• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Do current so called "cold air intakes" really give any power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter svtash
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
S

svtash

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
29
0
0
Vista, CA
Sep 29, 2005
#1
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #1
I knoiw there has been discussion on whether current air intakes are cold air or not but I was wondering if they actually give any power. Now I was just thinking of thos yesterday and I personally dont know the answer since I dont have my car quite yet but would like to know for when i do get it. Heres my question. Now most intakes need a retune of the computer to adjust for it. The power gains that are claimed on the websites of all the intake manufacturers seem to claim 20-25hp and ~20tq. I have also seen approx the same numbers on the sites for just the retune even with stock intake. SO does an intake actually give you a power gain or is it pretty much all in the tune? Has anyone done each one seperate or do just one or the other. I am curious to actually know how much an intake actually helps or if it all the tune.

One other newb question: Can an intake really help much w/o a larger throttle body? I would think it would just tend to "bottleneck" a bit w/o a bigger tb.
 

2003gt

Member
Apr 27, 2003
290
0
16
Brandon, MS
Sep 29, 2005
#2
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #2
oh hell ya they do....with a tune....


my local dynoshop, also good friends of mine, have his wife's gt (their test car) completely stock accept for the JLT cold air intake, and a tune by with the xct and they have the (to the ground numbers) at 298hp and I forgot TQ

so just about a 15hp gain !
 
D

dustindu4

New Member
Mar 24, 2004
19
0
1
Sep 29, 2005
#3
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #3
Yeah they make a huge difference, you know it as soon as you start the car. Do it and you wont regret it.


Huge difference with my K&N air charger with no tune.
 
W

willgator1

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
7
0
0
titusville,fla
Sep 29, 2005
#4
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #4
dustindu4 said:
Yeah they make a huge difference, you know it as soon as you start the car. Do it and you wont regret it.


Huge difference with my K&N air charger with no tune.
Click to expand...


bbkperformance has a cai with throttle body that really makes a diff check this months issue of fast fords
 
O

Owner1

Member
Apr 1, 2005
37
0
7
Carnation, WA
Sep 29, 2005
#5
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #5
In my opinion, virtually all the horsepower gain is in the tune. Like you, I have seen dyno results of cars with just a tune, and they show the same 15-20 horsepower that the folks with "CAI" get after a tune.

While it is possible that the factory left 5-10 easily obtained horsepower on the table, it seems unlikely, given the expense they went to in modifying the engine for the '05.

If the gain from the CAI is really less than 5 horsepower (as I believe to be extremely likely) than it is an increase that could never be felt, but could be measured at a dragstrip. As for the folks who can "feel" the increase of 5 or 10 horsepower, well, the placebo effect is a real phenomenon. A two or three percent change is not perceptible without instrumentation.

Having said all this, my '05 is completely stock. However, I did spend 19 years seriously modifying a fox body.

Owner1
 

Fourth Horseman

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
92
0
0
Sep 29, 2005
#6
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #6
What I've noticed on many engines with CAIs, RAIs, etc. installed isn't so much a horsepower increase, as measured by the seat-o-the pants, as an increase in how quickly the engine will turn up to high RPMs. The engine itself seems to accelerate faster if it breathes easier.
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Sep 29, 2005
#7
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #7
Yes, a tune will bring you larger numbers but the engine still isnt getting all the power that it can. A good example is the 03/04 cobra with the "no-tune-required" k&n short ram intake, please stop using Cold Air Intake cause it really doesnt do that for our cars, the intake is good for just about 20-30hp throughout the rpm.

For the '05 though the filter does make a difference because 30hp isnt just in the tune, more than half of that is the short ram doing its job. Of course this ~30bhp is when using the c&l and jlt kits with a good tune to match on an otherwise stock vehicle.

-Dan
 
R

RICVA05

New Member
Apr 21, 2005
66
0
0
Sep 29, 2005
#8
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #8
If you do not have the CAI and you are trying to figure out in your head if it is worth having one. See how many people are complaining about there CAI I think you will be hard pressed to find anybody unhappy.
 
S

svtash

New Member
Sep 30, 2004
29
0
0
Vista, CA
Sep 29, 2005
#9
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #9
I dont think anyone is unhappy cause im sure it gives at least a bit more power and might make it sound a bit different as well but I am just trying to figure weather it is worth an extra 300 or so bones for it, thats all. Im trying to figure out how much is from the tune and how much is from the intake. think i might buy the two together from jlt but not sure yet. Seems to be the best deal I can find.
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Sep 29, 2005
#10
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #10
svtash said:
I dont think anyone is unhappy cause im sure it gives at least a bit more power and might make it sound a bit different as well but I am just trying to figure weather it is worth an extra 300 or so bones for it, thats all. Im trying to figure out how much is from the tune and how much is from the intake. think i might buy the two together from jlt but not sure yet. Seems to be the best deal I can find.
Click to expand...

I don't like the looks of most of the CAI kits, so I will probably test your theory and maybe get a drop in K+N panel filter and an SCT tune. I like the factory appearance.
 

REDFIRE 05 GT

New Member
Nov 18, 2004
283
0
0
Junction City KS
Sep 29, 2005
#11
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #11
All I can say is the C&L is awsome in looks and performance
 

05canuck

Member
Apr 1, 2005
82
0
6
Sep 29, 2005
#12
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #12
I just installed the AFE kit in my car last night, I can say it alone is worth the 300 bucks. The sound is slight but noticable and its pulls hard too, the kit is very nice and had no problems and is more "cold air".

ps I have no tune.
 

05canuck

Member
Apr 1, 2005
82
0
6
Sep 29, 2005
#13
  • Sep 29, 2005
  • #13
I'll post some pics inside the box tomorrow
 

Motorhead6T5

New Member
Oct 21, 2004
215
0
0
Marysville,CA
Sep 30, 2005
#14
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #14
I don't have one.Don't plan on buying one either.
 
1

1fastz

Member
Sep 30, 2005
124
0
16
Sep 30, 2005
#15
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #15
if you had one you would probly be closer to 108-109 mph in the traps
 

Motorhead6T5

New Member
Oct 21, 2004
215
0
0
Marysville,CA
Sep 30, 2005
#16
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #16
1fastz said:
if you had one you would probly be closer to 108-109 mph in the traps
Click to expand...
Naw don't think so. I don't think I would be any faster with a CAI. Things that would make me faster is a o/r pipe,and or gears. Track numbers don't lie
 
G

gotan05

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
11
0
0
Sep 30, 2005
#17
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #17
Motorhead you do any dyno pulls? Not disagreeing with your statement just want to see your hp without the CAI. If i can spend $200-250 on something better I will.
 
1

1fastz

Member
Sep 30, 2005
124
0
16
Sep 30, 2005
#18
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #18
I will prove it one way or the other in a couple hours

I will have PROOF one way or the other in about to hours ..

my c and L cold air kit just arived via ups and i will be puting it on my car and dynoing it before and after.

NO OTHER CHANGES except the car already has a magnaflow cat back.

I am going to dyno the car before and after c and l with NO tune then I will put the tune in it and dyno it again ..

this will be undeniable proof if they are worth a gain or not.
 
1

1fastz

Member
Sep 30, 2005
124
0
16
Sep 30, 2005
#19
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #19
ok results

Well there is NO denying they get more air into the motor..

my car went from 11.8 to 14.2-1 air fuel with no change other then the cold air.

adding JUST the cold air wihtout any tuneing COST ME horsepower

however usegn my tuner to tune it to the SAME air fuel i had previously even with NO timeing adjustments i gained 11 horsepower at the wheels.

then i went in and adjusted the timeing tables and the total gain was 19 horsepower at the rear wheel average..

and peak gains of 34 horsepower at the higher rpms where the factory tune is just way off and the horsepower was droping badly with the stock tune.

@With the programer the power curve stays flat and doenst drop all the way out to 6600 rpm.. I reset the limiter to 6800.


air fuel was 12.9 straight across at the best power level of 293 horsepower and 308 torque..

no mods other then the cat back magnaflow and the c and l cold air intake and the quick tune i put in it ..

im sure there are a few maybee 4 5 more horses in the tune as i didnt do to much fine tuneing just got the air fuel in the corect area and added or subtracted timeign 2 degrees at at time globaly.


conclusion without a doubt the cold air intakes are worth some power .. however you MUST use a tuner with them.

I removed the cold air and made pulls with the stock box again retuning for the setup and i lost 9 rwhp across the rpms vs tune plus cold air and as much as 15 rwhp up top past power peak.
 

krang00

Founding Member
Oct 29, 2002
79
1
0
Allentown, PA
Sep 30, 2005
#20
  • Sep 30, 2005
  • #20
What are you guys using to do your tuning? I don't know that much about it but am pretty interestered in it with the new stangs. I'm assuming things are much more flexible than with my old fox?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
968
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?