• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Benefits of High compression

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bad92GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 6, 2007

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Jan 6, 2007
#1
  • Jan 6, 2007
  • #1
I understand the whole theory, design, and way it works, So thats all just fine and what not. What i'd like to figure out is how much of a gain can you see from this.. lets say you bumped a standard stroke, standard bore 302 to 10.5:1.. pump gas.. (premium 92).. will the differences actually show up on your dyno chart? A couple cars dyno sheets were high compression and there numbers didn't impress me, basically because your giving up your ability to run boost for it, yet you get minimal gains (so i've seen). I'd like to just figure out if it is in fact worth the money/time to go high compression? Can someone explain this to me.. thanks folks
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jan 6, 2007
#2
  • Jan 6, 2007
  • #2
Boost is *somewhat* another way to raise the peak compression of an engine. Generally, you can create a higher maintainable compression rating with boost than you can in high compression N/A form... which is why boosted cars USUALLY put down higher numbers than high compression cars...

Compression WILL raise HP numbers... but you gotta incorperate the flow too. I'm not sure what examples you are talking about that didn't impress you. Im sure I could find 15 good examples of what compression can do.

To name one.

Me and my bro built a mild 302 from an 86 block.

- Stock e-7 heads (from a truck) with exhaust bump ground out
- 289 high dome high compression pistons
- e-303 cam
- edelbrock intake and street avengar carb

every else... STOCK

We estimated the compression to be somewhere around 12:1

It laid down 317 HP at our dyno in Bloomington.

What was so special about this combo? Nothing really. The only real different between this combo and a stocker would be the compression rating. Hell, you hardly see 302's with the trickflow topend kit pushing these numbers..

In my neck of the woods... compression is known as the poor mans racing trick. It doesn't really cost anything and its effective.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Jan 6, 2007
#3
  • Jan 6, 2007
  • #3
poneypower89 said:
In my neck of the woods... compression is known as the poor mans racing trick. It doesn't really cost anything and its effective.
Click to expand...

True. I went with the high compression because I wanted all I could get out of said money. It cost the same, basically, to do "combo A" low compression or high compression. My plant was closing so money was tight. I knew a charger was out of the question however spray was not. So I end up with 11:1 347 with spray.


Maybe someone like Rick will chime in with some hard data for you.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Jan 6, 2007
#4
  • Jan 6, 2007
  • #4
poneypower89 said:
It laid down 317 HP at our dyno in Bloomington.
Click to expand...

just wondering, is that at the wheels? did it have a/c and power steering?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
New to me Fox body. Looking for Rough HP and compression ratio
  • Halford4491
  • Oct 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2021
General karthief
Need suspension help? Check out OpenTracker
  • Husky44
  • Sep 9, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2021
Husky44
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?