• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Aspect Ratio for Front

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeventyMach1
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2006

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jan 3, 2006
#1
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #1
I'll be bumping up to a 265 for the front, as I have a little rim showing. It makes me nervous. Let's just say if I curbed it, I would be pissed.


I run a 315/35/17 out back. What aspect ratio for a 265 tire would have the equivalent sidewall to a 315 tire? Would 265/40/17 match up perfect? 265/45/17? Or what?

Sidewall is nice ..... because of the comfort of the ride. But I'm tired of the look. The one's I've got have WAY too much sidewall. Plus, when I lower the car, it might not even clear good. So I want to widen the tire, but lower the aspect ratio. Any advice?
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Jan 3, 2006
#2
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #2
i would think that the sidewall hight you would want would be the same number as the rear, i mean with shouldent affect sidewall height. I am running 295/35/18s rear and 265/35/18s front, and the sidewalls are exactly the same height
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Jan 3, 2006
#3
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #3
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

This should help you. A 265/40/17 would have a 4.2in sidewall
A 265/45/17 would have a 4.7in sidewall
A 275/40/17 would have a 4.3in sidewall

315/35/17 has a 4.3in sidewall too.






After looking at this, I should have ordered 255/40s not 255/45s. I guess I will go up to the 275/40 next time
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 3, 2006
#4
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #4
GreenMustangGt said:
i would think that the sidewall hight you would want would be the same number as the rear, i mean with shouldent affect sidewall height. I am running 295/35/18s rear and 265/35/18s front, and the sidewalls are exactly the same height
Click to expand...
the aspect ratio is the percentage of the width of the tire. So with 295/35's, the height is 35% of the width (0.35*295mm). And the fronts are 265mm * .35.

But the numbers can be off since dimensions from one tire manufacturer to another vary. And mounted heights can vary as well (wheel width etc as a factor).

I have found that crunching the numbers gets you close but you almost have to mount/mock up the tires on the rims to make sure it will have the right height and look.

Good luck.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jan 3, 2006
#5
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #5
Yeah, I knew that the aspect ratio was a percentage .... that's why I asked the question. Otherwise I would have just got the same. Maybe you lucked up Kyle ..... do you run the same brand tires front & back? Thanks guys.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jan 3, 2006
#6
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #6
Thanks for that link Mustangless. What do you run out back? I'm thinking I'll need the 265/40's up front, at 0.1" smaller than the rears. Or maybe the 265/45's at 0.4" taller than the rears. But I'm leaning with the 40's.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 3, 2006
#7
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #7
SeventyMach1 said:
Yeah, I knew that the aspect ratio was a percentage .... that's why I asked the question. Otherwise I would have just got the same. Maybe you lucked up Kyle ..... do you run the same brand tires front & back? Thanks guys.
Click to expand...
From the choices you listed in the opening post, I knew you knew that Justin.

I was just trying to clarify and explain how Kyle might have ended up with the same absolute heights on his tires. Then again, it seems to me the difference in his sidewall heights is only around 10 mm, which aint much to the bare eye.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Jan 3, 2006
#8
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #8
Looking back ay my post, I guess I did sound kind of rude. Sorry about that. Nah, I wasn't shooting that post at you JT. (or anyone really).
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 3, 2006
#9
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #9
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Jan 3, 2006
#10
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #10
yeah good point, im sure there is a diffrence, i just dont notice it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
18” vs. 17” wheels on fox
  • dz01
  • Nov 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2024
2000xp8
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Wheel backspacing
  • Brad Hanks
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
422
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 25, 2025
Brad Hanks
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
401
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?