• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Argh... My new tires look small :(

  • Thread starter Thread starter babino
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

holler

Founding Member
Dec 5, 2000
332
0
0
Chicago
Apr 7, 2004
#21
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #21
time for another posting of the infamous Tire Calculator:

Tire Calculator
 

Gumby

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
21
0
0
Urbandale, IA.....for now!!!
Apr 7, 2004
#22
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #22
babino said:
For simplicity sake, would I be OK with just the Ford C springs? I heard that the camber is adjustable in the '03 GT so should this be all I need? Thanks!
Click to expand...

Yes, the stock camber has enough adjustment to make up for the drop from a C spring. Plus, with that small of a drop you can save some money and NOT buy new shocks and struts! I just tend to lean towards these because they're designed by the same people that designed the car!!!
 

babino

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
90
0
0
Apr 7, 2004
#23
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #23
Already used...

holler said:
time for another posting of the infamous Tire Calculator:

Tire Calculator
Click to expand...

I used this calculator every step of the way during my decision process. The problem I didn't take into account is the additional empty space in the wheel well. I don't mind the tires, just they way they look on the tire. Lowering springs seem to be the best idea - how much firmer will it ride, if any?
 

Gumby

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
21
0
0
Urbandale, IA.....for now!!!
Apr 7, 2004
#24
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #24
It will ride a little bit firmer, it will corner better and handle better, but not kick your ass when daily driving.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 7, 2004
#25
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #25
if you decide to lower your stang, a concern would be your front tires rubbing. im going to add 275s up front soon, and the guys at discout tire direct said it was ok as long as i didnt drop the ride height. as it is, they might have to bang out the wheel well (sp?) on my stang
 

babino

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
90
0
0
Apr 7, 2004
#26
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #26
DerekStangGT said:
if you decide to lower your stang, a concern would be your front tires rubbing. im going to add 275s up front soon, and the guys at discout tire direct said it was ok as long as i didnt drop the ride height. as it is, they might have to bang out the wheel well (sp?) on my stang
Click to expand...

It would be great to get confirmation that the 275/35's wouldn't rub up front. The C springs profess a 1.2" drop up front and a 1" drop in the rear. I read some posts where GT owners confirmed that they had 275's and were lowered without rubbing problems. Of course I can't find those posts now...
 

Slider

Founding Member
May 19, 2000
729
1
18
Gainesville, FL
Apr 7, 2004
#27
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #27
Don't seat it. You bought the right tires. You just need to lower it. The lower profile tires compaired with the large wheel gaps are what makes it look "bad." It is basically an optical illusion. Lower it about an inch or so and it will look like a new car, and you will be very happy.

C springs are fine. The only problem is that they really need to be cut in the rear. The usually need about 1 coil off to make the car sit even. If not it will have the raked look, which is really not that bid of a deal and I kind of like it. Get them from GEF.
 

babino

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
90
0
0
Apr 7, 2004
#28
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #28
Final call... for now.

I made a decision and went with the Ford Performance B springs. I wanted to keep a more 'stock' feel since it is a daily driver and not a drag racer.. unless I'm tempted of course ...or is it the other way around

That should lower it 1.25" front and 1" rear and I can cut them if needed. I don't mind a .25" rake effect, since the tires are nearly identical in height.

I'll post some pics tonight when I get a chance... thanks for all the help! Stangnet rocks!

(Pics delayed until tomorrow - hopefully will have Magnaflow X and Catback installed mid-afternoon... sweet!)
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers
  • hassler
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
428
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
KRUISR
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
114
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
743
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
465
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?