• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

edelbrock manifold finally released

  • Thread starter Thread starter Green&GoldGT
  • Start date Start date Sep 25, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Green&GoldGT

Member
Aug 1, 2005
302
0
17
Virginia
Sep 25, 2007
#1
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #1
Well I just happened to visit the edelbrock website to see that they released the 4.6l 2v intake manifold. But typically you cant find a price and it will be a few months before we get real dyno results. I try and call edelbrock tomorrow but just letting you guys and gals know.
 

lvmustanggt

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
721
0
0
Las Vegas
Sep 26, 2007
#2
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #2
here the link
looks very sexy, hope it put out some hp and less money I will get one my self
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/mc/manifolds/ford_sb_vic-jr.shtml
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Sep 26, 2007
#3
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #3
Still confused if this is a carb or fi manifold. I was looking at it the other day and some said carb, some said fi. The picture it has injector bosses and its in the shape of the upper plenum. I saw it and was impressed.

If its in the $300 range ill get one and "help" my stock plastic crossover PI crack, lol.
 

96GTstang46

New Member
Nov 20, 2006
142
0
0
Seattle, Washington
Sep 26, 2007
#4
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #4
BurningRubber- Helping your manifold crack.... Good one..

For $300 that would have to be the cheapest aftermarket manifold i have seen. All the others like the P51, Typhoon, Trickflow are all about $600-700 bucks but that would be a tight manifold for the price...
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Sep 26, 2007
#5
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #5
doesn't bolt up to NPI heads tho huh?
 

superstang01

Active Member
Oct 11, 2006
448
9
29
Kingston, On, Canada
Sep 26, 2007
#6
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #6
i think you can use it on EFI and you can use it to convert over to carbureted....i dont see why anyone woul dwant to do that though lol
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Sep 26, 2007
#7
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #7
Yeah, its says it takes any 1999-2004 SOHC Modular 4.6L engine and convert it for use with a carburetor.
 
M

mineralgraygt

Member
Jan 4, 2006
187
0
16
nj
Sep 26, 2007
#8
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #8
i seen the intake on the mmr website it going for 399
 

Green&GoldGT

Member
Aug 1, 2005
302
0
17
Virginia
Sep 26, 2007
#9
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #9
They have a fuel rail kit that is available on the edelbrock website so I'm wondering if it's required.

The manifold looks more of a reicard intake manifold with the short, straight runners. And we all know how much power that makes on a stock or mild setup.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Sep 26, 2007
#10
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #10
mineralgraygt said:
i seen the intake on the mmr website it going for 399
Click to expand...

Yep, thats what I saw also. Thats what has my interest big time... it looks bad ass also!!!
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Sep 26, 2007
#11
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #11
So, I wonder if this adapter would work with the manifold and allow you to use a cobra TB???

LINK!
 

MrGame

Member
Nov 8, 2006
52
0
7
Sep 27, 2007
#12
  • Sep 27, 2007
  • #12
Manifold also available with injector bosses for fuel injection
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 27, 2007
#13
  • Sep 27, 2007
  • #13
2900RPM-7900RPM
You guys better have a built motor, heads and CAMS before you shell out for one of these.
Its a simular setup as on my 66...victor Jr intake. Car will nail 7500RPM without issue. Mine is rated 3000-8000RPM I believe.
Point is that these are HIGH RPM intakes, designed for topend HP. I wouldnt doubt a total loss below 5500RPMs. Note the super short (for mods) runners....yea, ill pass. Torque will suffer way too much for a street car.

Best suited for VERY high revving N/A GTs and high revving centri charged GTs.
 

Skud

Member
Sep 10, 2003
493
0
17
Saskatchewan
Sep 28, 2007
#14
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #14
I have a built Ford 400 (~375hp/400+tq, boat anchor my ass!! ) with a Wieand Stealth dual-plane manifold. It's considered to be a "good" street intake manifold from idle to ~5500rpm. Its runners are lucky to be half as long as the runners on a stock 4.6 intake. In fact, from my limited experience it looks as though the 4.6 has the longest intake runner length of any V8 I've seen.

Same thing with the 302 and the 289 (similar displacement to the 4.6); you buy any aftermarket intake and the runners will be nowhere near as long as the runners on a stock 4.6 plastic manifold and you can get good torque and power in a decent powerband. Yet you put an intake with "similar" design on a 4.6 and it's suddenly useless for street use. The powerband is just way too high.

Is the issue the valve shrouding, lack of displacement, port volume, or all of the above?

Am I missing something?


Riley
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Sep 28, 2007
#15
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #15
* Not legal for sale or use on pollution controlled motor vehicles.
 

lazerred02

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
190
1
0
FT Stewart, GA
Sep 28, 2007
#16
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #16
CatmanJJ said:
* Not legal for sale or use on pollution controlled motor vehicles.
Click to expand...

Everything says that man, that does'nt really matter unless you live in a really strictly enforced emissions state.
 

Green&GoldGT

Member
Aug 1, 2005
302
0
17
Virginia
Sep 28, 2007
#17
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #17
SilverBullet00 said:
So, I wonder if this adapter would work with the manifold and allow you to use a cobra TB???

LINK!
Click to expand...

The only thing that's bad about the manifold is the opening. It was designed for edelbrock's universal throttle body(which is over $400), and the opening is not shaped like a normal oval plenum. A plenum might bolt up.

The Sullivan might fit but that is already another $320 bucks on top of the manifold cost.
 
H

HELLIONGT

New Member
Apr 7, 2008
0
0
0
Sep 24, 2008
#18
  • Sep 24, 2008
  • #18
I've been looking at this intake as well. i have cracked 2 of the factory plastic ones. Couldnt I just make a spacer that will bolt to the intake as well as my stock elbow? Seems that wouldnt be that hard.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Sep 24, 2008
#19
  • Sep 24, 2008
  • #19
I've seen local testing of this on SCS owner's cars. It's certainly does its job.
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Sep 24, 2008
#20
  • Sep 24, 2008
  • #20
A guy down at my brothers shop got one installed(will have a pic up soon) used a after market plenum for the 4.6, built D.S.S block, and a procharger. the car started w/ 500rwhp@5200rpm. just a tune and that intake the car made 562rwhp! 62rwhp @6500rpm! My brother told that the intake is only good if you have some boost.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
554
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
S
Shout out to LMR
  • SVTCobrapilot
  • Apr 16, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2023
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?