been thinking on the procharger and kenne bell. on average from the sheets that have been posted the kenne bell makes more power out of the box. its boost comes on in the low rpm band and stays there, great torque curve. but its strength is also a weakness, i mean for a street car. as the boost is aalways on, the engine is consuming huge amounts of fuel? the centrifugal type makes boost as rpm's go up, so for a daily driven car if one were to drive normally, then the car wouldnt see boost all the time, therefore burning less fuel correct? i am curious because i have a 97 cougar, and would like to go with forced induction. but i drive 90 miles a day on the interstate. as it is now my car rolls at 1900rpm at 65mph. Woudl you recomend a KB or ATI unit for such an application? 
. anyhow even at highway speeds the blower won't make that much boost, if any since your driving normally. i'm sure there are others on here that can explain it better than me.
. I see the flame war starting. The best advise I can give you is to do the research, read tech articles. KB has an AWESOME tech section on its website. Not to diss anyone here, there is alot of good advise given out, but at the same time for some reason these blower threads always get flooded with biased opinions. I AM NOT trying to put anyone down, so please don't take it that way. Do the reseach and take what you hear from this post how you want, just remember that whatever you settle with should fit your needs and no one elses.
