Hello
Been a while since I got involved in a thread such as this one
I got involved in self tuning just after it got its start up so I
have seen a thing or two since that time
I went with a Tweecer as it was cutting edge at the time
I have looked at several other methods as they have come and gone
As I have seen it ... It kinda boils down to this
The more easy or user friendly the method .......
the less control you have to fine tune or maybe you could say ......
Your ability to finesse different parameters within the tune are not
at your disposal
On the other hand .............
Methods that give you access to most parameters will require more
use of that gray matter between your ears
I would tell you some will try and make you think you won't need to
learn much to tune your Stang
You W I L L have to invest S O M E time to at least learn the basics of
what will happen if you + or - fuel/spark :Word:
None of the methods are perfect
I do lean toward methods such as Tweecer/Q Horse simply
because they give you access to most parameters you need
to tune beyond WOT with datalogging being at the top of
the must have list
and
Being able to tune in that area (closed loop) is what seperates
the men from the boys
Last thing I would tell you is not to listen to the the suductive siren
call of a A9L pcm
Where you say the combo is gonna go with the blower and all ........
You're gonna have to tune it anyway :Word:
so
Just tune what you now got
Just a random thought or two from a hick in Texas who found a laptop
Grady