• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Discuss Lower Control Arms here

  • Thread starter Thread starter CobraRed_96_GT
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#1
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #1
I need lower control arms for some future traction planting and it seems everywhere i turn there are problems with sets. most of the ebay ones are even fake to the name they advertise. I guess im stuck with MM, which i suppose isn't a bad thing.
So is it XD or HD series i should get? Opinions on others and how they work compared to a hemmed/spherical joint and opposing urethane bushing are welcome.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 18, 2007
#2
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #2
I was having the same issue about the ebay ones. Winters told me that the ones on there might be fake Don't want to take a chance at that. I was also looking into MM and steeda, but the price was a little too much for me I need adjustable ones because my car is lowered. What do you think about the UPR Pro-Series ones?
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Dec 18, 2007
#3
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #3
chris,

thanks for the pm about the control arms. Here is a couple threads for some info
http://forums.modulardepot.com/suspension-wheels-tires/106549-best-upper-lower-control-arms.html
http://forums.modulardepot.com/susp...drag-racers-whats-good-upper-control-arm.html

lots of good reviews on the pro series stuff. The quality seems to be much better than the non adjustables.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 18, 2007
#4
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #4
Winters98GT said:
chris,

thanks for the pm about the control arms. Here is a couple threads for some info
http://forums.modulardepot.com/suspension-wheels-tires/106549-best-upper-lower-control-arms.html
http://forums.modulardepot.com/susp...drag-racers-whats-good-upper-control-arm.html

lots of good reviews on the pro series stuff. The quality seems to be much better than the non adjustables.
Click to expand...

Cool, thanks for sharing.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#5
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #5
yeah i hear mostly good things about the adjustable UPR UCA's, just the solid UCA's by them haven't turned out well:
tomustang said:
Ah, you gotta make me search for it!



I could care less if he had 300hp or 600hp Why buy someting this cheap for a limited rate by upr when they said it's only good for 300??

From upr's site:





Looks like the weld never mated with the tube, that's a chinese welding craft


Click to expand...

Why are you going UCA's anyway? That will take a lot away from your daily driving and isn't often needed
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#6
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #6
This is what i sent Winters, from MM:
In the stock four-link design, the rear upper control arms are trying to do two jobs at once. One is to control axle wind-up, the other is to locate the axle side to side. When pushed to the performance limit, the upper control arms don’t do either job very well.
When retaining the original four-link suspension, the best compromise between resistance to suspension bind, best control of axle position, best ride quality, and least potential damage to the chassis, is to retain rubber bushings in the rear upper control arms. This is especially important when adding a Panhard Bar. The compliance of a rubber-bushed upper control arm is required when a Panhard bar is added to the Mustang four-link suspension.
Most aftermarket rear control arms use hard 2-piece urethane bushings, Delrin bushings, or steel bushings. Those types of bushings do not allow the angularity needed for the Mustang’s suspension to articulate freely. The resulting suspension bind causes the rear tires to break loose very easily. Suspension bind not only causes poor handling and poor traction, but it also causes damage to the torque-boxes. As the attachment points on the chassis for the rear control arms, the torque-boxes can suffer greatly from the abuse of poorly designed control arm bushings. After all, the torque boxes are only made of folded sheet metal.
Click to expand...
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Dec 18, 2007
#7
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #7
I run the regular HD version, and installed them before the car was a year old. Zero problems with them, although they probably do transmit a good deal more NVH as opposed to the stockers. I don't do any drag racing, so I didn't find the need to run the XD's (they weren't available at the time anyway).

As per MM's site, the XD's are for cars that are drag raced, where the HD's are not:

"
The difference between the two is the bushing configuration. The Heavy-Duty arms are suitable for cars with moderate horsepower levels that are not drag raced. We recommend the Extreme-Duty control arms for any car that is drag raced, and any car with the higher horsepower levels that come with superchargers, larger displacement engines, etc.

The MM Extreme-Duty Rear Lower Control Arms should be used for any form of drag racing
. Repeated standing-start launches will eventually damage urethane bushings"

You can't go wrong with MM's items, and the choice you make will depend on your driving. If you're purely into drag racing and don't care about your handling in the turns, then a set of UPR may do you fine. Me personally, those wouldn't come within 10 feet of my car, but the decision is yours.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#8
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #8
yeah im going to proly put down 10-18 runs with them total. But im not putting our huge hp, just a good amount of rubber
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Dec 18, 2007
#9
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #9
not really a hp issue, more a matter of how hard you launch the car. Im proboly gonna have my shop recommend a setup for me.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Dec 18, 2007
#10
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #10
I am running MM lowers and very pleased with them.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#11
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #11
Winters98GT said:
not really a hp issue, more a matter of how hard you launch the car. Im proboly gonna have my shop recommend a setup for me.
Click to expand...

well im going to be launching pretty hard. I think not having FL SFC's is going to be a problem for me, but i cant fit them with the side exhaust
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 18, 2007
#12
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #12
I just saw the UPR adjustable pro-series upper and lower control arms in a package deal for $299. I thought that was a good deal. How bad does it affect drive-ability?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#13
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #13
for that price i'd just go MM lower XD and call it a day. What are you trying to achieve with UCA's?
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Dec 18, 2007
#14
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #14
this a good thread. Not the ordinary, same old exhuast, gear, pully thread. Lets gather as much info on this and keep it going.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Dec 18, 2007
#15
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #15
I havent had any issues with MM's parts except, I was unaware of the XD's when I bought my 1st set of LCA's a couple of years ago so I went with HD's & the poly bushing has blown out twice on the driver side....I replaced it the 1st time it happened & it blew out again after going to the track only one time, & with 295 street tires at that. I have a set of XD's going in soon....MM will tell u that the HD's arent for anything but street use too & its true, but even hard launching on street tires will blow them out....IMO, why even buy lca's if your not driving your car hard though?
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 18, 2007
#16
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #16
My car is lowered. So I think I need them for the right proper pinion angle don't I? or is it fine with just the LCA's?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#17
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #17
fobra559 said:
My car is lowered. So I think I need them for the right proper pinion angle don't I? or is it fine with just the LCA's?
Click to expand...

the MM LCA's end opposing the urethane bushing has a spherical end that flexes/rotates to some degree if i read it right. They should be fine, who doesn't have a lowered car that puts this kind of suspension in?

Plus i know where yo can get the XD's $309 shipped
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 18, 2007
#18
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #18
CobraRed_96_GT said:
the MM LCA's end opposing the urethane bushing has a spherical end that flexes/rotates to some degree if i read it right. They should be fine, who doesn't have a lowered car that puts this kind of suspension in?

Plus i know where yo can get the XD's $309 shipped
Click to expand...

Just wasn't sure, that's why I always ask you guys That sounds like a good deal, where from?
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Dec 18, 2007
#19
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #19
"The MM Extreme-Duty Rear Lower Control Arms should be used for any form of drag racing. Repeated standing-start launches will eventually damage urethane bushings"

I think that is funny. What do people do at the start of autocross races? Drag racing is hard on a car only at the start. Road racing/DE/autocrossing is hard on a car all the time. I'm not knocking MM parts, but
EPIKGT said:
"IMO, why even buy lca's if your not driving your car hard though?"
Click to expand...

Why sell parts for a street Mustang that can't take repeated hard standing starts? If it can't take what the stockers can take, why should I buy it? For the bushings?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Dec 18, 2007
#20
  • Dec 18, 2007
  • #20
fobra559 said:
Just wasn't sure, that's why I always ask you guys That sounds like a good deal, where from?
Click to expand...

pm'd, but i forgot you'll need the 99+ ones - which might be a diff price. You need the MMRLCA-31 ones
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
211
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
243
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
C
Suspension spherical or urethane upper control arm differential side bushings?
  • colehelm
  • Jul 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
manicmechanic007
Suspension Foxbody ride height change after installing new control arms
  • Mhalc1
  • Jan 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 10, 2024
Mhalc1
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?