• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers

  • Thread starter Thread starter hassler
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2026
H

hassler

Member
Aug 18, 2025
34
10
18
St. Louis
Mar 25, 2026
#1
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • #1
Need new tires on my car. Pretty sure the wheels are 18x9 all around. I thought the back were 18x10 but measurements all look the same.

Currently on the front are: 255/40/18 , yes they rub at full steer

Rear size: 275/35/18


I’ve read that 265/35/18 on all 4 wheels is a good size. Any opinions on this?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6537.webp
    74.3 KB · Views: 51

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,197
1,439
133
San Diego, CA
Mar 25, 2026
#2
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • #2
Well they will probably just rub more with a 265 up front.
 
H

hassler

Member
Aug 18, 2025
34
10
18
St. Louis
Mar 25, 2026
#3
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • #3
gkomo said:
Well they will probably just rub more with a 265 up front.
Click to expand...
Not too worried about the rubbing. Can fix that eventually far as I know. Just wondering what is a popular setup
 

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,197
1,439
133
San Diego, CA
Mar 25, 2026
#4
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • #4
I don’t think 265 is a ‘normal’ size for all around, not that you can’t do it. I would think if you’re keeping all tires the same it would be either 245 or 255, or a staggered size like you have now.

But that’s for like 8” wheels. Maybe 275’s all around for a 9” wheel.

Throw up a photo of the whole car I’m curious how 18’s look on a fox in all different styles.
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Mar 25, 2026
#5
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • #5
There's a difference between what is popular and what is best for overall performance. Staggered wheels and tires are very popular, but a staggered setup adds understeer to a car that was born with a tendency to understeer. If you don't have other mods to compensate for that added understeer, it's something to be aware of if you plan to use your car for performance driving.

The size of your wheels should be somewhere on the back of the wheel.

In general, a 255 is a good size for a 9” wheel. But it is popular to run 275s on a 9" wheel. Keep in mind that, despite being listed as the same size, different brands of tires can vary in size. Look at the specs for the tires you’re considering on Tire Rack. Find the Rim Width Range & the Measuring Rim Width. The MRW will let you know if the tire you want will be pinched or stretched on your wheels. There are advantages and disadvantages to pinching or stretching. You should also compare the Overall Tire Diameter to the tires you have now.

I run 245/40/18 tires on 18x9" wheels on my 1992 GT autocross car. There are some 255s that would fit up front, but I felt the 245 was the best option for my car/purpose.
 
Reactions: dan50, 85GT4V and gkomo
H

hassler

Member
Aug 18, 2025
34
10
18
St. Louis
Mar 26, 2026
#6
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • #6
gkomo said:
I don’t think 265 is a ‘normal’ size for all around, not that you can’t do it. I would think if you’re keeping all tires the same it would be either 245 or 255, or a staggered size like you have now.

But that’s for like 8” wheels. Maybe 275’s all around for a 9” wheel.

Throw up a photo of the whole car I’m curious how 18’s look on a fox in all different styles.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5589.webp
    787.1 KB · Views: 65

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,822
929
143
Mar 26, 2026
#7
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • #7
I have 255/35/18 General G-Max up front with no rub and currently have a 285/35/18 in the rear (previously had 275/35/18s). These are on 18x9 Saleen Reps with a +24 offset. I do run a 8mm spacer in the front as otherwise my rim would hit my coil-over spring (rim rub, not tire rub).


First pic with 285s, second with 275 rears. 255 fronts in both.

For my son's car we have 18x9 Bullit Reps with a +24 offset and we are going with a 245/40/18 in the front.

My belief is its tire diameter that affects tire rub the most, so the 255/35/18 (25.2" diameter) gives good footprint and not rub. Your 255/40/18 are 26.2" which is almost 0.5" taller than stock - hence rubbing.

265/35/18s are only 25.4" diameter (less than stock diameter), so would give a good footprint and likely less rubbing.
 
Last edited: Mar 26, 2026

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,950
224
Massachusetts
Mar 27, 2026
#8
  • Mar 27, 2026
  • #8
I did 245/40/18 up front on mine, and it is close. Offset of the wheel plays a role too. I had to add a little bit extra camber to my front coil-overs to get it to tuck into the fender on bumps, and had to clock the spindle/strut orientation to full out before tightening up the strut bolts.

But it did clear without contact. I did lower the car a bit after this pic. 245's on a 9" wide wheel do look a little stretched which I wasn't a fan of.
 
Reactions: gkomo
H

hassler

Member
Aug 18, 2025
34
10
18
St. Louis
May 9, 2026
#9
  • May 9, 2026
  • #9
KRUISR said:
I have 255/35/18 General G-Max up front with no rub and currently have a 285/35/18 in the rear (previously had 275/35/18s). These are on 18x9 Saleen Reps with a +24 offset. I do run a 8mm spacer in the front as otherwise my rim would hit my coil-over spring (rim rub, not tire rub).


First pic with 285s, second with 275 rears. 255 fronts in both.

For my son's car we have 18x9 Bullit Reps with a +24 offset and we are going with a 245/40/18 in the front.

My belief is its tire diameter that affects tire rub the most, so the 255/35/18 (25.2" diameter) gives good footprint and not rub. Your 255/40/18 are 26.2" which is almost 0.5" taller than stock - hence rubbing.

265/35/18s are only 25.4" diameter (less than stock diameter), so would give a good footprint and likely less rubbing.
Click to expand...
So you think 265 all around is a solid option? I’m between that option and 245/40/18 front + 275/35/18 rear. I’m unsure
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,822
929
143
May 9, 2026
#10
  • May 9, 2026
  • #10
I think 265/35/18 is the largest you can go in the front without further mods (flares, custom fenders, etc). Being slightly smaller diameter than stock gives you a better shot at minimal rubbing. It will allow for a fairly wide square set up without impacting your speedo greatly (compared to stock height).

Your other option would be a very good fitting combo as well. Being a 245 in the front will further help with potential rubbing. On my son's car we are going 245/40/18s on the front and currently have some 255/40/18s for the rear, but I am still keeping my eyes open for good deals on 275/35/18s or 285/35/18s. But we will see. Should have his car finished this summer.

What I am saying is either option would be good. The purpose and intended use is probably the most important factor you need to consider when choosing your wheel and tire combination.
 
H

hassler

Member
Aug 18, 2025
34
10
18
St. Louis
May 9, 2026
#11
  • May 9, 2026
  • #11
Think I’m gonna give the 265/35/18 all around a try with Michelin pilot sport 4S. I’m reading that this is the engineered correct setup.

Also “5/16 spacers and steering rack limiter. Should fix my ribbing at full turn. If you have any insight here or this sounds correct, would be greatly appreciated.

Bought the car from a guy who couldnt finish the build. So I’m unwinding everything that was done incorrectly. Your help and quick answers are appreciated
 
Reactions: gkomo

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,822
929
143
May 9, 2026
#12
  • May 9, 2026
  • #12
I have the 5/16 (8mm) spacers on the front because with my offset (+24mm) my rims would rub on the coil over spring. No caliper rub issue, just rim to spring rub. I do not have steering rack limiters. No rub on the inner fenders.
 
Reactions: gkomo
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
508
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
119
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Fox Another try for the European guy to get his first Fox
  • Schargedfox
  • Monday at 1:50 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Tuesday at 4:26 PM
DadLife0724
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
117
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Sunday at 5:40 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
60
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 5:40 PM
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?