• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

AWD EcoBoost Mustang in 2012???

  • Thread starter Thread starter cougar_68
  • Start date Start date Sep 11, 2009

How do you feel about Ford making an AWD, twin turbo V6 EcoBoost, Mustang?

  • I don't care if they make it or don't make.

    Votes: 5 16.1%
  • It's a cool idea, but I wouldn't buy one.

    Votes: 12 38.7%
  • I'm down right against the whole idea.

    Votes: 5 16.1%
  • I would definately consider buying one.

    Votes: 9 29.0%

  • Total voters
    31
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 13, 2009
#21
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #21
plotzie73 said:
Having an AWD vehicle with over 300 hp is awesome. 2000 volvo v70r. For people in harsh winters CANADA, having to put away a GT for 5-6 months of the year sucks. I'd bet Ford has looked into this somewhere and you gotta think some engineer has plans for it and just needs to convince the right executives to make it happen. oh yeah the look on people's face when you pull away from a muscle car at the lights in a volvo station wagon is just plain awesome!
Click to expand...

Can you imagine pulling away from an AWD SUV/Truck on a snowy day in a Mustang?! Now that would also be cool. Can't do it in a GT though.
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Sep 13, 2009
#22
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #22
cougar_68 said:
I agree, that AWD Mustang probably won't happen, just dreaming. I do think ford needs something to compete with the STI's and EVO's out there though. An EcoBoost AWD Fusion would be pretty sweet, still not a Mustang, but pretty sweet. Only if they price it right though.

The V6 sport fusion they have now seems pretty cool, but I don’t feel like 265hp is really enough to compete. That and it’s probably heavier than the smaller turbo 4’s.

If they brought back the Cougar with AWD I would be in heaven. Although I think they should base the Cougar off the Mustang platform as it was in the 60’s. Therefore, if you can make an AWD Cougar you can make an AWD Mustang.
Click to expand...

Ford could very well compete with STIs and Evos for what I think would be fairly cost-effective for them. The AWD Fusion would make for an excellent platform with the Focus RS's engine from overseas. It would also do well to drop in the rumored 315 hp V6 that is supposedly slated for the next V6 Mustang.
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 13, 2009
#23
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #23
Top Speed said:
Ford could very well compete with STIs and Evos for what I think would be fairly cost-effective for them. The AWD Fusion would make for an excellent platform with the Focus RS's engine from overseas. It would also do well to drop in the rumored 315 hp V6 that is supposedly slated for the next V6 Mustang.
Click to expand...
I think to compete the Fusion would have to be 4 cyl Turbo. The current V6 model is already 500 lbs *corection 408 lbs, not 500* heavier than the STI and has 40 less hp and torque.

The 4 cyl Fusion is only 50 lbs lighter than the STI. It will probably gain some weight going Turbo and suspension/brake upgrades. A regular Impreza is 320 lbs lighter than the STI.

I just noticed they now offer four different stages for the Impreza:

2.5i = 170hp
2.5GT = 224hp
WRX = 265 hp
WRX STI = 305 hp

The Fusion “somewhat” has the first three covered. lol
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Sep 13, 2009
#24
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #24
cougar_68 said:
I think to compete the Fusion would have to be 4 cyl Turbo. The current V6 model is already 500 lbs heavier than the STI and has 40 less hp and torque.

The 4 cyl Fusion is only 50 lbs lighter than the STI. It will probably gain some weight going Turbo and suspension/brake upgrades. A regular Impreza is 320 lbs lighter than the STI.

I just noticed they now offer four different stages for the Impreza:

2.5i = 170hp
2.5GT = 224hp
WRX = 265 hp
WRX STI = 305 hp

The Fusion “somewhat” has the first three covered. lol
Click to expand...

The 2.5GT is last year's WRX. People were upset with the ugliness and plainness of the WRX so Subaru granted their wishes by giving it a more aggressive look and more power. It's ironic that I think the WRX looks better than the STI, and what's even more ironic is that the WRX is faster from 0-60 than the STI, undoubtedly due to longer gears from the 5spd vs. the STI's 6spd.

As for the weight, are you trying to tell me the Fusion AWD V6 weighs 3900 lbs? The STI tips the scales at around 3400 lbs now.
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 13, 2009
#25
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #25
Top Speed said:
The 2.5GT is last year's WRX. People were upset with the ugliness and plainness of the WRX so Subaru granted their wishes by giving it a more aggressive look and more power. It's ironic that I think the WRX looks better than the STI, and what's even more ironic is that the WRX is faster from 0-60 than the STI, undoubtedly due to longer gears from the 5spd vs. the STI's 6spd.

As for the weight, are you trying to tell me the Fusion AWD V6 weighs 3900 lbs? The STI tips the scales at around 3400 lbs now.
Click to expand...

Per MSN Autos:

Fusion Sport V6 Weighs 3803 lbs
WRX STI weighs 3395 lbs

I guess I can't "add good" today, the Fusion is only 408 lbs heavier...
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Sep 13, 2009
#26
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #26
cougar_68 said:
Per MSN Autos:

Fusion Sport V6 Weighs 3803 lbs
WRX STI weighs 3395 lbs

I guess I can't "add good" today, the Fusion is only 408 lbs heavier...
Click to expand...

That's just ridiculous that the Fusion weighs that much. Bigger Japanese cars don't even weight that much!
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Sep 13, 2009
#27
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #27
Everyones getting FAT..... 3800lb fusion, 4300lb Taurus Sho, 4200lb buick lacrosse...... Seems thats whats in lol.... its sad that just less than a decade ago I remember 3400lbs was fat. Anyway, looks like its the way of automobiles these days.
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 13, 2009
#28
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #28
Yeah, I know right. The 4 cyl manual is only 3285 lbs though. Add ~300 lbs to that for turbo and other goodies and you are up to ~3600 lbs (about 200 lbs heavier than STI). Not terrible if they can make it about 325hp.
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Sep 13, 2009
#29
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #29
Well, you got some ppl who think that a wieght gain is horrible, as long as its engineered right , I dont see a problem. I mean are ppl trying to say that an AMG mercedes is a piece of junk because it tips near 4000lbs.....please lol. Line up to a good ole AMG and think that just because its heavy your going to pull it.

Safty is the top priority now adays, theres alot they have to meet..... Lighter would be great...but its not goint to happen in todays times....I guess we have to deal with it, but I dont think we'll be disapointed.
Bye Bye AMG
 

plotzie73

New Member
Sep 5, 2009
10
0
0
Sep 14, 2009
#30
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #30
cougar_68 said:
Can you imagine pulling away from an AWD SUV/Truck on a snowy day in a Mustang?! Now that would also be cool. Can't do it in a GT though.
Click to expand...

You'd be Grinning ear to ear lol! it would be a great feeling!
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Sep 14, 2009
#31
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #31
SS02 said:
Everyones getting FAT..... 3800lb fusion, 4300lb Taurus Sho, 4200lb buick lacrosse...... Seems thats whats in lol.... its sad that just less than a decade ago I remember 3400lbs was fat. Anyway, looks like its the way of automobiles these days.
Click to expand...

No, it's only "in" for the domestics. Everyone talks about how these cars need to hit safety regulations for 2012, and that obviously also includes the imports. It seems that Nissan managed to keep costs at nearly the same level as the 350Z with the 370Z, yet found a way to not only meet new safety standards, but lose over 200 lbs in the process.

Don't tell me it can't be done without significantly raising prices, and don't tell me, "Look how small the 370Z is." Being that the 370Z is smaller than cars like the Mustang and Camaro, I'd have reason to believe that it would be easier to trim 200 lbs from a larger vehicle than a small one.
 
B

boston2k4

New Member
Jun 11, 2009
107
0
0
Sep 14, 2009
#32
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #32
Well I'd hate to see it bit someday it will happen.. Hopefully when I'm old or dead because they slowly kill off our muscle cars look at the following today the poor impala Malibu ... Charger ... Ford hasn't done us wrong lately (excluding the mustang II) so they are due to acre us over real good
 
B

boston2k4

New Member
Jun 11, 2009
107
0
0
Sep 14, 2009
#33
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #33
And I'm sorry for the spelling my fingers are fat and the iPod is small
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 14, 2009
#34
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #34
plotzie73 said:
You'd be Grinning ear to ear lol! it would be a great feeling!
Click to expand...


I know right!!!
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 14, 2009
#35
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #35
Top Speed said:
No, it's only "in" for the domestics. Everyone talks about how these cars need to hit safety regulations for 2012, and that obviously also includes the imports. It seems that Nissan managed to keep costs at nearly the same level as the 350Z with the 370Z, yet found a way to not only meet new safety standards, but lose over 200 lbs in the process.

Don't tell me it can't be done without significantly raising prices, and don't tell me, "Look how small the 370Z is." Being that the 370Z is smaller than cars like the Mustang and Camaro, I'd have reason to believe that it would be easier to trim 200 lbs from a larger vehicle than a small one.
Click to expand...


All these cars are 2.4/5L 4 Cyl with Manual. The Fusion is right there in the middle and the Acura TSX is a real fat a**!!

2010 Fusion = 3285
2010 Camry = 3263
2010 Accord = 3230
2010 TSX = 3400
2010 Sonata = 3327

All these cars are 2.4/5L 4 Cyl with Auto. The Ford is not the heaviest and Nissan must have exceptionally light vehicles.

2010 Fusion = 3342
2009 Altima = 3112
2009 Glalant = 3395

All together I don't think the Fusion is that much heavier like you say it is.
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 14, 2009
#36
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #36
boston2k4 said:
Well I'd hate to see it bit someday it will happen.. Hopefully when I'm old or dead because they slowly kill off our muscle cars look at the following today the poor impala Malibu ... Charger ... Ford hasn't done us wrong lately (excluding the mustang II) so they are due to acre us over real good
Click to expand...


What are you refering to?
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 14, 2009
#37
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #37
Some food for thought:

1994 Dodge stealth, 2 door, 3.0L V6, twin turbo, 320HP, AWD, 3792 lbs.

2012 Ford Mustang, 2 door, 3.5L V6, twin turbo, 365HP (minimum), AWD, 3800 lbs (maximum, hopefully)
 
S

SS02

New Member
May 30, 2009
427
0
0
Fort Worth, Texas
Sep 14, 2009
#38
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #38
Its platform I dont believe would be AWD compatable.... Nice thinking bud, lol but Ford isnt going to do it. Your stuck with the Taurus
 

cougar_68

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2001
849
0
0
Garrett, IN
Sep 14, 2009
#39
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #39
SS02 said:
Its platform I dont believe would be AWD compatable.... Nice thinking bud, lol but Ford isnt going to do it. Your stuck with the Taurus
Click to expand...

Like I said, when I win the lottery...lol.

I wonder if I could get a government grant to build an AWD Mustang and present it to Ford. That could be my "job". Then when I'm done the Mustang could be my "company car".
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Sep 14, 2009
#40
  • Sep 14, 2009
  • #40
the chassis wont support AWD. Just no way to run the front drivetrain components. Would i buy am AWD Stang? hell yes. i had to sell my 03 gt because i needed AWD. The infiniti AWD system is a blast. its RWD Most of the time so its fun to drive
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
S
Interior and Upholstery Drivers seat problems
  • StageMage
  • Aug 5, 2021
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
968
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Aug 6, 2021
David Young
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
R
POWER WINDOW/ AUTO-DROP ISSUE - SOS
  • Rockefeller
  • Aug 28, 2020
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
13
Views
9K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Jun 21, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?