• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Dyno questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67coupe351w
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2004

67coupe351w

New Member
Jan 31, 2004
424
0
0
Portland, OR
Jun 22, 2004
#1
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #1
HI guys,

Ive never taken my car to a chassis dyno and I have a couple questions.

DO they specify a certian gear to be in when they take their readings?

Do they need to know what your rear end ratio is?

Do they need to know tire diameter?

I guess what im getting at is how it works exactly. If I understand it correctly the dyno is measuring torque at the ground and horsepower is back calculated through an equation something like hp = (RPM * torque) / 5252.

But what im wondering is you would get diffrent torque readings at the ground in the diffrent gears correct?

Can someone clear this up for me? Thanks!
 
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Jun 22, 2004
#2
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #2
67coupe351w said:
HI guys,

Ive never taken my car to a chassis dyno and I have a couple questions.

DO they specify a certian gear to be in when they take their readings?
Click to expand...

Usually in the gear that is closest to 1:1 (top in C4s and most toploaders, 4th in t5s etc)
67coupe351w said:
Do they need to know what your rear end ratio is?
Click to expand...

No
67coupe351w said:
Do they need to know tire diameter?
Click to expand...

No
67coupe351w said:
I guess what im getting at is how it works exactly. If I understand it correctly the dyno is measuring torque at the ground and horsepower is back calculated through an equation something like hp = (RPM * torque) / 5252.

But what im wondering is you would get diffrent torque readings at the ground in the diffrent gears correct?
Click to expand...

You dont really get torque but tractive effort. Yes gearing can affect this reading. Thats partly why they use the standard 1:1 drive gear as drivetrain losses can vary from gear to gear (eg your diff will lose more power at higher speeds than lower speeds due to more rotation, hence more internal friction)

This is also why dynos are best used as tuning tools (to show differences before and after making changes) rather than comparison tools as all these variables come into play between cars. The most important thing is how fast a car is between point A and B, not what number it puts out on the sheet.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jun 22, 2004
#3
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #3
My only comment is that lower gears actually lower dyno numbers, while highway gears post higher numbers.
Why? I am not sure of the exact reason, just that it works that way.
And yes, they will accellerate your car normally through the gears. When they get to your 1 to 1 gear, they will level the rpms out for a moment, then they floor it. That is the dyno run.
Good luck
Dave
 
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Jun 22, 2004
#4
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #4
Your observations match what I said. 4.11s result in alot more driveline friction to turn the wheels at the same speed compared to 2.73s, hence lower HP numbers on the same motor.
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jun 22, 2004
#5
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #5
I had my car on the dyno once and did my first pull in 4th gear, and then tried 3rd gear a few minutes later after a cool down to see the difference. I got the exact same numbers.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jun 22, 2004
#6
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #6
Every dyno I have ever had a vehicle on asked for rear gear ratio as in input variable.
 
1

1969mach1351

Member
Apr 18, 2003
285
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Jun 22, 2004
#7
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #7
When my brother went to a dyno they did two pulls in 4th and two in 3rd. Both 3rd gear pulls were about 8 horsepower more than 4th. I asked the guy why that was and he just said "Dunno, some cars just like 3rd gear."
 
C

customperforman

New Member
Sep 6, 2003
98
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Jun 22, 2004
#8
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #8
These guys all have the right idea. i will add that we have dyno'd the same car in 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th and we only see ~3% difference in numbers until you get to the overdrive(s).

tires do affect the numbers you get, even though, its not factored in. the more tire you have, the more you lose through friction. weve seen a 50 hp loss going from street tires to wide slicks!

dynos measure the car's ability to overcome the inertia of heave drums. the rate of the acceleration of the drums is used by the computer software to calculate power.

something interesting that we've been playing around with is pinion angles. drag cars, especially, are gaining/losing significant power through changes in pinion angles.

Rick
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jun 22, 2004
#9
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #9
are gaining/losing significant power through changes in pinion angles
Click to expand...
This is exactly why I always argue that pinion angle needs to be checked when installing a non-stock drivetrain such as a T-5/Tremec in and older Mustang.....the increase in drivetrain angle you get by using commercially available x-members instead of doing the needed surgery can/will cost you power due to inefficiently large pinion angles if you actually shim the pinion to compensate for the increased engine/tranny angle. This is just another reason I always champion tunnel mods and custom homebuilt x-members to get the transmission in correctly.
 

67coupe351w

New Member
Jan 31, 2004
424
0
0
Portland, OR
Jun 23, 2004
#10
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #10
I would suppose the pinion angle would matter becasue the U-joint is less efficent when it is having to compensate for an angle vs when it is just straight.

So a rear end ratio is required?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Monday at 1:31 AM
X-cam34
X
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
593
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
617
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Electrical Innovate PSB-1 is DOA? Am I an idiot? All plausable. Please Help
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
480
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 26, 2025
Dontknowchit
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?