Ok,
Let me give you some history. About 2 years or so ago, I replaced my Stock intake track with a Desecharger CAI (DS) and the stock MAF with a Pro-M 80mm Unit (PM80). This set-up yeild some decent gains (you could see some dyno charts on my website) and I was happy. Recently I decided to replace the DS and PM80 with a WMS Ceramic Coated Velocity CAI (WMS) & a 95mm Pro-M MAF (PM95). Also, it's to note that access to a dyno over here in Germany is very limited and due to the season they are closed. So, to help me with my quest for HP/TQ and to aid in testing I purchased a Mr. Dyno MRD)(www.mrdyno.com) & an Autotap (www.autotap.com) with all the software parameters for the Ford vehicles. I'm also working in aquiring an WB AF Data Logger and Meter.
The MRD is very in-deph little system. You must enter all types of parrameter in order to (IOT) be fully accurate. I have to say, that there are about 50 diferent imputs to the system.
Since I don't have all the time in the world I just used the system "as is" from the box and only entered the name of my vehicle and the weight. That was it. No weather, altitude, vehicle losses at RPM, vehicle losses vs. gear ratio, "Gs" at acceleration, etc....Again, just as is from the box. These readings will not be in any way accurate and using that term means "reflecting the ACTUAL HP/TQ vs. a BASELINE HP/TQ".
I explain: with the as is setting on the MRD the car produces (as example) 175HP/180TQ, that will provide me with a base line and I can use to reflect gains or losses when I do changes to my vehicle. I hope that explain it.
Any how, I have conducted about 19 runs with the MRD and IS VERY Repetitive and Accurate.
Ok, enough of talking and here are the runs.
This graph represent the following set-up:
DS & PM80 (COLOR BROWN), NO JMS Chip (is out getting re-burned right now to correct a RICH condition)
WMS & PM95 (COLOR RED), NO JMS Chip
Please notice that the RMP readings are off by around 300 RPMS (when you see the TQ/HP readings and they meet they are off by that number) LESS than actual.
Don't worry about the HP/TQ readings since they do not reflect actual numbers and I use them just as a base line.
Keep your attention on the graph.
This Graph here is represent the following:
DS, PM80 & JMS CHIP (Before I send out) (Dark Brown) (Top Graph)
WMS, PM95 & NO CHIP (RED) (Middle Graph)
DS, P80 & NO CHIP (Brown) (Lower Graph)
Notice the similar graphs, take a look on how the HP redings dips in the top end WITHOUT the CHIP, this is due to the stock computer making the car RICH from 6000RPMS-on.
The WMS & PM95 loss about 5 HP at the lower end but gaining over 18 HP at the top end when compared to the DS & PM80. When compared to the DS & PM80 and JMS Chip combo is down in power at the top end by about 10 HP at 6100RPMS and at o/a 6700RPMS by 20+ HP.
I figure once I get my JMS Chip back I should be able to surpass the DS, PM80 & Chip combo easly.
The test were all conducted in the same 3 mile long road, SUPER FLAT, and in really good condition (we are talking German quality roads here my friend!). I live out from the city about 30 minutes from Darmstatd and 15 minutes from Mainheim in a rural area, no traffic and just wide open.
Coments.
Naz
Let me give you some history. About 2 years or so ago, I replaced my Stock intake track with a Desecharger CAI (DS) and the stock MAF with a Pro-M 80mm Unit (PM80). This set-up yeild some decent gains (you could see some dyno charts on my website) and I was happy. Recently I decided to replace the DS and PM80 with a WMS Ceramic Coated Velocity CAI (WMS) & a 95mm Pro-M MAF (PM95). Also, it's to note that access to a dyno over here in Germany is very limited and due to the season they are closed. So, to help me with my quest for HP/TQ and to aid in testing I purchased a Mr. Dyno MRD)(www.mrdyno.com) & an Autotap (www.autotap.com) with all the software parameters for the Ford vehicles. I'm also working in aquiring an WB AF Data Logger and Meter.
The MRD is very in-deph little system. You must enter all types of parrameter in order to (IOT) be fully accurate. I have to say, that there are about 50 diferent imputs to the system.
Since I don't have all the time in the world I just used the system "as is" from the box and only entered the name of my vehicle and the weight. That was it. No weather, altitude, vehicle losses at RPM, vehicle losses vs. gear ratio, "Gs" at acceleration, etc....Again, just as is from the box. These readings will not be in any way accurate and using that term means "reflecting the ACTUAL HP/TQ vs. a BASELINE HP/TQ".
I explain: with the as is setting on the MRD the car produces (as example) 175HP/180TQ, that will provide me with a base line and I can use to reflect gains or losses when I do changes to my vehicle. I hope that explain it.
Any how, I have conducted about 19 runs with the MRD and IS VERY Repetitive and Accurate.
Ok, enough of talking and here are the runs.
This graph represent the following set-up:
DS & PM80 (COLOR BROWN), NO JMS Chip (is out getting re-burned right now to correct a RICH condition)
WMS & PM95 (COLOR RED), NO JMS Chip
Please notice that the RMP readings are off by around 300 RPMS (when you see the TQ/HP readings and they meet they are off by that number) LESS than actual.
Don't worry about the HP/TQ readings since they do not reflect actual numbers and I use them just as a base line.
Keep your attention on the graph.
This Graph here is represent the following:
DS, PM80 & JMS CHIP (Before I send out) (Dark Brown) (Top Graph)
WMS, PM95 & NO CHIP (RED) (Middle Graph)
DS, P80 & NO CHIP (Brown) (Lower Graph)
Notice the similar graphs, take a look on how the HP redings dips in the top end WITHOUT the CHIP, this is due to the stock computer making the car RICH from 6000RPMS-on.
The WMS & PM95 loss about 5 HP at the lower end but gaining over 18 HP at the top end when compared to the DS & PM80. When compared to the DS & PM80 and JMS Chip combo is down in power at the top end by about 10 HP at 6100RPMS and at o/a 6700RPMS by 20+ HP.
I figure once I get my JMS Chip back I should be able to surpass the DS, PM80 & Chip combo easly.
The test were all conducted in the same 3 mile long road, SUPER FLAT, and in really good condition (we are talking German quality roads here my friend!). I live out from the city about 30 minutes from Darmstatd and 15 minutes from Mainheim in a rural area, no traffic and just wide open.
Coments.
Naz
