• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

CA Smog Fun! (But Not Really)

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94GTCoupe
  • Start date Start date Mar 5, 2013

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Mar 5, 2013
#1
  • Mar 5, 2013
  • #1
Car:
94 Mustang GT 5 Speed.
BBK Headers
Gt40 Tubular Intake
Factory converters (known good)
Timing 10º BTDC (Spout Out, advances when in)
Plugs, wires, ect all good
No codes, or check engine light
Passes KOEO, KOER and Cylinder Balance Test
Car runs perfect.

First test;
EMISSIONS PASS
VISUAL FAIL

BBK FPR not legal (my fault, should have changed it.
Intake manifold not legal (told them it was factory that I painted, problem solved)



Ok, go home and throw the stock fpr (been sitting in a box for over a year) back on and retest.

VISUAL PASS
EMISSIONS FAIL

High NO at 25 mph



So my question;
Bad FPR?

I've not had a chance to check fuel pressure yet.
Had to get to work.
 

SableSal

Member
Sep 17, 2009
295
3
19
Fresno, Californ-I-A
Mar 6, 2013
#2
  • Mar 6, 2013
  • #2
Update: I just got done going through an emission test and we swapped FPRs from mine to his. (Since my car is still down with exhaust woes.) I tell him get it smogged now! lol
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Mar 6, 2013
#3
  • Mar 6, 2013
  • #3
Wow, bad luck on the visual inspection. I had a smog guy give me a hard time about a painted part once, and he completely missed the shiny red Aeromotive fpr I had at that time. Unless you run into someone who actually knows mustangs, having a clean and painted engine bay makes you suspicious.
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Mar 6, 2013
#4
  • Mar 6, 2013
  • #4
Yeah, the first shop I went to, on Sals recommendation (thanks Sal!, haha) about had a heart attack when he looked under the hood.
Said I needed carb numbers for headers (plainly visible) coil (again, plainly visible) dizzy cap (what?) intake manifold (its a factory part) and said I HAVE TO see the referee.

Ok, update.

Rented a fuel pressure gauge last night.
Couldn't get a reliable reading, due to bad seals in the fittings (thanks AutoZone).
The one reading I got was 30lbs at idle with vacuum, without vacuum at idle it SLOWLY rose to just under 40lbs.
That was the only reading I could get.

So we swapped out mine for Sals, which is known good.

This morning I cleared and reset the computer, backed timing up to 8º BTDC 1/4 tank of premium and a bottle of octane booster.

Took a drive on the freeway and straight to test.
Well what do you know, it passed!


still suspect it was a bad fpr so I'll be buying a fuel pressure gauge and checking it out later.
In the mean time, I'll be putting my BBK fpr back on.

Again, thanks a lot for the help Sal!
 

Attachments

  • 20130306_104150.webp
    31.7 KB · Views: 206
  • 20130306_104150.webp
    31.7 KB · Views: 202
Reactions: SableSal

SableSal

Member
Sep 17, 2009
295
3
19
Fresno, Californ-I-A
Mar 9, 2013
#5
  • Mar 9, 2013
  • #5
Anytime Harvey! Now to get my headers figured out... UGH! lol
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Mar 9, 2013
#6
  • Mar 9, 2013
  • #6
God damn your exhaust!
Haha.
 

SableSal

Member
Sep 17, 2009
295
3
19
Fresno, Californ-I-A
Mar 10, 2013
#7
  • Mar 10, 2013
  • #7
Hey at least I decided to start fresh lol
 
S

sluggish88

New Member
Aug 8, 2013
4
0
2
Aug 8, 2013
#8
  • Aug 8, 2013
  • #8
hey davis3, i know you passed the emissions test already but did you ever figure out the reason as to why you didnt pass? was it a bad fpr? did you ever consider that it might have been your timing was off? you went from not passing with 10*, to passing with 8.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Aug 8, 2013
#9
  • Aug 8, 2013
  • #9
Timimg shouldnt of caused you to fail. I passed CA smog at 14 degrees and same for NJ emissions this year

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Aug 8, 2013
#10
  • Aug 8, 2013
  • #10
Agreed, it wasn't the timing.
I believe my old, factory fpr was bad.
 

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 8, 2013
#11
  • Aug 8, 2013
  • #11
Based on everything you've mentioned about the FPR, I would guess that the rail pressure was low and you were running lean. Lean conditions will result in high NOx emissions due to the extra oxygen. Backing the timing down a bit can sometimes help because NOx formation during combustion is a combination of pressure and temeprature, however temperature and extra O2 are the most significant factors. I'm glad you got it resolved. Those CA inspections don't sound fun!
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 8, 2013
#12
  • Aug 8, 2013
  • #12
chaos254 said:
Timimg shouldnt of caused you to fail. I passed CA smog at 14 degrees and same for NJ emissions this year

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...

Timing can definately cause you to fail. Pulling the spout to get a 5.0 to pass is one of the oldest tricks in the books.

Kurt
 
S

sluggish88

New Member
Aug 8, 2013
4
0
2
Aug 8, 2013
#13
  • Aug 8, 2013
  • #13
I still say it might have been your timing.. Reason being?? Timing controls at what point the combustion in your engine is ignited. More timing= combustion being created faster= more emissions. FWIW I know for a FACT that the stock timing should be 8*. Anyone please correct me if I'm wrong! Just a 20 year old kid who's new to the mustang scene..
Chaos254 if you're passing in CA at 14* let me get that hook up!! haha..
 

94GTCoupe

10 Year Member
May 7, 2006
1,412
92
79
CA
Aug 9, 2013
#14
  • Aug 9, 2013
  • #14
Base timing is 10º btdc from the factory.
I only backed it off just to be safe.

It wasn't the timing in my case, as the only thing that changed between the pass and fail was the fpr.

Don't know what else to tell you
 

hssnpny

Member
May 30, 2002
49
0
7
SoCal
Aug 9, 2013
#15
  • Aug 9, 2013
  • #15
In my case (2 weeks ago) they came out with a timing light and pulled the spout to verify I was running factory timing. If its not its an automatic fail. Funny how they don't all check the same things.
 

SableSal

Member
Sep 17, 2009
295
3
19
Fresno, Californ-I-A
Aug 10, 2013
#16
  • Aug 10, 2013
  • #16
Some smog guys are more jerks than others.
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Aug 12, 2013
#17
  • Aug 12, 2013
  • #17
hssnpny said:
In my case (2 weeks ago) they came out with a timing light and pulled the spout to verify I was running factory timing. If its not its an automatic fail. Funny how they don't all check the same things.
Click to expand...

Wow. I've never had a smog guy check my timing here in SoCal, ever. You must have gone to someone who was really strict.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
A
Help with engine issues/emissions
  • Artyom
  • Apr 11, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 12, 2024
Mindseye007
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?