• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

do I need bigger injectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 111010
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2010
1

111010

New Member
Jun 30, 2010
4
0
2
Sep 29, 2010
#1
  • Sep 29, 2010
  • #1
Im putting together a budget 302 and i have a edelbrock performer intake, and a 75mm throtle body and a set of tfs 170 heads and tfs stage 1 cam and long tube headers and 4:10 gears with a 5spd. will the stock 19 lb injectors be ok with this set up? Or do i need to go bigger?
 

fivemustangs

Member
Dec 22, 2007
222
0
17
Bar Harbor, Maine
Sep 29, 2010
#2
  • Sep 29, 2010
  • #2
I would upgrade to 24lb or 30lb injectors to stay on the safe side, depending on future mods maybe even 42lb if your looking into forced induction or nitrous. you could run a kenne bell boost-a-pump with the mods you have, but I think with your set up the 19lb'rs would be right on the edge. remeber you gotta get a different mass air to match your set up to.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 29, 2010
#3
  • Sep 29, 2010
  • #3
I would def bump up, but I would go with 30s like said above and have the car dyno tuned instead of using an ots maf.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,071
1,655
194
NJ
Sep 29, 2010
#4
  • Sep 29, 2010
  • #4
Not sure what these guys are seeing in your setup.
But 24's are the right injector for you.
You don't size injectors for the future, you size them for what you have right now.
And the dyno tune with a chip instead of just using the right meter is an incredible waste of money in this case.

Fivemustangs, you do understand he has a pushrod setup with a return style fuel system right? A KB boost a pump????
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Sep 30, 2010
#5
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #5
Injector HP ratings:
Divide flow rating by .5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
385 HP x .85 = 326 HP
480 HP x .85 = 408 HP

Remember that the above ratings are at 39 PSI. Increasing the pressure will effectively increase the flow rating. Example: a 19 lb injector will flow 24 lbs at 63 PSI, and a 24 lb injector will flow 30 lbs at 63 PSI.

See Automotive Performance Software / Interactive JavaScripts Calculators to get the calculators used in these examples.

Here's the duty cycle explanation. Duty cycle is how much of the time the intake is open the injectors are turned on. The 85% figure means that for 85% of the time the intake valve is open, the injectors are spraying. The idea is that you want some percentage of the duty cycle left over so that you have some room to grow the process.

If you are at 100% and you need more fuel, all you can do is turn up the fuel pressure. That means the whole fuel curve from idle to WOT is affected. Maybe you are already too rich at idle, and turning up the fuel pressure makes it worse. If you had some injector duty cycle left to play with, a custom tune could use that where it is needed. That would not over richen the whole range from idle to WOT.


Diagram courtesy of Tmoss & Stang&2birds



Other fuel system components you'll need with bigger injectors
Remember that if your increase injector size, you need to increase fuel pump size too. If you don't the larger injectors will run out of fuel pressure. The minimum recommended fuel pump size would be a 155 LPH unit which is good for 440 naturally aspirated HP. You can go larger if you want to, the excess is returned to the tank.

If you choose larger injectors, you will need a matching calibrated MAF or a custom tune. I recommend PMAS MAFs. See HOME - they are rebuilding their website as of 30-Sep-2010, so you may not find all the information you would like to have.

I would also recommend that you plan on installing a adjustable fuel pressure regulator with the new pump. It will help you tune the system. I recommend Kirban fuel pressure regulators. See Kirban Performance




See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-95 wiring Mustang FAQ - Wiring & Engine Info Everyone should bookmark this site.

Ignition switch wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

Fuel, alternator, A/C and ignition wiring
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

Complete computer, actuator & sensor wiring diagram for 88-91 Mass Air Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91_5.0_EEC_Wiring_Diagram.gif

Vacuum diagram 89-93 Mustangs
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/mustangFoxFordVacuumDiagram.jpg

HVAC vacuum diagram
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/Mustang_AC_heat_vacuum_controls.gif

TFI module differences & pin out
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/TFI_5.0_comparison.gif

Fuse box layout
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/MustangFuseBox.gif
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 30, 2010
#6
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #6
Yeah, 24# is perfect for that set-up and will give you room to grow as well. Many guys over inject the car, I know I have learned a lot over the last few years and use a smaller injector then I would have in the past.....so much easier on tuning and drivabilty.
 

fivemustangs

Member
Dec 22, 2007
222
0
17
Bar Harbor, Maine
Sep 30, 2010
#7
  • Sep 30, 2010
  • #7
Like I said 24 or 30lb injectors, I just mentioned the 42's becuase I went with the 30's on my 95 and then decided the upgrade to a turbo the next year and wished I put the 42's on to begin with. But the 24lb will work very good. I thought boost-a-pumps work with both return and non-return fuel systems? but bigger fuel pump is always a good idea to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
N/A build on fresh stock 302
  • djcarrot
  • Oct 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
408
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
215
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?