• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

cheapest aluminum heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steel1212
  • Start date Start date Sep 2, 2004
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Sep 2, 2004
#1
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #1
Is the gt-40y the cheapest aluminum heads and how good are they? I know everybody lives and breaths AFR's and Twisted wedge but if I could pick up a pair of cheap heads for say 600 or so would it be worth it or should I just get some windsor jr. iron heads?
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Sep 2, 2004
#2
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #2
I donno if you want to get "cheap" heads. Alum. expands at a different rate then the iron block, so If you have cheap heads with bad tolerances, then you very well might get leakage issues.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Sep 2, 2004
#3
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #3
6Stang7 said:
I donno if you want to get "cheap" heads. Alum. expands at a different rate then the iron block, so If you have cheap heads with bad tolerances, then you very well might get leakage issues.
Click to expand...

There is nothing "cheap" about any of the heads Ford sells through the FRPP program. They are of the highest quality and are the easiest true bolt on aluminum head to install. The GT-40Y heads are the original aluminum offering from Ford and the design is almost 10 years old so they are cheaper than other heads on the market for this very reason. They are not of cheap construction or materials and make very decent horsepower and can be ported to make even more. They are still a very vialbe option for the budget minded person looking to upgrade to aluminum heads. They will not leak due to differences in material. They have a very thick deck and can even be milled for higher compression.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Sep 3, 2004
#4
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #4
Just remember one thing

The below quote is the sig of one of the stangers here and I think it is pretty accurate;

Cheap ain't good and good ain't cheap
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Sep 3, 2004
#5
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #5
So if cheap ain't good and good ain't cheap then I guess everybody that wants new heads spends 1500 on the heads and then has them machined....no. They look for good cost effective alternatives, like Ronstang said the gt-40y heads. Last time I looked I haven't seen any CHEAP aluminium heads anyway.

Ronstang would the gt-40y heads be better than say the windsor Jr. heads in performance? I know I'm going to give up a lot of weight but its not like I'm running a lot of weight in my 65 anyway.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Sep 3, 2004
#6
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #6
u can pick up a set of used performer heads for under $700 usually.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Sep 3, 2004
#7
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #7
steel1212 said:
So if cheap ain't good and good ain't cheap then I guess everybody that wants new heads spends 1500 on the heads and then has them machined....no. They look for good cost effective alternatives, like Ronstang said the gt-40y heads. Last time I looked I haven't seen any CHEAP aluminium heads anyway.

Ronstang would the gt-40y heads be better than say the windsor Jr. heads in performance? I know I'm going to give up a lot of weight but its not like I'm running a lot of weight in my 65 anyway.
Click to expand...

I went through 3 different heads before settling on the Edelbrocks. First up were Windsor alum heads. Now Flatlander Racing won't sell them anymore. Give them a call and hear what they have to say about the World Products heads. I voiced my concerns to the machine shop doing my car but they said it was all bs and bolted up the Windsor Jrs. When my builder got the block back from the machine shop, he noticed that the heads leaked and generally sucked. He then went with TF twisted wedge but the springs busted on the dyno when he was breaking in the engine. He took those back and went with the edelbrocks only because he could not find any AFRs for my 351. I would have to guess that the Ford heads would have to be better than the worlds only because the latter don't seem to be well made.

anyways, this topic has been discussed in several threads here in the past.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=483598&highlight=gt40+heads
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Felpro 9333 pt1 (with 8psi boost)
  • JD1964
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
736
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
B
SN95 New Heads
  • Blakeknight
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
949
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
Noobz347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
472
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
649
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?