• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Curious about blowers and brakes.

  • Thread starter Thread starter LaserSVT
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2009

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,536
233
Jun 14, 2009
#1
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #1
I see the aftermarket has really embraced the SN197s and there are some nice parts out there

I was curious about two of them. I see for $700 you can get the GT500 brakes! 4-piston Brembos for $700 sounds like a deal to me! Anyone have them and how do you like them? Any issues?

The other thing is the new Eddelbrock blower kit. Anyone have one yet? If it can supply that much volume at 5 psi to make such great numbers then with some forged internals and 12 psi you could see 700+ rwhp on these things! How are the 3V blocks? Can they handle that?


Sorry for all the questions but I would like to learn more about the SN197s
 

Steel Horse

Member
Oct 28, 2008
0
0
16
Altoona, IA
Jun 14, 2009
#2
  • Jun 14, 2009
  • #2
HeavyGT just got the GT500 brakes. We are waiting for him to update us on how well they work. The only issue I know he had was rim clearance. Thats why those rims will soon find their way onto my car.

I think people are waiting to see how well the Edelbrock kit works before they start buying them(I've heard some guys are having some issues with them, not sure what though). The general concensus here is to go with a Kenne Bell, Whipple, or Roush TVS for big power numbers. These blowers will more than outpower the stock internals on these motors.

The blocks are plenty strong (capable of handling 700 or more hp) but the rods and pistons are the weak link. Lots of guys running around 500hp on stock internals but that seems to be very close to the breaking point.
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Jun 15, 2009
#3
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #3
LaserSVT said:
The other thing is the new Eddelbrock blower kit. Anyone have one yet? If it can supply that much volume at 5 psi to make such great numbers then with some forged internals and 12 psi you could see 700+ rwhp on these things! How are the 3V blocks? Can they handle that?
Click to expand...

I've seen an Edelbrock E-Force on an '06 GT at our local dyno shop. It put down 400+ rwhp with the standard pulley & air box (engine was otherwise stock). However, it was pushing a little over 7 psi, not the 5 psi that it is claimed to run. That makes the hp less amazing, IMO. Nice set up, though, that runs very cool - even with the smaller pulley sizes.

Stock 3V can handle a lot of power (at least 450 rwhp), but only if safely tuned.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,536
233
Jun 15, 2009
#4
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #4
Great info so far! Was curious how true the S/C claim was. Looks like a nice unit but I wondered how it compared to other positive displacment S/C's out. It sure seems expensive at $5800, are the Whipple kits cheaper with a cooler?

Also, being that psi is a measure of restiction, what were the other mods on the car? I could see 2 less psi and 30+ more RWHP if the had a full exhaust and long tubes. Do you know what that test car had on it?


I have also heard that the GT500 brakes can fail their piston seals if you track raced it due to excessive heat and that the seals are not replaceable. Is this true?
 

Steel Horse

Member
Oct 28, 2008
0
0
16
Altoona, IA
Jun 15, 2009
#5
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #5
LaserSVT said:
Great info so far! Was curious how true the S/C claim was. Looks like a nice unit but I wondered how it compared to other positive displacment S/C's out. It sure seems expensive at $5800, are the Whipple kits cheaper with a cooler?

Also, being that psi is a measure of restiction, what were the other mods on the car? I could see 2 less psi and 30+ more RWHP if the had a full exhaust and long tubes. Do you know what that test car had on it?


I have also heard that the GT500 brakes can fail their piston seals if you track raced it due to excessive heat and that the seals are not replaceable. Is this true?
Click to expand...

The stock exhaust is actually very good. You won't see huge gains by going aftermarket. Once again most any twinscrew will blow up the stock motor with no outside help adding power. Changing the exhaust is more for sound than big power gains. I've heard LTs are good for a few hp but I have yet to see a dyno graph to back that up.
 

Preston951

New Member
Nov 17, 2008
95
1
0
Hot as hell, Arizona
Jun 15, 2009
#6
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #6
I spent a bunch of time on this F/I write up... It has all the info you need!
S197 Supercharger & Turbocharger Specs - Ford Mustang Forums
 

Preston951

New Member
Nov 17, 2008
95
1
0
Hot as hell, Arizona
Jun 15, 2009
#7
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #7
Steel Horse said:
The stock exhaust is actually very good. You won't see huge gains by going aftermarket. Once again most any twinscrew will blow up the stock motor with no outside help adding power. Changing the exhaust is more for sound than big power gains. I've heard LTs are good for a few hp but I have yet to see a dyno graph to back that up.
Click to expand...

Well... I've seen quite a few people with long tubes, aftermarket h pipe and aftermarket mufflers make some significant gains once going F/I.

This is a good example:
Stock exhaust - 10 psi ~ 450 hp
Aftermarket exhaust - 8.5 psi ~ 462 hp

With less back pressure the engine runs at a lower psi without a pulley change...!!!
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,536
233
Jun 15, 2009
#8
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #8
Preston951 said:
I spent a bunch of time on this F/I write up... It has all the info you need!
S197 Supercharger & Turbocharger Specs - Ford Mustang Forums
Click to expand...
Excellent.

After reading that it seems the Edelbrock kit is not overpriced at all. Man there are some nice FI kits for those cars, you guys have some nice stuff to chose from.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Jun 15, 2009
#9
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #9
I think also the reason why the E-Force runs really cool is because of A. the design of the intake part, and B. the fact that they supply a very large intercooler to go with it.
 

klaw

Member
Oct 11, 2007
343
0
16
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 15, 2009
#10
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #10
I went with the Whipple HO kit last year at 10psi and really enjoyed it. The kit was time-consuming to install but not difficult and was very complete. The only issue I had with the Whipple was the 6-rib drive. I never had any trouble with it but never really trusted it either.

I also found that the stock brakes weren't very good especially after going FI.

This year I decided to upgrade the engine including adding the new Steeda 10-rib drive. I also did the Baer 6P brakes. The brakes are pricey but are very nice. Some pics/videos of the new setup are near the bottom of the following thread:

http://forums.stangnet.com/788201-spring-2009-build.html

I wouldn't hesitate to go with another Whipple.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Jun 15, 2009
#11
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #11
klaw said:
I went with the Whipple HO kit last year at 10psi and really enjoyed it. The kit was time-consuming to install but not difficult and was very complete. The only issue I had with the Whipple was the 6-rib drive. I never had any trouble with it but never really trusted it either.

I also found that the stock brakes weren't very good especially after going FI.

This year I decided to upgrade the engine including adding the new Steeda 10-rib drive. I also did the Baer 6P brakes. The brakes are pricey but are very nice. Some pics/videos of the new setup are near the bottom of the following thread:

http://forums.stangnet.com/788201-spring-2009-build.html

I wouldn't hesitate to go with another Whipple.
Click to expand...

The stock brakes are inadequate PERIOD.
 

klaw

Member
Oct 11, 2007
343
0
16
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 15, 2009
#12
  • Jun 15, 2009
  • #12
walter said:
The stock brakes are inadequate PERIOD.
Click to expand...

haha - OK I was being polite!
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Jun 16, 2009
#13
  • Jun 16, 2009
  • #13
klaw said:
haha - OK I was being polite!
Click to expand...

I never sugarcoat safety hazards and since day 1 that's what the brakes on a Mustang have been.
 

Steel Horse

Member
Oct 28, 2008
0
0
16
Altoona, IA
Jun 16, 2009
#14
  • Jun 16, 2009
  • #14
Preston951 said:
Well... I've seen quite a few people with long tubes, aftermarket h pipe and aftermarket mufflers make some significant gains once going F/I.

This is a good example:
Stock exhaust - 10 psi ~ 450 hp
Aftermarket exhaust - 8.5 psi ~ 462 hp

With less back pressure the engine runs at a lower psi without a pulley change...!!!
Click to expand...

I understand it lower manifold pressure and makes more power but is the 1000+ dollars for an aftermarket exhaust system to get 12 extra hp really worth it on a street car? I wouldn't call that significant enough to justify the price.
 

Preston951

New Member
Nov 17, 2008
95
1
0
Hot as hell, Arizona
Jun 17, 2009
#15
  • Jun 17, 2009
  • #15
Steel Horse said:
I understand it lower manifold pressure and makes more power but is the 1000+ dollars for an aftermarket exhaust system to get 12 extra hp really worth it on a street car? I wouldn't call that significant enough to justify the price.
Click to expand...

Oh no doubt! I totally agree with you. The stock system is more than adequate.

Pretty much what it comes down to is sound! Once you've done everything else but exhaust, why not, you know?

The 12 hp was just an example ... I've seen people gain 44+ rwhp with Kooks LTs (& appropriate tune) alone! Lowering the manifold pressure could also let you bump up the boost a little and add some more HP without bending a rod!

I do agree that as far as your average person goes, exhaust changes aren't too useful. Unless you know what you're doing, that is!
 
O

orange 07

New Member
Oct 10, 2006
115
0
0
Jun 19, 2009
#16
  • Jun 19, 2009
  • #16
I like my GT500 brakes, no issues and that is with track time braking from 130mph down to 50-60 mph three times a lap plus 11 other turns. The only downside I see is the pad selection is limited. Check out Hawk or EBC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
supercharging my v6 4.0
  • dreamerv6stang
  • Jan 12, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Jul 21, 2025
tovlux6
T
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
123
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
880
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?