• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

C&L Intakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ucf11784
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2007

ucf11784

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
42
0
0
UCF
Jan 16, 2007
#1
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys. I am upgrading to a CAI and tune within the next week and I wanted to know the difference between the C&L intakes. I noticed the Racer intake was designed for those with heavy mods. I do plan on upgrading to a supercharger but not for a couple of years probably. Do you guys recommend going with the racer intake versus the street intake? Will I see the same power gains on both of them? Currently my only mod is Borla stinger axlebacks.
 
W

welchy

Active User
Mar 30, 2006
11
4
29
Jan 16, 2007
#2
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #2
From what I understand the main difference is the street is mad from aluminum and the racer is plastic. Other than that I believe they are identical.
 

ucf11784

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
42
0
0
UCF
Jan 16, 2007
#3
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #3
So wouldn't the plastic dissipate heat better? I mean what is the reason for the high cost aluminum version?
 
V

vynle

New Member
Oct 24, 2005
39
0
0
Jan 16, 2007
#4
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #4
the differences are the diameter and maf housings. i have the racer cai and if i had to do over id get the street ( aluminum). as far as heat, i dont believe it really makes any difference. do a search of over a yr ago and this was gone into at nausium. vynle
 
S

ski

Member
Dec 14, 2004
380
2
18
Jan 17, 2007
#5
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #5
If you plan to heavily modify the car with cams, ported heads, or a supercharger, etc., then go with the C&L racer. WRT to performance, it produces a few hp less than the street version on a stock S197.
http://www.cnlperformance.com/05-06race.html
 
8

8850

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2000
464
0
16
TX
Jan 17, 2007
#6
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #6
vynle said:
the differences are the diameter and maf housings. i have the racer cai and if i had to do over id get the street ( aluminum). as far as heat, i dont believe it really makes any difference. do a search of over a yr ago and this was gone into at nausium. vynle
Click to expand...
Why would you get the aluminum? I have the C&L Racer too. It's lighter and cheaper. Can't imagine getting a heavier one for more money. I ran a 12.907 with mine. Reinstalled the factory on back to back passes and slowed to a 13.241. .33 gain with the C&L. I used the correct tune for both passes.
 
V

vynle

New Member
Oct 24, 2005
39
0
0
Jan 17, 2007
#7
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #7
8850 said:
Why would you get the aluminum? I have the C&L Racer too. It's lighter and cheaper. Can't imagine getting a heavier one for more money. I ran a 12.907 with mine. Reinstalled the factory on back to back passes and slowed to a 13.241. .33 gain with the C&L. I used the correct tune for both passes.
Click to expand...

no real reason. i just like the aluminum better. dont get me wrong , i have a saleen s/c on now and the racer seems to have been the correct choice. it all just comes down to preferences. if they had made the " racer" aluminum i would have went with that. vynle
 
8

8850

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2000
464
0
16
TX
Jan 17, 2007
#8
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #8
vynle said:
no real reason. i just like the aluminum better. dont get me wrong , i have a saleen s/c on now and the racer seems to have been the correct choice. it all just comes down to preferences. if they had made the " racer" aluminum i would have went with that. vynle
Click to expand...
I suppose if you like the aluminum better that would be the choice. I just like the factory look of the Racer better. Just like I like my factory bulett wheels better than any of the aftermarket. Both intakes make the same hp as posted on C&L site for the mildly modded car.
 
V

vynle

New Member
Oct 24, 2005
39
0
0
Jan 17, 2007
#9
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #9
heres a pic. vynle sorry pic as to big to be posted
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
932
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
277
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
A
For Sale 2018-2023 C&L MAF and CAI Racer Kit for GT
  • alilpsi
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
1
Views
663
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Apr 14, 2024
alilpsi
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?