• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Dyno Jet vs. Mustang Dyno

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackenedSVT
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Apr 18, 2005
#21
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #21
Not sure if anyone answered this, but this is the MAIN thing when it comes to deciding which dyno to use. If you want to have your car tuned then the mustang dyno is definatly the one you want since it simulates the coorect load your ca would have when driving down the highway. If you want to just test your HP and compare it with others the a dynojet is W/O a doubt your best bet, as it loads EVERY car exactly the same and it allows a true comparison between 2 different cars. The mustang dynos results on say an 02SS vs an 04 GTO will be VERY different due to it loading the car to EACH cars own weight. Now 2 mustangs like 2GTs it would work pretty good for a comparo but a S/Cd GT vs a stock 03 cobra wouldnt due to a big weight difference. Hope that helps, and BTW when I dyno mine it will be on a dyno jet as its not going to get tuned.
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Apr 18, 2005
#22
  • Apr 18, 2005
  • #22
hotmustang331 said:
Not sure if anyone answered this, but this is the MAIN thing when it comes to deciding which dyno to use. If you want to have your car tuned then the mustang dyno is definatly the one you want since it simulates the coorect load your ca would have when driving down the highway. If you want to just test your HP and compare it with others the a dynojet is W/O a doubt your best bet, as it loads EVERY car exactly the same and it allows a true comparison between 2 different cars. The mustang dynos results on say an 02SS vs an 04 GTO will be VERY different due to it loading the car to EACH cars own weight. Now 2 mustangs like 2GTs it would work pretty good for a comparo but a S/Cd GT vs a stock 03 cobra wouldnt due to a big weight difference. Hope that helps, and BTW when I dyno mine it will be on a dyno jet as its not going to get tuned.
Click to expand...


Ok so let me get this right:

- Dyno jet = just check ur power and numbers ur car is putting down

- Mustang Dyno = used to tune your car.
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Apr 19, 2005
#23
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #23
UDTBadkarma said:
Ok so let me get this right:

- Dyno jet = just check ur power and numbers ur car is putting down

- Mustang Dyno = used to tune your car.
Click to expand...
yep.

Although having numbers from a dyno jet is pretty meaningless for how fast a car is. Because different cars will have different loads, so using a dyno that treats them the same is like getting a Strong Man competitor and a 5 year old kid to have a strength contest by lifting a football.

Both can pick it up so does that mean the kid is as strong as the Strong Man competitor?

As an example I know of a car that would only dyno 190-200rwhp on a dyno jet but in totally stock trim is capable of very low 11 ET's. The car only has a 1.8 n/a 4 cylinder engine with 230bhp crank, but it weighs less than 500kg (1100lbs) so carries a power to weight ratio of 500bhp/ton. To get a Mustang GT to have the same power to weight it would need in excess of 800bhp crank.


This car can out perform a Ferrari Enzo from 0-100mph-0
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Apr 19, 2005
#24
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #24
300bhp/ton said:
yep.

Although having numbers from a dyno jet is pretty meaningless for how fast a car is.
Click to expand...

True, but how many of us want to run 1/4-mile races on the dyno? I think the vast majority are simply interested in the power available at the wheels, especially before and after a mod, and will prove out how fast the car is at other venues like drag strips.

The drag strip does not offer the consistency of the dyno for proving the gains or losses offered by a modification, especially mods that return modest power increases. There are way too many variables at play to determine the true gains or losses in actualy power to the wheels. As well, the dyno can offer consistency for tuning at known loads and speeds that is also not really available at the strip.

Conversely, the dyno is no place to try to mimic a 1/4-mile dash because no matter how much you fudge the numbers and simulate this, that or the other, you'll never replicate the nuances of the real world.

Because different cars will have different loads, so using a dyno that treats them the same is like getting a Strong Man competitor and a 5 year old kid to have a strength contest by lifting a football.
Click to expand...

It depends on what you're after. For knowing the power at the wheels or tuning for lean-best-torque it doesn't really matter if an 800wHP Cobra is followed on the Dynojet or MD rollers by a 200wHP Lotus Seven. Each simply returns what it does...the reality - mass, weight distribution, tire size, aero, rolling resistance, power and all that plays out naturally at the track.



Love that car.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
591
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
285
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
568
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
914
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?