• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Drivetrain Loss: Understanding it, and Improving it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MyEarsHurt
  • Start date Start date Oct 2, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 2, 2004
#1
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #1
I understand the basic concept of drivetrain loss, power transferred over a certain distance means you have less power at the wheels, fine. Now I have a few questions that I have never really seen clear answers to.

1. I have heard that the "average" drivetrain loss is something like 18-20%, any truth to that with my stang, or any other stang for that reason?

2. What can you do to decrease that percentage? Will buying a lightweight flyywheel, gearset, driveshaft, etc decrease that percentage at all? If so, how much?

Last question that I can think of right now on this topic, assume an 18% drivetrain loss on my car. Lets say that I dyno at 200 rwhp (just to keep the numbers simple). If I go out and buy a lightweight gear set, aluminum driveshaft all that stuff, and then go back to the dyno, are my numbers going to change? Or am I still gonna see 200 rwhp? Do these lightweight parts reflect performance on the street only, not the dyno, or both?

Thanks in advance for the input, I just wanted to clear this up cause I have been scratching my head over it recently...
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 2, 2004
#2
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #2
come on now, someone has to know this....
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Oct 2, 2004
#3
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #3
Yes, you should see a slight increase. Other components would help also like lighter wheels and brakes. Also reducing friction with sythetic oils in the tranny and rear end.
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 2, 2004
#4
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #4
jstreet0204 said:
Yes, you should see a slight increase. Other components would help also like lighter wheels and brakes. Also reducing friction with sythetic oils in the tranny and rear end.
Click to expand...


So If I go get dynoed prior to those mods, and then go do those mods, then my rwhp will actually improve? If so, im placing the order for my aluminum driveshaft tonight...
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Oct 2, 2004
#5
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #5
MyEarsHurt said:
So If I go get dynoed prior to those mods, and then go do those mods, then my rwhp will actually improve? If so, im placing the order for my aluminum driveshaft tonight...
Click to expand...
I wouldn't expect too much from just the ds, but little things add up.
 

NiteRydaGT

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
295
0
0
Long Island, NY
Oct 2, 2004
#6
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #6
Average drivetrain loss for a auto is 18%ish, for a stick its 15%ish. I am going to disagree with seeing a increase of HP on a dyno. The items listed...aluminum driveshaft, gears, and lightweight flywheel aren't really HP gaining parts. They will help you transfer the power to the wheels quicker and more efficiently. A torque converter will also help eliminate some parasitic HP loss.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Oct 2, 2004
#7
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #7
SR 97 GT said:
Average drivetrain loss for a auto is 18%ish, for a stick its 15%ish. I am going to disagree with seeing a increase of HP on a dyno. The items listed...aluminum driveshaft, gears, and lightweight flywheel aren't really HP gaining parts. They will help you transfer the power to the wheels quicker and more efficiently. A torque converter will also help eliminate some parasitic HP loss.
Click to expand...
Isn't 'more efficiently' = less drivetrain loss = more HP?

Though like you said, a d/s and flywheel probably won't show up on a dyno really. Dyno's also have a -%/+% varaiation from run to run

Going from 16" rims to 17" rims (66lbs more overall) was DEFINATELY noticable when I floored it. Rotating mass sucks.
 

NiteRydaGT

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
295
0
0
Long Island, NY
Oct 2, 2004
#8
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #8
JonJon said:
Isn't 'more efficiently' = less drivetrain loss = more HP?
Click to expand...
Yeah but I have never seen a driveshaft or gears add HP on a dyno. I've always understood it to be a SOTP increase.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Oct 2, 2004
#9
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #9
You should see about 2HP from the driveshaft, and I believe a little more than that from the flywheel....the best thing to do is to go buy some 15s for the rear...takes away the high speed rating but man does it make a difference.I am thinking of waiting until the S/C goes on before I buy the 10.5 bullitts for the rear, probably would hurt you...oh yea and dont get bigger round breaks, robs power.Really I dont think those mods are really worth the money, JUST for the RWHP...however the aluminum flywheel should be a good buy, the engine will rev much easier, but your take off MAY suffer a tad, while once you get going it will pull through the RPMs faster.
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 2, 2004
#10
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #10
SR 97 GT said:
Yeah but I have never seen a driveshaft or gears add HP on a dyno. I've always understood it to be a SOTP increase.
Click to expand...


See thats what I thought, but at the same time that doesnt make sense...cause if you decrease your drivetrain loss from 18% to 16% then you "should" see at least a few hp....i dont know though, this whole thing is a little confusing to me...


Follow up question, if I ditch my 18's for 16's would I dyno any higher than before, or would I just see a difference on the street.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Oct 2, 2004
#11
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #11
MyEarsHurt said:
See thats what I thought, but at the same time that doesnt make sense...cause if you decrease your drivetrain loss from 18% to 16% then you "should" see at least a few hp....i dont know though, this whole thing is a little confusing to me...


Follow up question, if I ditch my 18's for 16's would I dyno any higher than before, or would I just see a difference on the street.
Click to expand...

you should, but also remember dynos, are not 100% acurate. Throw on some 15 inch welds and I'll bet you'll see a difference
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 2, 2004
#12
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #12
yeah I dont know, my 18's are HEAVY! I am thinking about going back to the stock 16's and maybe put on a set of nitto drags, cheap mod, and it would probably help me a lot.
 
H

HIGDON

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
241
0
0
Ft. Hood, TX
Oct 3, 2004
#13
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #13
You won't gain HP, you will just be able to see what you had been losing to parasitic loss. Say the car is a 250 FWHP car and it puts 225 to the wheels. Adding the lighter stuff may allow you to see 230 to the wheels but it's still a 250 FWHP car.
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 3, 2004
#14
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #14
bump, any other opinions?
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
Oxnard, CA
Oct 3, 2004
#15
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #15
Reducing your cars overall weight will help too. Rear seat delete. Carbon Fiber hood and decklid(yeah I know). Removing spare tire. This won't increase HP but it should help anyway. You can try a underdrive pullies too.
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 3, 2004
#16
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #16
CaliLifeStyle said:
Reducing your cars overall weight will help too. Rear seat delete. Carbon Fiber hood and decklid(yeah I know). Removing spare tire. This won't increase HP but it should help anyway. You can try a underdrive pullies too.
Click to expand...


Rear seat delete = done
spare tire removal =done
CF hood =ordering next month
UD Pullies = done

Granted the 50+ pounds in stereo equipment doesnt help, but come on ya gotta have some nice beats to roll to
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Oct 3, 2004
#17
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #17
MyEarsHurt said:
Granted the 50+ pounds in stereo equipment doesnt help, but come on ya gotta have some nice beats to roll to
Click to expand...

Well, if you lose all that stereo equipment, you could change your name to MyAssHurts
 

MyEarsHurt

New Member
May 21, 2004
918
0
0
Oct 3, 2004
#18
  • Oct 3, 2004
  • #18
crew_dawg16 said:
Well, if you lose all that stereo equipment, you could change your name to MyAssHurts
Click to expand...


Yeah I could, but where is the fun in that?
 

Redfire03GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
395
0
0
Newark, CA.
Oct 4, 2004
#19
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #19
MyEarsHurt said:
Yeah I could, but where is the fun in that?
Click to expand...

Priorities I suppose.

Although, the weight reduction is nice but, less drivetrain powerloss won't -add- power but it will help to -free- up power. There's a slight but significant difference between the 2.

You should, in theory, see more rwhp by simply having less rotating mass and light weight drivetrain parts. That doesn't mean you all of a sudden added power that wasn't there to begin with, you're just better utilizing your exsisting power.

Also, weight reduction is sometimes in itself hurtful if not done properly. What I mean is, if you do a rear seat delete, remove spare tire, jack, etc. All of that weight is being removed from where? The back end. Is that going to help traction at all? No, it should actually be making traction worse. Sometimes weight redistribution/weight transfer is more effective than simple weight reduction.

Hope that helps.
 
C

CdnNavybob

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
105
0
0
Oct 4, 2004
#20
  • Oct 4, 2004
  • #20
I don't remeber which Mustang Magazine did it but they made a superlight 5.0 LX and actually added time at the strip due to the loss in traction. They found one guy could actually lift the rear wheels off the ground! They eventually had to add about 100 lbs of dead weight to the rear end to get the thing to hook properly.

Relocate your battery to the trunk, and consider some lightweight front suspension parts i.e. Tubular K-Member, tubular A-arms. I think a coil over front suspension will save a bit of weight too, in addition to improving you handling.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
847
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
809
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
Engine OG “Quickie Cooler” Fan/WP Drive
  • 90trunk
  • Apr 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
878
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2024
90trunk
H
is it possible to have a classic Mustang as a daily driver keeping in mind i have limited funds?
  • hnicholls_1989
  • Jun 8, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 18, 2024
70mstang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?