• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Best Rear Suspension

  • Thread starter Thread starter DRock9
  • Start date Start date Jan 1, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jan 1, 2007
#1
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #1
I read an article on fordmuscle where they put upper/lower rear control arms and said it drastically improved their 60' times and it was much harder for them to break loose their tires but the price for what they did was like $600. I went to 50resto and MM has a "Rear Grip Kit" for $560 and it has more than the other kit minus the upper control arms, and I am figuring that since MM is the best company that this kit must be the one that will give me the best performance. What I am wondering is if this is true, and if so why don't they include the upper control arms in their package? Not neccessary? This is the kit I am talking about:

http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/iwwida.pvx?;item?item_no=MM-MMRG1 1&comp=LRS

In the picture, the long black "Torque Arm?" doesn't come with it right?

Also, I figure while I am making this, will I notice a dramatic improvement with handling if I install a strut tower brace and k-member brace from MM aswell? I read that they are pretty much neccessary for Verts but nothing about Hatch's. I am spraying this with a 150shot soon and I just want to be able to fully utilize the power I am going to be putting down.

Thanks for your help!
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jan 1, 2007
#2
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #2
*checking sig just updated it*
 

smokin joe

Founding Member
Sep 30, 2000
746
45
49
Dallas,TX
Jan 1, 2007
#3
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #3
You are correct, the kit you show eliminates the upper control arms. The panhard bar takes over the control of the side to side movement. The only way to really tell what comes with it is to contact them.I personally would buy all my suspension from manufacurer. The suspension you choose has mostly to do with what you plan on doing with the car.
 
F

FullAuto

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
157
0
16
Midwest City, Ok
Jan 1, 2007
#4
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #4
IMO, Team Z or Wolfe makes the best rear suspension.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jan 1, 2007
#5
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #5
That's the wrong picture on the 50resto page. That picture is of the Torque Arm Package, Standard Duty $1112.54 plus shipping.

The rear grip kit is described correctly as having LCAs and a panhard bar. The panhard bar is more for corner carvers.

If you'e only interested in straight line performance on a budget then lowers and adjustable uppers are required. You'll also need a good set of shocks like CE's adjustables and perhaps a anti-roll bar. Of course sub frame connectors are required no matter which route you take.

The path to low and consistant 60 foots is not cheap.
 

tording

Founding Member
Nov 11, 2000
164
0
0
Hampton, VA
Jan 1, 2007
#6
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #6
In my experience just put on a set of ET streets and call it a day. I had a twin turbo mustang for a while that made 600 RWHP and I was cutting 1.60 60' times coming out on like 1 psi of boost. I could have come out harder and cut 1.5's I know but I was afraid of breaking something else. I had all stock suspension besides some Eibach drag launch springs and the car hooked and went on ET streets. They didnt hook quite as well on the street but not bad at all.
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jan 1, 2007
#7
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #7
Maryland Stang said:
That's the wrong picture on the 50resto page. That picture is of the Torque Arm Package, Standard Duty $1112.54 plus shipping.

The rear grip kit is described correctly as having LCAs and a panhard bar. The panhard bar is more for corner carvers.

If you'e only interested in straight line performance on a budget then lowers and adjustable uppers are required. You'll also need a good set of shocks like CE's adjustables and perhaps a anti-roll bar. Of course sub frame connectors are required no matter which route you take.

The path to low and consistant 60 foots is not cheap.
Click to expand...

I want the best of both worlds, I don't want to have amazing straight line capabilities but suck in the corners. This is 90% a street car which sees a lot of driving and I just want the tires to stick when I gun it but also push harder through corners. How much am I lookin to spend?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 1, 2007
#8
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #8
FullAuto said:
IMO, Team Z or Wolfe makes the best rear suspension.
Click to expand...

Gotta agree there if your looking for straight line performance, I use and support Dave @ Team Z his components are top notch and he can help you set it up properly after the sale.
 
3

347blown

New Member
Dec 29, 2006
7
0
0
NJ
Jan 1, 2007
#9
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #9
HEY GUY ; i am stuck in the same position as u, for the track get ET street tries, i deflate then to 11 psi. Night and day difference, ( no inner tubes) .for the street i think any control arms will work, i wouldn't go with southside lowers or any that don't have any give, i think that will rip apart the body. I just threw in mega bite jr, and south side uppers, i still want more bite off the line thinking of going with shocks and springs next, maybe eibach darg springs and tokico shocks, not sure if u can use them with a convertable?
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jan 1, 2007
#10
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #10
I would get ET Street tires but I don't go to the track often at all, haven't been yet, and they would suck in New England weather so thats a no no.

Can anyone else suggest something that is the best of both worlds?
 

smokin joe

Founding Member
Sep 30, 2000
746
45
49
Dallas,TX
Jan 1, 2007
#11
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #11
For my car I would go with the MM setup, I like turning fast. They can probably set you up with something that would be the best of both worlds. You may also want to look at Griggs Racing too.
 

gaslight

Founding Member
Jul 12, 2000
3,364
16
99
Maine
Jan 1, 2007
#12
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #12
I put the MM full length subs and pan hard bar on last winter. Both are great pieces and make the car more solid. The pan hard bar will get rid of the annoying fish tail action that these foxs are know for. With those 2 things I was getting better grip with the rear suspension on my street tires at the track. I also have had the MM lower control arms for quite a while. They do make some quality stuff.
As stated earlier that torque arm is not in that kit because that would add $400 to $600 more to the price. That is my next suspension piece that I want to get.
Anything you can do to stiffen the car and make the suspension do the work and not let the unibody flex the better the car will be. The strut tower brace and K member brace will def. help you out and make the car handle like it should without interference from the unibody flexing. I have the 4 point K member brace but can't fit a strut tower brace because of my turbo .
Do you have subframes yet? If not than I would do that first and make sure they are the full length ones. I'm soooo glad I put them on my car.
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jan 1, 2007
#13
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #13
Im getting SFC's as my next mod then im doing the rear suspension. I'm just wondering, the panhard bar cant HURT my straight line traction can it?

Anyone know why the MM kit doesnt come with uppers?

Thanks!
 
B

bditty50

Member
Jun 20, 2005
170
0
16
Tampa, Florida
Jan 1, 2007
#14
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #14
Drock the MM kit doesn't come with uppers because you dont need them with a panhard setup. I have the MM panhard,torque arm, and control arms and love it. I can take turns at over a g but, you have to have the front suspension and good tires. It hooks very hard and rides incredibly. I would definitely recommend them. Their customer service is excellent.
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jan 1, 2007
#15
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #15
Thanks a lot! Ill be going with that setup, whats the torque arm do?
 

Black Sun 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 23, 2002
1,337
0
36
L.I., N.Y.
Jan 2, 2007
#16
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #16
Does the panhard bar eliminate the upper control arm, or does it just make is not necessary to upgrade? I'm curious, because I'm resto'ing a '90 that has all stock components and I want to replace all the ratty, rusted items on the car.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Jan 2, 2007
#17
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #17
Black Sun 5.0 said:
Does the panhard bar eliminate the upper control arm, or does it just make is not necessary to upgrade? I'm curious, because I'm resto'ing a '90 that has all stock components and I want to replace all the ratty, rusted items on the car.
Click to expand...

The Panhard bar locates the rear end with regard to side to side in the car and prevents it from moving from side to side unpredictably. It neither replaces the UCAs or makes it necessary to replace them. It is used much more often in road racing and roundy-round (Nascar) than drag racing.

A pandhard bar is not usually used on the street.

If you're going to go through the trouble of installing a panhad bar (welding is often required) it is advisable to replace the UCAs and LCAs.

For the street I would just do the arms and not worry about more high tech suspension pieces unless you plan to seriously race the car.
 

Prime Lord

Crappy Default Title
Founding Member
Sep 19, 2000
2,137
199
114
Denver-ish
Jan 2, 2007
#18
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #18
As far as the rear...LCA's & UCA's. A panhard bar would only really be necessary if you're in the twisties, but it could help w/ straight line stuff as well.

As far as the front braces, they're definately NOT just for verts. My old 89 GT saw GREAT benefits from both the K-Member and strut tower braces.
 

gaslight

Founding Member
Jul 12, 2000
3,364
16
99
Maine
Jan 4, 2007
#19
  • Jan 4, 2007
  • #19
Maryland Stang said:
A pandhard bar is not usually used on the street.
Click to expand...

That is a bunch of crap. They are now used on the new stangs.
Its a great addition to the suspension. They work great on the street even if you are not into 'twisties'. Its a lot more fun driving around town.
Oh yeah...NO welding was required!
 

gaslight

Founding Member
Jul 12, 2000
3,364
16
99
Maine
Jan 4, 2007
#20
  • Jan 4, 2007
  • #20
Black Sun 5.0 said:
Does the panhard bar eliminate the upper control arm, or does it just make is not necessary to upgrade? I'm curious, because I'm resto'ing a '90 that has all stock components and I want to replace all the ratty, rusted items on the car.
Click to expand...

you can only eliminate the uppers if you have a panhard rod and a torque arm. You don't have to upgrade the uppers at this point but the lowers would be great to upgrade no matter what you do.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Suspension Rear suspension help
  • Clark302
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
323
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
Clark302
C
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Suspension Rear pinion angle
  • JD1964
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
969
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2025
JD1964
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
406
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
281
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?