madams74 said:
You guys act like this is some kind of technology. This is not a Pentium I 33MHZ vs. a Pentium IV 2.5 GIG race. People are still using the same style mufflers from 50 years ago today, they still use the same style carbs, they still use the same style valves, last I heard pistons were still round. The basic idea is that what you have cost more money than what we have and therefore it must be better. You think that the E-cam is outdated and your cam is the most modern cam for all mustangs. Let me ask you this. What will a future cam bring to my 306? In another decade from today are you telling us that the cam of today will be outdated? Maybe you should tell those HEMI guys from the 70's that they should use a different motor in their cars because they are 25 years old now. PLEASE!!!!! They would STOMP you and me today!
actually, you are wrong. it IS technology. we have come along way just as we dhave with the computer. the e cam has really lazy ramp rates and needs alot more compression than our little small blocks have without a built motor.
there is zero degrees of over lap.... making it suitable for blowers but not the best all motor cam, and its a single pattern design which works real well for the plethora of aftermarket heads
most of the heads here sit somewhere in the 70s% i/e ratio, most every head here will benifit form a split duration, many times a big split. the only heads thats are getting close to being ok with a single pattern are the afr and some of the bigger heads which we dont use here
and your trying to compare big cube High compression to our tiny small block blower worthy compression motors
also people look at the advertised .050 duration and think one cam is "bigger" when you nee dto look at the degrees at a number of lifts.
the e cam has what 280/280 0 overlap and 220/220 at .050 degrees
while a modern cam might 220 at .050 and only be only 276 of overall duration.this means the cam is opening up much faster
this modern cam opens much faster has a fatter lob. It spends more tim in higher lift ranges, hence higher flow.
go to
www.ls1tech.com and read the cam theory threads