• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Decisions Decisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiddiccarus
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2006

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Oct 20, 2006
#1
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #1
I am at a crossroad here guys. I have already posted this in the OT forum and got an answer so I am coming here to ask the same thing. I know that you all are partial to the 2.3T but I ask this from you all that have one installed already and need honest answers not just BS spewing.

I need to make a decisison soon on what engine I am going to put in the 93. I have just gotten her back from the shop to have the front end straightened out and ready for body parts.

I have 2 86 Merkur Blocks in the garage and was thinking of building one up to a 86 SVO spec and then some. My other option would be to make a 302 sleeper out of it.

Now these are the questions that I need to answer before I make a final decision.

1. How hard has it been for you all to find parts for general maint on the SVO's?

2. I know that I can get 25-30 mpg out of the SVO if I keep out of the turbine but would the mpg on a 302 be that much worse? This is not planned to be a DD, it will be a spare car and a play thing for me and the G/F

3. I want a fun car to play with and to show off. I know that some of you have both a V8/V6 and a 2.3t so which car gives you the most pleasure honestly?

I dont want a Money Pit but I do intend on spending some money on the car to make it enjoyable. As always I do not care about "stock" looks at all and Unique is a good thing too. If I do stick with the 2.3T I plan to visit Stingers shop for parts, if not I will sell it all for a new powerplant.
 

rgosulliv

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2001
430
0
0
Lawrenceville NJ
Oct 20, 2006
#2
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #2
my opinion...

I like the Unique which is personally why I went with the two mustangs I have. A 2.3L turbo powered stang and a '04 Mach 1. Both cars different from the "norm" that you don't see much of.

As for which one gives me more pleasure I'd say they are both about the same. The V8 has the reliable power that is always there and the turbo four has the put you in the back of your seat torque that's there when you spool it up.

I think whichever way you go you'll be happy with the result.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 20, 2006
#3
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #3
I think a built v8 would be a more reliable powerplant.
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Oct 20, 2006
#4
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #4
Yeah I am thinking the same thing and also the parts are easier to find and less manufactuing involved. Price is not my major factor in this decision but ease and dependiability is
 

mg man

Member
Jun 24, 2006
142
0
16
Oct 21, 2006
#5
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #5
Here is my 2 cents worth. My wife's is a 88 2.3 turbo I piece together. We went to NMRA in Bowling Green KY entered the car in the car show.Remember daily drive 18 year old paint. One dent. People would pass up the other v-8's to look at ours. Really surprized me. As far as being dependable we've put about 8,000 miles on it in about 10 months on a junkyard not rebuilt motor. Good Luck with your car which every way you go.
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Oct 26, 2006
#6
  • Oct 26, 2006
  • #6
I have a lead on the body parts locally here in the Louisville area so the decision will have to be made sooner than I thought.

I know this question has been asked over and over but I forgot the answer. I am planning a V8 T5 Trans on the 4 Cyl engine. so am I right on that the bell has to be 4cyl and the input shaft needs to be milled down but the V8 T5 will bolt right up to the bell>?
 

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Oct 26, 2006
#7
  • Oct 26, 2006
  • #7
Yes the 5.0 T-5 will bolt to the bell and the input shaft is too large for the 2.3.

Dan
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Oct 28, 2006
#8
  • Oct 28, 2006
  • #8
Sweet, it is so much easier to find a V8 T5 than a 4cyl one around here. I thought I had a lead on body parts for the car but it looks like that will be a something I need to work on or find another source.

I would like to dry the DOHC setup if I can get the correct informaion on how to do it. I have not found the proper information yet though.

So, it looks like I will begin to tear down the SVO engine this weekend and begin to re-build it. Once that is successfully put into the car I may look more into the DOHC setup for the second block I have.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Oct 29, 2006
#9
  • Oct 29, 2006
  • #9
HEY RICH.

I got your email and haven't had a chance to reply. I got 30mpg out of the green car in full street/race form. I haven't checked the mileage on the Project Bolt-On but its probably in the ball bark of the green car. As for reliability? My engine has over 320k miles and 100 sprays of 100shot or more.

As for an engine choice.
You know by the difficulty of the swap its probably a slight bit easier to do a turbo 2.3. I did dog the absolute hell out of the green car every single day and I drove it about 40k miles after the swap. I've dealt with some electrical problems that I never ran into with the 351w.

You know what I'm leaning towards but I would let it come down to whatever you have around or can get.

Here's stingers page for my car: http://www.stinger-performance.com/bolton.html
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Nov 1, 2006
#10
  • Nov 1, 2006
  • #10
I checked out the page. I am looking to get the SVO up in there in Stock Trim and Intercooled. Once I get it running I will make the decisions needed to make engancements. I want to begin with a serpentine set up and a 3g alt though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
91
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
299
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
K
86 GT Water Pump
  • Kade5114
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
101
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
nickyb
R
For Sale 2008 Mustang Bullitt for sale Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 0S3
  • ROHDRNNR
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
150
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 10, 2026
ROHDRNNR
R
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?