• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Drove a 2000 V6 Camaro today

  • Thread starter Thread starter atlblue2000
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
A

atlblue2000

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
1,245
0
36
TN
Jul 28, 2004
#1
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #1
I must say that it was kinda disappointing. And this isnt just b/c I drive a stang. I honestly thought that the auto seemed to zap alot of the power from the engine, especially from a dig. It just didn't seem as responsive as the auto '01 V6 stang I test drove a while back and I'm fairly confident that my 00 stick would be able to pull it, especially off the line. Are their autos notorious for being noticably slower than ours?? I've had the Vortech on for about 8 months now, so maybe that's just spoiled me.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jul 28, 2004
#2
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #2
i don't know but i drove a 97 5 speed firebird with a flowmaster and a ramair and it would definately kill a stock 2000 auto, maybe even a stick.
 

ChrisYellowV6

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
362
0
0
Pensacola, FL
Jul 28, 2004
#3
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #3
well off the line our cars will beat just about any v6 camaro, due to the fact we hit peak torque at ~2800 rpm's, their's are ~4500 rpm's.
 
A

atlblue2000

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
1,245
0
36
TN
Jul 28, 2004
#4
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #4
Well, in all fairness, it did seem to have alot more pep above 50. But, the interior sux big time. This one had T-Tops and my head was just about outside the top when I was driving (that woulda sucked in a rollover, huh. It also had alot more of a blind spot as compared to my mustang. But I'm sure that 10 other people would have 10 other reviews; that's just what I noticed in my short drive.
 

splatteredguts

i just hate it when i blow too much, cause then i
Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
1,314
0
36
Honolulu, HI
Jul 28, 2004
#5
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #5
i test drove one before i bought my stang and i felt like i was driving a boat. plus, the power felt identical if not slower than mustangs, and the dealer wanted about 1k more for it. fugg that.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jul 29, 2004
#6
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #6
do yall have a 99 and up stang, i know for sure the 94-98 would lose to a GM 3.8 5 spd. even the 3.1 5 spd. in the 92's. i have seen this happen.
 

Rizzox58

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
5
0
0
Orland park,IL
Jul 29, 2004
#7
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #7
what about a 98 stang v6 vs a camaro v6 off the line?
 
A

atlblue2000

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
1,245
0
36
TN
Jul 29, 2004
#8
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #8
dastang2 said:
do yall have a 99 and up stang,
Click to expand...
Thats what my sig tells me.


dastang2 said:
i know for sure the 94-98 would lose to a GM 3.8 5 spd. even the 3.1 5 spd. in the 92's. i have seen this happen.
Click to expand...
Well I'm sure it can happen and it may even happen quite often, but be careful about turning that observation into a blanket statement.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jul 29, 2004
#9
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #9
which tranny, auto or manual. if yours is auto and the other one is a standard than your toast
 

ChrisYellowV6

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
362
0
0
Pensacola, FL
Jul 29, 2004
#10
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #10
talk about driving a boat, lol. i test drove one back in 01 when i got my first stang, they wanted 22 for it, wouldnt even bargain on the price (because of the fact the 0% sale just started they knew some idiot would pay sticker for it), but yeah i drove an 01 camaro, standard...hated it...then drove an 01 mustang standard...bought it. lol. camaro's do have better high end hp and high end torque, but getting there is the problem, lol.
 
0

01White5spd

Founding Member
Nov 7, 2002
246
0
17
New Jersey
Jul 29, 2004
#11
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #11
atlblue2000 said:
It just didn't seem as responsive as the auto '01 V6 stang I test drove a while back and I'm fairly confident that my 00 stick would be able to pull it, especially off the line. Are their autos notorious for being noticably slower than ours??
Click to expand...

Im surprised that you thought that the Camaro Auto Tranny felt less responsive then an 01 Auto Stang. The GM Auto is a lot better than the mustang slush boxes. I had 2 Firebirds before my stang(an 89GTA and a 98 Firebird) and they both had much better shifting automatic trannys than the mustang AODE. I never took my 98 F-bird to the track but my brother went to the track with his 95 camaro(Auto) that only had exhaust upgrade and he ran 15.3-15.6 and it was his first time going to a drag strip in his life. So, either the 01 stang had a shift kit or the camaro you drove had something wrong with it.
 

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,
Apr 22, 2003
843
0
0
VA Beach
Jul 29, 2004
#12
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #12
my rental car 04 nissan maxima can pull a new gt
 
A

atlblue2000

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
1,245
0
36
TN
Jul 29, 2004
#13
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #13
dastang2 said:
which tranny, auto or manual. if yours is auto and the other one is a standard than your toast
Click to expand...

You're not one to read a post very well are you?? The camaro was an auto and I have a 5 spd.
 
A

atlblue2000

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
1,245
0
36
TN
Jul 29, 2004
#14
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #14
01White5spd said:
Im surprised that you thought that the Camaro Auto Tranny felt less responsive then an 01 Auto Stang. The GM Auto is a lot better than the mustang slush boxes. I had 2 Firebirds before my stang(an 89GTA and a 98 Firebird) and they both had much better shifting automatic trannys than the mustang AODE. I never took my 98 F-bird to the track but my brother went to the track with his 95 camaro(Auto) that only had exhaust upgrade and he ran 15.3-15.6 and it was his first time going to a drag strip in his life. So, either the 01 stang had a shift kit or the camaro you drove had something wrong with it.
Click to expand...

Well, maybe, maybe, maybe. The camaro could have had problems, the 01 auto stang I drove could have just been having a good day, who knows (I highly doubt the stang had a shift kit though b/c the salesmen said it was a trade in from an older lady). But, I will say this. I still feel like the 00 camaro auto was second to the stang's 4r70w, which is not as horrible of a tranny as some people think it is. Now if I were comparing it to ford's 94-95 V6 AODE, that pig just plain sucks. I have driven them all and I still like the newer ford auto better. It was more responsive when I mashed the pedal, it shifted a little smoother up top (although the camaro did well here, too), and it just seemed peppier all around.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jul 29, 2004
#15
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #15
atlblue2000 said:
You're not one to read a post very well are you?? The camaro was an auto and I have a 5 spd.
Click to expand...

no i read it right, i was just saying that the 5 speeds aren't very doggish, it sure goes faster than my 95 5 speed.
 

Rizzox58

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
5
0
0
Orland park,IL
Jul 29, 2004
#16
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #16
Okay. ill re pharse my question, an AUTO 98 mustang v6 vs a 92 or 98 v6 auto camaro? off the line?
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jul 29, 2004
#17
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #17
not sure about the auto camaros though never ridden in one and i have driven my sisters auto 98 and i hated it but that aint the point
 

Mean03V6

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
136
0
0
Houston, Texas
Jul 29, 2004
#18
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #18
dastang2 said:
which tranny, auto or manual. if yours is auto and the other one is a standard than your toast
Click to expand...

That's not necessarily the case...my brother had a 00 V6 stickshift Camaro and I beat him many times in my AOD. And before you ask, I'll just answer..yes, my brother knows how to drive a stick. As far as what I think about the Camaro...it's alot lower than my Stang. I dislike losing all the leg room on the passenger side of the car thanks to the big hump GM decided to put over there. The car is much longer and heavier and, I have to say, I really wasn't impressed with the power. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't all that great either. Also, as someone already mentioned, there is a significant lack of head room. My Stang isn't exactly comfy for someone my size (6'5"), but it's still better than the Camaro I think.
 

Mean03V6

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
136
0
0
Houston, Texas
Jul 29, 2004
#19
  • Jul 29, 2004
  • #19
97v6Silver said:
my rental car 04 nissan maxima can pull a new gt
Click to expand...

You know, I mentioned that once but all the 4.6 guys said I was full of crap....
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jul 30, 2004
#20
  • Jul 30, 2004
  • #20
Mean03V6 said:
That's not necessarily the case...my brother had a 00 V6 stickshift Camaro and I beat him many times in my AOD. And before you ask, I'll just answer..yes, my brother knows how to drive a stick. As far as what I think about the Camaro...it's alot lower than my Stang. I dislike losing all the leg room on the passenger side of the car thanks to the big hump GM decided to put over there. The car is much longer and heavier and, I have to say, I really wasn't impressed with the power. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't all that great either. Also, as someone already mentioned, there is a significant lack of head room. My Stang isn't exactly comfy for someone my size (6'5"), but it's still better than the Camaro I think.
Click to expand...

well then maybe my 95 5 spd. just sucks.(i know it does, everything is wrong) maybe the 97 firebird 5 spd felt a lot faster because my 95 has been so crappy for so long, who knows, i can drive too.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
K
2000 3.8 feels slower than my 2004 3.9
  • Kingll
  • Apr 19, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
875
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2019
Kingll
K
D
2000 V6 A/C Vent Controls INOP
  • Dlemmons
  • Jul 2, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
876
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 3, 2018
wmburns
Please help asap - Good deal or bad mojo?Prob w ps pump & brakes
  • Treena
  • Sep 9, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2019
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?