• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Best HCI combo NA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93STVCobra
  • Start date Start date May 9, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,089
2,695
224
Vass, NC
May 13, 2011
#41
  • May 13, 2011
  • #41
Wow, Rick! I haven't seen such a passionate post in a while
 
B

bgoins

Member
Feb 23, 2009
130
0
16
hampton roads, virginia
May 13, 2011
#42
  • May 13, 2011
  • #42
I'm not sure why u guys aren't talking about TW 185 heads. Can't u put them in a stock shortblock without notching the pistons?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 13, 2011
#43
  • May 13, 2011
  • #43
bgoins said:
I'm not sure why u guys aren't talking about TW 185 heads. Can't u put them in a stock shortblock without notching the pistons?
Click to expand...

They are a great head, but are about $400 more then a AFR185... They will fit on a stock piston with a max of around .550" lift.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 13, 2011
#44
  • May 13, 2011
  • #44
Rick 91GT said:
There is some good info and discussions in this thread and some bad...
Click to expand...

Good post, Rick! Question for ya: Do you go through Comp to get your custom cams, and do you use their lobe catalog? Also, is John's cam billet or SADI core?

FastDriver said:
Nik,

I think he's referring to his experience with PTV contact on 185s...

Easy there, stud.

Chris
Click to expand...

I apologize, I couldn't think of a less abrasive way to word it. That, and I had just worked a 12 hour day and was a little irritable, haha. You know me, I try my best to keep conversation civil.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 13, 2011
#45
  • May 13, 2011
  • #45
I use COMP and their Master Lobe Catalog, his was a SADI core...no need for billet on that one.

Here's a pic of John's beast, pretty ain't it
 

Attachments

  • 333 beast.webp
    144 KB · Views: 194

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 13, 2011
#46
  • May 13, 2011
  • #46
Rick 91GT said:
They are a great head, but are about $400 more then a AFR185... They will fit on a stock piston with a max of around .550" lift.
Click to expand...

My TW 205s (which have the same valves and locations as the 185s) had ~.115" PtV clearance on the intake and ~.185" PtV clearance on the exhaust on my stock '86 short block, which of course has true flat top pistons with no valve reliefs. My cam with 1.6 rockers is ~.570" lift intake and exhaust, BUT I have very mild intake and exhaust duration, very little overlap, which is the saving grace there. (My junk is actually set up for a 1.7 rocker, which would have lift in the .600" range, but we went with 1.6 to save spring life a little.) My heads were also milled for a little compression, and my pistons were all between .005"-.010" above deck, BTW.

In other words, the repositioning of the valves on a TW head allow for some pretty awesome PtV clearance.

Also, FWIW, it should probably be mentioned for anyone reading this that the TW 185 is actually a lot larger head than the AFR 185. The port volume is misleading, because the TW has a shorter port with a bigger cross section. The TW 185 flows roughly 25 more CFM on the flow bench, from what I remember.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 13, 2011
#47
  • May 13, 2011
  • #47
Rick 91GT said:
I use COMP and their Master Lobe Catalog, his was a SADI core...no need for billet on that one.

Here's a pic of John's beast, pretty ain't it
Click to expand...

That is a sexy engine, haha. One of the best powder coating jobs I've ever seen.

Rick, out of curiosity, in your opinion when is a billet cam necessary? My cam is a SADI, and also is a custom pulling lobes from the Comp catalog. I originally was leaning toward billet, but Mike over at TEA seemed to think it wasn't worth it.
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
May 13, 2011
#48
  • May 13, 2011
  • #48
Rick 91GT said:
I use COMP and their Master Lobe Catalog, his was a SADI core...no need for billet on that one.

Here's a pic of John's beast, pretty ain't it
Click to expand...


heres to date pics









 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 13, 2011
#49
  • May 13, 2011
  • #49
NikwoaC said:
Also, FWIW, it should probably be mentioned for anyone reading this that the TW 185 is actually a lot larger head than the AFR 185. The port volume is misleading, because the TW has a shorter port with a bigger cross section. The TW 185 flows roughly 25 more CFM on the flow bench, from what I remember.
Click to expand...

I havent had the pleasure of flowing a set yet, but your right about the cross section, can't just look at the number. I put a set on a 347 but never got it on the dyno, the heads looked great and come with decent valvetrain and seals.

I look at spring pressure amongnst other things when you get into a billet core, the profile matters as well. Almost all my soild roller stuff ends up being Billet.
 
B

bgoins

Member
Feb 23, 2009
130
0
16
hampton roads, virginia
May 13, 2011
#50
  • May 13, 2011
  • #50
The extra money spent on the TW 185 heads might be worth it to not have to worry about cutting those pistons. Another option are the Fast as Cast 190 heads. I think they run about $1500
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,089
2,695
224
Vass, NC
May 13, 2011
#51
  • May 13, 2011
  • #51
89stang1 said:
heres to date pics
Click to expand...

You just keep in mind who's got first dibs...
 
L

laford1986

New Member
Feb 8, 2006
20
0
0
May 14, 2011
#52
  • May 14, 2011
  • #52
NikwoaC said:
I wouldn't say it's "not worth it". IMHO, buying an AFR 165 in this day and age is more "not worth it".

I guess I'm more of the mindset of doing it right, even if it takes more effort and more time. Limiting the direction of your engine build because of speed bumps such as valve notch size is a cop out.



An AFR 185 is not necessarily "too small" for a 331/347, but bear in mind there are probably better choices out there, and those better choices probably include larger heads.
Click to expand...

Dude, the AFR 185 heads are PERFECT for a 331-347. You need to understand how these heads are designed. Very state of the art. By the way I have a 347 and the 185's. AWESOME
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Dirty Water Racing 89 Notch Project
  • ShedBuiltMS
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2021
Flyboy60
F
Trying To Match The Hci-plus-vortech Build Described In This Article As Close As Possible
  • revcor
  • Jan 3, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 20, 2018
Reddevil91
Progress Thread Calypso Cash Pit
  • JKWilson61
  • Jun 7, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 13, 2019
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?