• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Best intake manifold for a stockish engine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dz187
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2009

dz187

Member
Sep 22, 2005
65
0
6
Arizona
Jan 22, 2009
#1
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #1
It started with buying valve covers, because the paint is peeling off my stockers and the gaskets are a little leaky. Since then I've decided to get some 1.7RRs along with new pushrods and lifters to freshen up the top end. I figure since I will have the intake off I might as well replace that as well. I plan on doing some sort of power adder in the future, but that is a long while off because I will need to rebuild my 160k mile engine. However, it runs great, gets 18+mpg city and doesn't burn a bit of oil so I plan on doing supporting mods and suspension for now.

I tried doing a search, and I found all sorts of manifold information, just not what I need to know. Mods are in sig.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Jan 22, 2009
#2
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #2
Personally, I think that lifters and pushrods are a waste of money at this point. I'd put that money towards something that will actually improve your performance.

As far as a manifold goes, I'd recommend a Cobra or GT40. On my friends otherwise bone stock 88 Saleen, he picked up 23 dyno-proven horsepower with nothing except a Cobra intake swap. The Cobra, Explorer and GT40 are all essentially identical in performance.
 
B

bentley429

Banned
Nov 25, 2004
528
3
0
Connecticut
Jan 22, 2009
#3
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #3
Or a edelbrock performer. Whatever you can pick up for a reasonable price out of those options would be fine.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,687
224
Vass, NC
Jan 22, 2009
#4
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #4
I concur with all of the above, but would also add that the BBK intake is supposed to target the same rpm range that the others mentioned to, and would be a good match as well.
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Jan 24, 2009
#5
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #5
Explorer intake.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jan 24, 2009
#6
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #6
95-97 Ford Explorer intake manifold & throttle body $150-$300. The intake manifold flows 220 CFM +, much better than stock. Throttle body is 65 MM, bigger than the 60 MM on stock stangs. I got a 96 with EGR passages that match the stock setup, so my smog gear works just like factory. You’ll need a 65 MM EGR spacer & new gaskets for $65-$90 so you have a place to mount the EGR & throttle linkage.

94-95 Mustang GT MAF - $40-$100. It is 70 MM instead of the stock 55 MM on regular stangs built prior to 94. It uses a slip on duct on the side that goes to the throttle body and a 4 bolt flange on the other. You need a flange adapter to fit the stock slip on air ducting that goes to the air box. Wiring plugs right in with no changes. *1 *2

*1.) Metal flange adapter Kurtz Kustomz Motorsports, Inc. KKM Buy the TR70 for $44.95. Or spend some time on eBay looking for one that may fit.
Try AutoZone and ask for 81413 - Spectre / 3 in. Aluminum Intake Mass Air Flow Sensor Adapter at $12.00. You may have to order it online.

*2.) MAF & sensor interchange
The 94-95 Mustang 5.0 MAF & sensor is also found on:
1995-94 Mustang 3.8L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Crown Victoria 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1995-94 Mustang, Mustang Cobra 5.0L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Town Car 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Grand Marquis 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
Evidently the –A1A, -A2A, AA, etc. on the end of the part number is a minor variant that did not change the operating specs. You should be able to ignore it and have everything work good.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Jan 24, 2009
#7
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #7
I put a Cobra intake (US-made version) on my then-stock '88 and felt a huge difference over 2500RPM. Really pulled harder.
 

bryce93lx

Member
Jan 20, 2006
88
1
19
Luke AFB AZ
Jan 24, 2009
#8
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #8
the new cobra intakes are junk go with trick flow or edelbrock, or a older "real" cobra intake (I.e the us made ones)
 

gwiedner

New Member
Nov 8, 2008
34
0
0
San Diego, CA
Jan 24, 2009
#9
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #9
I have a trick flow and felt a big difference
 

Vinnietbird

Member
Jun 2, 2005
584
3
19
Jan 24, 2009
#10
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #10
50specialist said:
Explorer intake.
Click to expand...

I agree.I got mine a couple of years ago ,and after the install,there was an actual difference you could feel.I converted the Explorer 65mm t-body for the Fox body setup.

 

Attachments

  • 000_0509.webp
    63.5 KB · Views: 140
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Jan 24, 2009
#11
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #11
Nice! I installed one also with Explorer 65mm TB and 65mm EGR spacer from Professional Products. Woke up my stang. I also installed the Explorer injectors, since the ones that came with the intake were also 19 pounds.





 

Vinnietbird

Member
Jun 2, 2005
584
3
19
Jan 24, 2009
#12
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #12
I used the skinny Explorer injectors as well.It was a great upgrade for cheap that actually made a difference.
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Jan 24, 2009
#13
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #13
Yup. They atomize the fuel a lot better. In fact, after completing the swap, my exhaust fumes are not even half has potent as they used to be with the stock intake and fuel injectors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
848
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
778
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
283
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
For Sale Hogans Racing Intake manifold for SBF
  • Bullitt347
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
488
Engine and Power Adder Jun 7, 2025
Bullitt347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?