• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Deep Dish bullitts on a 65...how??

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaliKev
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2008
C

CaliKev

New Member
Oct 28, 2005
3
0
0
May 5, 2008
#1
  • May 5, 2008
  • #1
I came across this car on ebay and fell in love with the wheels. I've always like the deep dish in the rear, but thought there just wasn't enough room on the 65.

Take a look:

http://www.specialtysales.com/1965-ford-mustang-2+2-c-1397.htm



How would I be able to do this on my 65?



Thanks!
Kevin
 

golf4283

Active Member
May 30, 2003
1,253
1
39
Orland Park, Illinois
May 5, 2008
#2
  • May 5, 2008
  • #2
Just order a set of Bulllitts with wicked backspacing. Thats all you really have to do. I don't think you would need to narrow the rear end or anything. The reason they're so deep is because they're probably wide tires and the person didn't want to use a spacer or wheel adapter.
 

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
May 5, 2008
#3
  • May 5, 2008
  • #3
I have 17" X 8" rims on the back of my 65 with 4½" backspacing. They have a deep lip. I did have to trim the rear fender lip though.
 
E

eleanor_350

Member
May 20, 2003
92
0
6
Kentucky
May 6, 2008
#4
  • May 6, 2008
  • #4
deltascrew said:
I have 17" X 8" rims on the back of my 65 with 4½" backspacing. They have a deep lip. I did have to trim the rear fender lip though.
Click to expand...

Deltascrew,

Just out of curiousity, was it your rim width and backspacing that required you to trim the fender lip or was it your tire size? What size tires are you running on the rear?

The car in that ebay add looked like it was running a pretty narrow tire compared to the width of the wheel. Look at how "ballooned" out the side wall looks.
 

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
May 6, 2008
#5
  • May 6, 2008
  • #5
eleanor_350 said:
Deltascrew,

Just out of curiousity, was it your rim width and backspacing that required you to trim the fender lip or was it your tire size? What size tires are you running on the rear?
Click to expand...

I am running 245/45/17 only the tire rubs, not the rim. a 4.75 B/S rim would fit better , but Coy's only offers a 4½ b/s. even after trimming the fender lip mine still occasionally rubs, so I added air-shocks to keep it from bottoming out.

if you went with 225/45/17 you would probably not have a problem
 

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
May 6, 2008
#6
  • May 6, 2008
  • #6
This looks like the wheel on the fastback

View attachment 318707

it is a 17" x 10.5 wheel with 6.85 b/s


at 10½" wide thats why the tire looks stretched. from the pic it looks llike the tire is a 255.

its definitely a TIGHT fit. I would imagine that it rubs
 
C

Cobra ssc

Member
May 31, 2006
80
0
7
Austin, TX
May 6, 2008
#7
  • May 6, 2008
  • #7
Deltascrew - can you post some pics of the rear wheels fitment?
 

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
May 7, 2008
#8
  • May 7, 2008
  • #8
Cobra ssc said:
Deltascrew - can you post some pics of the rear wheels fitment?
Click to expand...

I'll try to snap you a couple pics tonight
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
May 7, 2008
#9
  • May 7, 2008
  • #9
if you want wheels with a larger dish you're going to need a smaller rear axle. I am ordering a custom axle from tcp with the new rear suspension and I have the choice of how wide I want the axle to be, i'm basing my decision on what kind of dish in the rear wheels I want to get. I'm still unsure of what I like so its still up in the air
 

deltascrew

Member
Oct 11, 2007
27
2
6
Mississippi
May 7, 2008
#10
  • May 7, 2008
  • #10
Cobra ssc said:
Deltascrew - can you post some pics of the rear wheels fitment?
Click to expand...

these pics aren't that great, but here you go

these are Coys C-5 Chrome 17" X 8" 4½" B/S
with Nexen 245/45/17 tires.

<a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/mustangbrantley/1965Fastback/photo#5197810301072474306"><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/mustangbrantley/SCJU7f1KgMI/AAAAAAAABRI/TCP_yOVrvYw/s800/IMG_4491.JPG" /></a>



<a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/mustangbrantley/1965Fastback/photo#5197810399856722130"><img src="http://lh5.ggpht.com/mustangbrantley/SCJVBP1KgNI/AAAAAAAABRU/pOBMv5WJ_e0/s800/IMG_4493.JPG" /></a>
 
C

Cobra ssc

Member
May 31, 2006
80
0
7
Austin, TX
May 8, 2008
#11
  • May 8, 2008
  • #11
Thanks for the pics..

How hard would it be to fit a 315 tire on a 10.5 wide rim on a 65'66 Mustang_
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
May 8, 2008
#12
  • May 8, 2008
  • #12
Cobra ssc said:
Thanks for the pics..

How hard would it be to fit a 315 tire on a 10.5 wide rim on a 65'66 Mustang_
Click to expand...

Extremely hard since the stock wheel wells only have 11 or so inches in width
 
C

Cobra ssc

Member
May 31, 2006
80
0
7
Austin, TX
May 8, 2008
#13
  • May 8, 2008
  • #13
dodgestang said:
Extremely hard since the stock wheel wells only have 11 or so inches in width
Click to expand...

So that would leave .25" space on each side of the wheel...no problem. I guess a mini-tub would be in order.

I have heard that even with a mini-tub, the the inside panels and rear seat will not fit anymore. Has anyone done this a so are there any and if so are there any pics of the process?
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
May 8, 2008
#14
  • May 8, 2008
  • #14
Cobra ssc said:
So that would leave .25" space on each side of the wheel...no problem. I guess a mini-tub would be in order.

I have heard that even with a mini-tub, the the inside panels and rear seat will not fit anymore. Has anyone done this a so are there any and if so are there any pics of the process?
Click to expand...

Your math has forgotten to take into account the section width of the tire mounted on the rim which is 12.5-13 inches. Which means your frame rails would need to move a MIN of something like 2.5-3 inches to get it all under the sheetmetal of the car....which is a little more involved than a mini tub.
 
C

Cobra ssc

Member
May 31, 2006
80
0
7
Austin, TX
May 8, 2008
#15
  • May 8, 2008
  • #15
dodgestang said:
Your math has forgotten to take into account the section width of the tire mounted on the rim which is 12.5-13 inches. Which means your frame rails would need to move a MIN of something like 2.5-3 inches to get it all under the sheetmetal of the car....which is a little more involved than a mini tub.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that it would be more of a back-half car then...

I'll need to figure out something to get more rubber on the road.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
May 9, 2008
#16
  • May 9, 2008
  • #16
how much power are you planning?

I have a 410 stroker and at the track the 275 drag radials provide plenty of traction with no spin.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 9, 2008
#17
  • May 9, 2008
  • #17
While it's not a 65-66 Stang, it's close, here's a link to pics of my 77 Comet with 295/50/15's on Wheel Vintiques 15x10 series 35's. These wheels have a 5 inch backspace and all I had to do was roll the fender lips to clear. http://s125.photobucket.com/albums/p53/baddad457/
 
C

CaliKev

New Member
Oct 28, 2005
3
0
0
May 9, 2008
#18
  • May 9, 2008
  • #18
So I went down to Specialty to see the car yesterday and the rear's are actually 18's and the front are 17's. The rear tires are really streched on the wheels (as you can see by the pictures). The rear tires were 255/35/18 (fronts were 235/40/17) and I could see where the guy cut notches in 2 places on each leaf spring in order for the tires to fit. Also looked like he made some extra room in the wheel well.
 
C

Cobra ssc

Member
May 31, 2006
80
0
7
Austin, TX
May 9, 2008
#19
  • May 9, 2008
  • #19
dodgestang said:
how much power are you planning?

I have a 410 stroker and at the track the 275 drag radials provide plenty of traction with no spin.
Click to expand...

I have a 347 with a vortech and methanol injection which is over 600 to the rear wheels. My 95 Cobra had less power with 315 drag radials and more suspension work and still wouldn't hook up until 3rd gear, depending road conditions. The 65 is lighter with less rubber on the ground. I guess I could run some 15" wheels with stickier compound tires.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
721
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
706
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
My Stupid Rearview Mirror (with solution)
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Sep 26, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 5, 2023
ChillPhatCat
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?