• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Anyone seen any dyno number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter san~man
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Sep 10, 2006
#21
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #21
I think he would do over 300 with full bolt-ons, heads and cams.. I mean, if you look at the fully bolt-on PI 2V's with JUST CAMS, they're putting down right near 300rwhp with stock heads
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 10, 2006
#22
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #22
Do you have access to race fuel or maybe some octane booster to mix with the regular gas you get for free? Just a thought....
anyone have a chart to figure out how much 100 octane race gas or NOS octane boost you would need to bump 89 up to 91 or 93 octane...
if its not too much extra money that may be an option to run the supercharger. You get a free tank and maybe add $10-$15 of higher octane suppliment.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Sep 10, 2006
#23
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #23
oh yeah and about your original question i have seen @ a 50hp gain from heads and cams. I never did put mine on a dyno but when i went from just the plain PI swap to VT st2 heads/comp 262ah cams it was a nice gain...Some VT heads/Cams would definately add a smile to your face. Not as much as some VT heads/ VT blower cams and a KB though....
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Sep 10, 2006
#24
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #24
You should be able to run low octane gas with a blower...just not much timing, and very little boost

Why head/cam over vortech??? Nearly the same ammount of money after install (assuming you do vortech install yourself and have shop do head/cam) for half the power seems better...HOW?

Alot of people go with vortech blowers for a reason...they are great!
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Sep 10, 2006
#25
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #25
DropTopPony said:
Do you have access to race fuel or maybe some octane booster to mix with the regular gas you get for free? Just a thought....
anyone have a chart to figure out how much 100 octane race gas or NOS octane boost you would need to bump 89 up to 91 or 93 octane...
if its not too much extra money that may be an option to run the supercharger. You get a free tank and maybe add $10-$15 of higher octane suppliment.
Click to expand...

I have a can of Silkolene that a co-worker gave me and it seems to work fine so far.

I'd just hate to have to buy that crap for the rest of my car's lifetime. That and the fact that the cans are expensive is deterring my decision to go FI.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Sep 10, 2006
#26
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #26
BennyBlown2v said:
Why head/cam over vortech??? Nearly the same ammount of money after install (assuming you do vortech install yourself and have shop do head/cam) for half the power seems better...HOW?

Alot of people go with vortech blowers for a reason...they are great!
Click to expand...

I do realize that, but FI is a ticking timebomb. With my luck with my "Friday car," the motor would let go a month (or worse) after I installed the SC.

I haven't read many, if any, horror stories about H/C performance unless the cams weren't degreed when installed.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 10, 2006
#27
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #27
WIth a mongoose kit tuned for 89 octain, I wouldnt expect but about 330RWHP. Definatly wouldnt be double. Thats not a big increase...your car wouldnt run much better with a non ICd vs a N/A setup.
 

turbofreek

New Member
May 11, 2006
16
0
0
illinois
Sep 10, 2006
#28
  • Sep 10, 2006
  • #28
heres my watered down 89 octane turbo car on 6psi with foule driver side plugs
power is possible on 89octane
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 11, 2006
#29
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #29
Thats a 5.0 right? But turbo>FI hands down. 6PSI from a turbo > 8 PSI from a S/C generally.

Glad to see those are STD #s...SAE would probably had you up in the mid 400s due to elevation .

Nice #s though . Strong car you got there.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Sep 11, 2006
#30
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #30
Ok I gotta few ? here.
1. Stg 2 cams and heads need to be spun higher in the rpm's to make the increased power right? Like 6500 right? Is it jsut me or does that seem to be when the stock 2v bottom ends start letting go?
2. Wouldn't a H/C swap require a good tune? and Seeing as how most the power is found with playing with the timing and fuel curve wouldn't higher octane need be needed anyway?
3. Why don't you just pay for your gas like the rest of us?

Just my thoughts.
 

madmatt

Ellis Juan sympathizer
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2002
465
0
16
Lexington, SC
Sep 11, 2006
#31
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #31
My opinion, if you dont wanna do the 93 octane, leave the car as is. I would CONSTANTLY worry something was going to go wrong if I had a built car and was running it on just 89. Just me though...
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Sep 11, 2006
#32
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #32
BooWFO said:
Ok I gotta few ? here.
1. Stg 2 cams and heads need to be spun higher in the rpm's to make the increased power right? Like 6500 right? Is it jsut me or does that seem to be when the stock 2v bottom ends start letting go?
2. Wouldn't a H/C swap require a good tune? and Seeing as how most the power is found with playing with the timing and fuel curve wouldn't higher octane need be needed anyway?
3. Why don't you just pay for your gas like the rest of us?

Just my thoughts.
Click to expand...

Good points.

In reference to point #3, read post #16 above.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
905
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
967
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
365
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
73
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?