• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

crown vic 4.6 swap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adams91LX
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Dec 14, 2009
#1
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #1
So I found a lightly 4.6 engine/trans with all the accessories for 400... it's from a 94 crown vic...

would it be worth swapping into a fox?

How many parts would need to be swapped to get any power out of it?

thanks
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Dec 14, 2009
#2
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #2
Hell no!!! A 94 4.6 motor is non pi (non performance improved) & most likely has about 200hp @ the crank. The only 4.6 worth swapping in IMO would be a 4V....

To get any power out of that 94 motor, you would need 99-04 heads/cams/intake, & that would only put you at PI motor specs which were roughly 265 hp/300 tq.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Dec 14, 2009
#3
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #3
meaning too much work to get power out of.... sucks... 400 bucks is pretty cheap for running engine/trans...
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Dec 14, 2009
#4
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #4
Adams91LX said:
meaning too much work to get power out of.... sucks... 400 bucks is pretty cheap for running engine/trans...
Click to expand...

Definitely. It is a very good, reliable motor, BUT, not much of a powerhouse & not worth all the work... I will bet you it only puts down about 175rwhp LOL...
 

Chrome_Rust

Member
Dec 5, 2008
530
1
17
Findlay, Ohio
Dec 14, 2009
#5
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #5
A 2v 4.6 could be a good swap, but the pre 96 4.6's are JUNK! I have a Crown Vic fetish and can tell you all the difference between them. If you are looking at Vic engines get anything after 2001. That is when they went to the PI stuff, also the 4.6 in the 2004 and later cars are rated @ 250hp, exacly the same engine as the 260hp 'Stang engine.

On the 94 engine, if it is still in the car and you can hear it run, and it isnt smoking to beat the band (pre 96 have problems with valve seals) and you can get it ALOT cheaper then buy it and tinker. But the throttle body is at the rear of the manifold, and the intakes flow like crap. also they are only rated at 195 Civvy and 210 Police HP. Sorry for the disjointed post... I'm tired.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Dec 14, 2009
#6
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #6
have any idea what parts would have to be swapped to make it worthwhile?
 

Chrome_Rust

Member
Dec 5, 2008
530
1
17
Findlay, Ohio
Dec 14, 2009
#7
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #7
Adams91LX said:
have any idea what parts would have to be swapped to make it worthwhile?
Click to expand...

Keep the oil cap, and swap everything under it for anything 2001 or later....
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Dec 14, 2009
#8
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #8
Chrome_Rust said:
Keep the oil cap, and swap everything under it for anything 2001 or later....
Click to expand...

I lauged so hard when i read this...

 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 14, 2009
#9
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #9
The '92-'95 Romeo engines were not only down on power, but also amongst the least desirable of all the Modular blocks. As stated...the heads and intake are junk and the short block itself isn't much better, as are most of the linkages. The earlier F2VE iron blocks although not completely weak, are inferior to the '96-up F6/F7 blocks. The earlier blocks us 4 cross bolted mains, where the later blocks have 5.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Dec 14, 2009
#10
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #10
As much as i love mod swaps, a 94 vic motor is not one i'd use.

If anything look for a PI motor, or maybe even a 93-98 Mark 8 4V engine.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 14, 2009
#11
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #11
Mustang5L5 said:
As much as i love mod swaps, a 94 vic motor is not one i'd use.

If anything look for a PI motor, or maybe even a 93-98 Mark 8 4V engine.
Click to expand...
I see a lot of these in my local yard. I was wondering if a cobra intake would wake that beast up and make it a worthwhile swap.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Dec 14, 2009
#12
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #12
Why stop there?




There are 3 mark 8's at my local yard. I wonder how much i could snag an engine for.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 14, 2009
#13
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #13
Bill is going to shat himself if you let him see that. its even the same color as his.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Dec 14, 2009
#14
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #14
If your going to do a 4.6L swap get one from a Mustang. 99-04 are the most desirable for a 2V. But even if you get a 96-98, that's waaay better than trying to make one work from a Crown Vic. You are gonna run into all sorts of trouble.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 14, 2009
#15
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #15
if for some reason you REALLY want to stay with a 2v. find one of those mark8 32v motors and throw a set of 2v PI heads on them good things happen
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Dec 14, 2009
#16
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #16
stykthyn said:
I see a lot of these in my local yard. I was wondering if a cobra intake would wake that beast up and make it a worthwhile swap.
Click to expand...

if you have a 97-98 mark 8, swapping a kewbra unit on will make maybe 5 hp more lol..
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Dec 14, 2009
#17
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #17
srtthis said:
if for some reason you REALLY want to stay with a 2v. find one of those mark8 32v motors and throw a set of 2v PI heads on them good things happen
Click to expand...

32v means its a 4v not a 2v why would you swap out b heads for some pi heads? npi heads flow more anyway, its not the heads that are bad its the cams/intake..
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 14, 2009
#18
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #18
Mr. Rustypwnz said:
32v means its a 4v not a 2v why would you swap out b heads for some pi heads? npi heads flow more anyway, its not the heads that are bad its the cams/intake..
Click to expand...

First....he realized that 32V means the engine is a 4V. The actual point behind the swap is cutting some serious weight with the aluminum block and adding a pile of compression to the engine by combining the 2V top end and the 4V bottom end. The B-heads do outflow both the PI and NPI heads, but they do so at the expense of added weight and low end torque production.

Second....NPI heads don't outflow PI heads. Maybe after serious porting a difference will be realized, but stock out of the box the PI heads school the old NPI castings. But yes, the cams and intake are trash on the NPI heads too.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 14, 2009
#19
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #19
Gearbanger ftw... COMPRESSION!!!
Posted via Mobile Device
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Dec 14, 2009
#20
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #20
Gearbanger 101 said:
First....he realized that 32V means the engine is a 4V. The actual point behind the swap is cutting some serious weight with the aluminum block and adding a pile of compression to the engine by combining the 2V top end and the 4V bottom end.
Click to expand...



How would that compare to the 3V 4.6L? I've read it clocks in at 420 pounds fully dressed. That seems pretty light.

I'd imagine there would be a flood of 3V's available in the boneyards with all the 05-10 Mustangs and 04-10 F150's in the boneyards in the next few years.

Seems a nice chunk of weight off the nose and some good performance potential




Here's another sick twisted though...what's the new 3.7L wiegh in at?? It is all Aluminum right? 305HP too? EVen though it's a V6, that's Cobra engine HP right there. 275 ft-lbs of torque is a little weak, but a light coupe and some 4.10's will fix that. Add a nice power adder and that might be a light but pwerful combo
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
117
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Q
Resolved 96 crown Vic ECU in a mustang gt
  • QuickDibbles
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
704
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
228
Other Auto Tech Monday at 1:17 PM
General karthief
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
708
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?