

Check out their website.

Good luck,
Tim
 
G

Golden80

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
4
0
0
Jun 10, 2004
#3
  • Jun 10, 2004
  • #3
My next question is would a Holley 600 cfm double pumper be enough carb for the RPM setup? I've had a brand new one sitting in the back of my garage for the past 5 years. I'm at high altitude too. (Denver, CO) I was wondering if I should go up to a 650, or maybe a Demon 625.

Thanks,
Matt
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Jun 11, 2004
#4
  • Jun 11, 2004
  • #4
65 fastback said:
I'd go with the Edelbrock RPM package. It's already matched to work together. I think the 600 cfm carb, Edelbrock RPM intake, and the Edelbrock RPM cam make around 320 HP. If you can come up with the money for a set of heads, you should see 360+ rwhp.

Check out their website.

Good luck,
Tim
Click to expand...

I am pretty sure the 360+ RWHP is a typo- thats about the most you will see at the b-assuming its perfectly tuned.

I have the RPM package w/ Trickflow heads & 750 carb. My car just dynoed at 275 RWHP & 269 RWTQ which is about 345HP at the crank or so. Needs some fine tuning, but I should be able to get another 10-20 more HP out of it.

My first combo before I put the heads on was in your budget -I had the block bored and a 3-angle valve job done on the stock heads -cost $700, a Summit rebuild kit with forged pistons - cost $350, Edelbrock rpm cam lifters & springs, intake, 750 carb, fuel & water pump, and timing chaine-all for about $750. I assembled and blueprinted everything myself -the motor cost less then $2,000. The car dynoed then at 230RWHP & 250RWTQ- just shy of 300 HP at the flywheel.


Add another $1300 for the heads and roller rockers on my current setup.
 

65 fastback

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
1,347
0
37
Northern VA
Jun 11, 2004
#5
  • Jun 11, 2004
  • #5
coolblue,
You're right, it should have read fwhp. I was just taking the specs off of the Edelbrock website. But I'm sure they had that engine tuned to the max.

Golden80,
The 600 should be good until you add some high flow heads.

Tim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
282
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
855
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
757
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
F
Best plugs for carb'd roller
  • forango
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 2, 2025
HotFox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?