• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Centrifugal, Blowers, Chargers, Roots? can some one explain the differences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpencB
  • Start date Start date Dec 6, 2003
S

SpencB

New Member
May 31, 2003
388
0
0
Ontario, Canada
Dec 6, 2003
#1
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #1
Can someone please put into 'caveman' terms, what exactly are the differences between this mass variety of power adders?

thanks alot
 

Starscream88

New Member
Mar 8, 2003
1,277
1
0
Park Ridge NJ
Dec 6, 2003
#2
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #2
Centrifigal Usually looks like a turbo, With a pulley on the back which turns the compressor whell according to the engines RPM, the more RPM the more boost that can be made and is forced into the Engine by a intake pipe.

Twin Screw, Roots, Take the place of the upper intake and using 2 compressor wheels that look like twizzles candy next to each other, they literally screw the air downward into the engine. Again Pulley driven so according to Engine RPM is the power they will deliver.

Turbocharger, My personal fave, this is exhaust driven, There are 2 compressor wheels on a shaft inside the turbo, The exhaust air passed through one which turns the other, The other is what blows air into the engine,

Thats the shortest explanation,
If you want a more in depth guide with visual aids go to howstuffworks.com and look in the auto section.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 6, 2003
#3
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #3
Turbo is my FI of choice too. Just one clarification though: Technically, the roots type (positive displacement) blower isn't a compressor, as it simply takes the air coming in the top and blows it down into the engine. A twin screw takes the air coming in the back of the case, and compresses it as it "screws" it to the front and down into the engine.
 

Mattsmustang

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
112
0
0
Kansas
Dec 6, 2003
#4
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #4
i always wanted to know the difference too
thank you,
matthew
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 6, 2003
#5
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #5
Breakdown:
A centrifugal compresses air internally, and is better designed for high boost, high rpm applications. (think drag racing) The turbine has to spin astronomically fast, so the tollerances allowed in production have to be more exact than the others, with almost no parasitic drag.

A roots type is literally a blower, and the compression takes place in the intake manifold ports. Less mechanically and thermally efficient, but makes huge low end torque right from idle. Very fun in a street car.

A twin screw blower produces the same nice flat torque curve early in the rpm band that the roots does, but is far more efficient, quieter, better hood clearance, but is usually more expensive. It is typically easier to make higher boost levels with them than the roots type.
 
R

redterror302

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2002
895
0
0
Mertztown, PA or State College, PA
Dec 6, 2003
#6
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #6
So the 03 Cobra has a twin screw blower right, because the air comes into the back of the case?
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 6, 2003
#7
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #7
Yes and no. The Cobra has the same Eaton M-112 blower that the Lightning has, which is a roots type. However, unlike the Lightning, it has been modified to have a rear entrance for hood clearance purposes, making it a kind of hybrid. It isn't a twin screw, but it does have some of the increased efficiency of one. Right now the hot mother of upgrades for the Terminater is the Kenny Bell twin screw blower, which can spin up more than 20psi of boost. You'll never get a stock Ford Eaton M-112 to do that, the rotors are still different inside and there still isn't a whole lot more compression in the blower itself. So theoretically yes, kindof; technically no.
 
R

redterror302

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2002
895
0
0
Mertztown, PA or State College, PA
Dec 6, 2003
#8
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #8
thanks for the explanation, makes sense now.
 

Jkstang78

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2002
1,510
1
38
long island N.Y.
Dec 6, 2003
#9
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #9
Here are a few site that explain this stuff

http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/TechServ/TechInfo/SCTech.html

http://www.fordvschevy.com/tech/tbsc/tbsc.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
676
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
733
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
2001 v6 heater return pipe leak question
  • mnky99
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
254
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Nov 11, 2025
mnky99
M
Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?