• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

december 5.0 magazine sc vs. hci

  • Thread starter Thread starter wgpaintballer
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
W

wgpaintballer

New Member
Oct 7, 2005
49
0
0
Oct 17, 2006
#1
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #1
They did a test with a novi 2000 and a edelbrock hci to see whats better 1st although the sc costed more at first in the long run it was cheaper and made more power...

and suggestions?
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Oct 17, 2006
#2
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #2
hci is much more fun.
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Oct 17, 2006
#3
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #3
Yeah on a fresh motor a charger is the way to go. But on an old worn out one I would hci it with a fresh rebuild at the least.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Oct 17, 2006
#4
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #4
i would think that all motor would be more fun.
 

Snikt89GT

New Member
Sep 6, 2006
264
1
0
Deland, Florida
Oct 17, 2006
#5
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #5
HCI would be more reliable and easier to tune I would think
 
G

GT89Mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
0
0
0
Monmouth County, NJ
Oct 17, 2006
#6
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #6
Both, and have double the power.
 

bynummustang

Seen my other Jackstand?
Jul 24, 2005
1
2
69
NC State University
Oct 17, 2006
#7
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #7
HCI

Its more satisfying*sp when you make that high HP number all motor. Sure you can save a little money with a charger, or even a big wet shot, but I say its more fun, and more of an accomplishment to go N/A.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 17, 2006
#8
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #8
E7s, stock cam and a Cobra intake is the funnest... !

DO what YOU want do. In the end you can have both and make great power!
 

90

Active Member
Sep 24, 2006
0
1
43
Michigan insane asylum
Oct 17, 2006
#9
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #9
GT89Mustang said:
Both, and have double the power.
Click to expand...


sure why not!
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Oct 17, 2006
#10
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #10
25thmustang said:
E7s, stock cam and a Cobra intake is the funnest... !

DO what YOU want do. In the end you can have both and make great power!
Click to expand...

but you need to port those heads to make anywhere near the power, and while you're spending money on porting, new springs, and new valves..you might as well get aluminums to shave 45 pounds off your front end.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Oct 17, 2006
#11
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #11
They did that one before, but it was against a Vortec SC. SC made more power, but they didn't even get 300 to the wheels with the edelbrock system,, at least in the old magzine. They should have it against the TFS system. Keep your stock engine, and just order a hellion kit. It will cost you about the same as both the SC and HCI, probally a little less, but you'll beat the SC and HCI combined car.

I would like to see a competition between a
Tmoss-Thumper combo vs. Edelbrock Combo.
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Oct 17, 2006
#12
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #12
what does "costed" mean??
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 18, 2006
#13
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #13
91ghp5.0 said:
but you need to port those heads to make anywhere near the power, and while you're spending money on porting, new springs, and new valves..you might as well get aluminums to shave 45 pounds off your front end.
Click to expand...

Whose ported??? Mine arent and I have a stock cam, yet still threw down 272/316 on a dynojet! Throw a custom grind, port them and a better intake than a Cobra and who knows what the E7s will do.

And although I still have the 45 lbs, the $600 less than AFR 165s I spent went towards other things that helped me out! Hey I even have the battery up front, and a stock hood I can shave weight with!

Costed is a word my sister chooses to use. Maybe its a younger generation thing?
 

Nopantz

New Member
May 26, 2003
234
0
0
NJ/US Merchant Marine Academy
Oct 18, 2006
#14
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #14
90mustangGT said:
They did that one before, but it was against a Vortec SC. SC made more power, but they didn't even get 300 to the wheels with the edelbrock system,, at least in the old magzine. They should have it against the TFS system. Keep your stock engine, and just order a hellion kit. It will cost you about the same as both the SC and HCI, probally a little less, but you'll beat the SC and HCI combined car.
Click to expand...

I dont know if the hellion kit would be more.....I think it costs $4500+ where as the tfs kit, a new fuel pump, injectors, maf, etc. will run you just about $3000. yea the hellion kit includes all of that but i still dont think it will end up added up to the same amount... i may be wrong though cause the hellion kit also includes stuff like an electric fan

edit: It is HP Performance who offers an electric fan with their kit....HP's Kit is $4495 and Hellions is about $4995. Has anyone heard any updates with Project Hooligan (MM&FF stock 5.0 with the HP Kit running 10s) That car makes me want to do a turbo before any other mods
 

$uperstang

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
476
1
0
Detroit, MI
Oct 18, 2006
#15
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #15
25thmustang said:
Whose ported??? Mine arent and I have a stock cam, yet still threw down 272/316 on a dynojet! Throw a custom grind, port them and a better intake than a Cobra and who knows what the E7s will do.

And although I still have the 45 lbs, the $600 less than AFR 165s I spent went towards other things that helped me out! Hey I even have the battery up front, and a stock hood I can shave weight with!

Costed is a word my sister chooses to use. Maybe its a younger generation thing?
Click to expand...

Damn, you probably have the fastest stock mustang in the WORLD! with those times in your sig. I have a 325 stroker with 305/361 to the tires and only run a 12.5 on Drag radials.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 18, 2006
#16
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #16
$uperstang said:
Damn, you probably have the fastest stock mustang in the WORLD! with those times in your sig. I have a 325 stroker with 305/361 to the tires and only run a 12.5 on Drag radials.
Click to expand...

Its not stock though, or even close, I just run E7s, stock cam, stock bottem end, stock suspension. Theres a good deal more than exhaust and gears needed to run mid 12s!
 
3

310stanger

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
170
1
0
Oct 18, 2006
#17
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #17
what they dont tell you is how much snappier a hci is then jus a stock motor with a blower. most centrifugal on non modified motors arent as snotty as youd think they are. i agree with aliate x on the hci being more fun. plus you should start off with the hci and then put the blower on later. it saves you work which this article also stated. if jus throwing a charger on was the way to go there would be no aftermarket for heads and intakes. i also think they should have used the trickflow package and not the edelbrock, as the trickflow package uses better heads that utitlize stud mount roller rockers and a better cam. the cam in the eddy kit is an e303. the best part of the eddy kit is that intake. that novi 2000 blower though is very badass. if i were to go the centrifugal route, thats the blower id get. it can support 1000 horses. my coworker is using one on a 347.
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Oct 18, 2006
#18
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #18
I think its funny how everyone is saying H/C/I but has no real experience with a stock blown car




Here is my take on it.. I have a stock intake to oil pan car.. I have an SC-trim vortech (@ 10psi) and full exhaust.


Hmm.. I installed the blower in 4 hours... it cost me a total of $1,700 bucks.

Pretty much all H/C/I kits cost more than that.. take much more time to install and are generally a larger pain in the butt.

And in the end... I can still run with all the basic H/C/I cars, maintain perfect streetability, and my HWY gas mileage actually went up (city took a dive though).

I dunno guys.. Im pretty satisfied with my route. It was cheaper, easier, and a little more effective.

Plus, If i decide to sell the car I can return it back to stock in one afternoon.

(i do have a mexican 331 H/C/I engine in the works though... which I will put my blower on when it gets done.... so yea.. to the guy that said both )
 
F

fiveofanatic

How to fuel a Mustang:
Founding Member
Aug 12, 1998
8,152
0
76
Phoenix, AZ suburbs
Oct 18, 2006
#19
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #19
Un-natural aspiration FTW.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Oct 18, 2006
#20
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #20
poneypower89 said:
I think its funny how everyone is saying H/C/I but has no real experience with a stock blown car




Here is my take on it.. I have a stock intake to oil pan car.. I have an SC-trim vortech (@ 10psi) and full exhaust.


Hmm.. I installed the blower in 4 hours... it cost me a total of $1,700 bucks.

Pretty much all H/C/I kits cost more than that.. take much more time to install and are generally a larger pain in the butt.

And in the end... I can still run with all the basic H/C/I cars, maintain perfect streetability, and my HWY gas mileage actually went up (city took a dive though).

I dunno guys.. Im pretty satisfied with my route. It was cheaper, easier, and a little more effective.

Plus, If i decide to sell the car I can return it back to stock in one afternoon.

(i do have a mexican 331 H/C/I engine in the works though... which I will put my blower on when it gets done.... so yea.. to the guy that said both )
Click to expand...

what did you do for tuning? just mess with the FMU?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
577
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
L
5.0 Weird Tech Issue
  • Lowpass
  • Jun 9, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
336
Other Auto Tech Jun 10, 2025
Lowpass
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?