• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

B-cam with Twisted Wedge & 1.7s...good choice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BaddNotch
  • Start date Start date Apr 27, 2005

BaddNotch

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
71
0
0
GreatWhiteNorth,USA
Apr 27, 2005
#1
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #1
I'm running the original cam right now, but want the lope and to squeeze out some more power. I was planning the TFS Stage 1 cam, but I don't really want to go to 1.6 rockers. I already have FMS 1.7 rockers and can't justify the move financially. Not sure what other cam would work.

Please, recommend away.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Apr 27, 2005
#2
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #2
If your gonna be using 1.7 rockers and want a decent shelf cam, use a comp XE270 cam. You will need to upgrade your valve springs.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Apr 27, 2005
#3
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #3
The B cam is way, way outdated, the TW cam is way better, but like Grn92LX said you need a 1.7 ratio specific cam for best results and new valve springs are a no-brainer. Also, what heads, intake, headers are on your car? Putting a bigger cam in aint gonna do much if any of the above are lacking.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Apr 27, 2005
#4
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #4
That XE270HR has a powerband of 1800-5800 rpm....pretty much perfect for those TW heads. I forsee that cam becoming very popular in the 5.0 world within the next few years.

I also picked that cam for my Edelbrock RPM intake/heads combo
 

88GT17MA

Member
Nov 1, 2004
289
0
16
Apr 27, 2005
#5
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #5
BaddNotch said:
I was planning the TFS Stage 1 cam, but I don't really want to go to 1.6 rockers. I already have FMS 1.7 rockers and can't justify the move financially.
Click to expand...

Ive got tw heads, 1.7 rockers, and pushrods to run the stage one cam. Its the tfs cam that ends in 0000's I think.......thats the cam I was going to run with my tw heads and 1.7's but now im going for a custom grind.
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Apr 28, 2005
#6
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #6
vikingpower said:
The B cam is way, way outdated, the TW cam is way better, but like Grn92LX said you need a 1.7 ratio specific cam for best results and new valve springs are a no-brainer. Also, what heads, intake, headers are on your car? Putting a bigger cam in aint gonna do much if any of the above are lacking.
Click to expand...

I agree, i have the B cam, its great but a split duration cam like the TFS stage 1 cam is a much better choice, plus it has more lift, and more lift = more torque without changing the powerband.......
 

BaddNotch

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
71
0
0
GreatWhiteNorth,USA
Apr 28, 2005
#7
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #7
Thanks guys! I've been in this game long enough to know all my options at one time and now I'm out of the loop, though I still bleed Ford blue. I started losing interest 4 years ago, but I can't bring myself to sell 'er. (second mustang, bought this one in '96)


Anyways, I almost think they are 1.72 rockers? They are blue FMS, and were expensive. I also have GT40 intake with a ported lower...and the heads were lightly ported. There's about 35K on the heads. The springs are original with 40K on them. Refresh my memory: they fatigue much quicker with that much lift and/or they should have been changed to a stiffer spring??

I remember calling Trick Flow and they said I would have to change to 1.6 rr's. If I could use my 1.7(2?) rockers, the stage 1 would be my 1st choice.

 

88GT17MA

Member
Nov 1, 2004
289
0
16
Apr 28, 2005
#8
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #8
BaddNotch said:
Thanks guys! I've been in this game long enough to know all my options at one time and now I'm out of the loop, though I still bleed Ford blue. I started losing interest 4 years ago, but I can't bring myself to sell 'er. (second mustang, bought this one in '96)


Anyways, I almost think they are 1.72 rockers? They are blue FMS, and were expensive. I also have GT40 intake with a ported lower...and the heads were lightly ported. There's about 35K on the heads. The springs are original with 40K on them. Refresh my memory: they fatigue much quicker with that much lift and/or they should have been changed to a stiffer spring??

I remember calling Trick Flow and they said I would have to change to 1.6 rr's. If I could use my 1.7(2?) rockers, the stage 1 would be my 1st choice.

Click to expand...



Im sure trickflow probably has a better understanding than me. I havent run this setup but bought the heads from a guy who was. i was worried about pvc and he said he had NO problems what so ever. he said he called tfs to see about running the tfs stage 2 or 3 with the 1.7 and they said that with 1.7's he would have to stick to the stage 1. These are also tfs 1.7 rockers, not ford.........there are equations to figure out your lift, etc, to get a more accurate guess. Good luck
 

goesquik

New Member
Mar 17, 2003
33
0
0
motor city
Apr 28, 2005
#9
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #9
I currently have a 306 w/tfs heads 1.7 rockers and a trickflow stage 1 cam. I used to have the B-cam and it was better mid to top end than the tfs. The tfs kinda sucks I would not reccomend stage 1, go with an anderson fms cam, thats what i am looking at next.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Apr 28, 2005
#10
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #10
LOVE my xe270hr-12 comp cam...idles better than any Alphabet cam in terms of sound, the computer seems to like it too as I have had no surge stall issues, and the power band is STRONG from just over 2000-6000clean.
 

BaddNotch

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
71
0
0
GreatWhiteNorth,USA
Apr 28, 2005
#11
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #11
BaddNotch said:
There's about 35K on the heads. The springs are original with 40K on them.
Click to expand...
woops, make that 40K on both.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Apr 28, 2005
#12
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #12
88GT17MA said:
...... now im going for a custom grind.
Click to expand...

That's the best thing to do.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Apr 28, 2005
#13
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #13
I've seen people run the TFS stageOne cam with 1.7 RRs. Call trickflow though to get the events straight.
 
S

Speeds8erM-1

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2000
1,240
0
36
Pensacola Florida
Apr 29, 2005
#14
  • Apr 29, 2005
  • #14
Whatever you do, find something besides the B Cam. Lotta hacking but no chips flying!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
437
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Resolved Noisy Valvetrain
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2024
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?