• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

dyno session, what a reality check lol

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbonella
  • Start date Start date May 17, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
May 17, 2010
#21
  • May 17, 2010
  • #21
Remember the old addage: "302 parts make 302 power." If you want to make more power to the 357's peak potential, you're going to have to step up your combo in all regards, I think. Your engine is asthmatic. The alphabet cam and GT40 heads are choking it to death.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
May 17, 2010
#22
  • May 17, 2010
  • #22
I read your parts list before seeing the dyno #s, I guessed 280hp 325tq,so I was pretty close. cam is your weak point, put in a big cam, hp could go to 320 at 6,000rpm, torque drop to 320 at 4,500.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
May 18, 2010
#23
  • May 18, 2010
  • #23
1991notchbackLX said:
Remember the old addage: "302 parts make 302 power." If you want to make more power to the 357's peak potential, you're going to have to step up your combo in all regards, I think. Your engine is asthmatic. The alphabet cam and GT40 heads are choking it to death.
Click to expand...

gaahhh...beat me to it! nothing more true....personally, i'd ditch the intake, heads, and cam for something more suitable for a 357. not to add salt to an open wound, but my car with factory e7's made only 8hp less than you....
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
May 18, 2010
#24
  • May 18, 2010
  • #24
all make great points, and you're right...couple of you replied to previous posts and said the same thing...302 parts make 302 power and that makes perfect sense to me. I never pulled the trigger on a h/c/i package I was scoping out this winter and now I am highly considering warming my credit card up haha.

You know whats cool? My stang has been on the back burner for YEARS and yesterday's dyno day with 20+ rad stangs......it re-lit the fire, always does

ummmm can I have TFS high ports
Ed Curtis cam
Super Vic EFI?
I wish haha
Peace!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 18, 2010
#25
  • May 18, 2010
  • #25
Yea, your top end is just way too small.

Honestly, I think that with a better breathing top end and a tune, you'll gain everywhere. I think that not only will you see a LOT more HP, but you'll also see more torque. You're just not filling the cylinders with air. That whole top end has to go, though.
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
May 18, 2010
#26
  • May 18, 2010
  • #26
90lxcoupe said:
Well you are using a cam thats designed for a 302 that is out of date technology wise and an intake that is also way to small for the size of the motor, i'd say the heads are too small too but you should be able to make decent power with those. the fact that it only makes power to 4700 says it all.

Re-think the combo and make use of what you can but get rid of the parts that were designed for 50 less cubic inches with technology thats 20 years old. I dont think that alphabet cams are bad, they are great on a budget, but they have their place
Click to expand...

1991notchbackLX said:
Remember the old addage: "302 parts make 302 power." If you want to make more power to the 357's peak potential, you're going to have to step up your combo in all regards, I think. Your engine is asthmatic. The alphabet cam and GT40 heads are choking it to death.
Click to expand...

 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 19, 2010
#27
  • May 19, 2010
  • #27
Does seem a bit weak to me. You would benefit from more cam and a better intake for sure.
 
9

91foxbod50

Member
Sep 26, 2007
486
0
16
May 19, 2010
#28
  • May 19, 2010
  • #28
Yeah i agree that intake isnt the best. I was running the same hci on my blown 306 minus the cam. Another guy same set up with a set of eddlebrocks and a trickflow upper and lower made more then 50 hp over mine. And he had less fuel.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Y
Dyno Comparison for TFS 44cc Ported Heads vs PI Ported Heads with same VT Stage 2 Cams
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Oct 13, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
9K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?