• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

elderbrock performer or afr 165 heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyler16
  • Start date Start date Sep 2, 2010
T

Tyler16

New Member
Jul 29, 2009
39
0
0
Sep 2, 2010
#1
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #1
I have search everywhere and cannot find a good comparison between the performer heads and afr 165 heads. At the moment the AFR 165's are on back order on just about every site so are these elderbrocks just as good?
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,244
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
Sep 2, 2010
#2
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #2
Though it doesnt tell the entire story, if you can find each ones flow numbers and compare them, that usually gives a good idea on how the head can perform. A lot has to do with waht you pick as a supporting combo. Are you throwing in a cam and intake to compliment the heads? What size throttle body do you have? Motor size? NA? Forced induction? I know the Edelbrock E - series aluminum heads (170CC) arent that far behind the 165s in terms of flow. Toward the end of the cam lift range, they were pretty damn close. Close enough for me that I am strongly considering the pair of assembled E- streets ($920) over the AFR 165s ($1400). For one, I drive my car maybe a few times a week tops lately so I dont care if I squeeze every fathomable ounce of power out, and not to mention I can think of a couple other things I could use that extra 500 dollars toward. Solid steering shaft, Kenne Bell, supporting mods for Kenne Bell, etc. The site selling the heads usually posts the flow numbers at the bottom of the page.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 2, 2010
#3
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #3
All of these flow numbers are at .500" lift because that is the most pertinent for that size head.

AFR 165 heads start at 232/184cfm
Edelbrock E-street flows at 242/162cfm
Edelbrock Performer RPM heads flow 245/170cfm.

The Edelbrocks do better on the intake and not as well on the exhaust. For the difference in price, I would go with the Edelbrock heads. If you are still concerned with the exhaust flow, you could always get the exhaust ports and bowls cleaned out on the Edelbrock heads, and still be better off price wise than the AFRs.

Kurt
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Sep 2, 2010
#4
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #4
I like the Edle's also
 
T

Tyler16

New Member
Jul 29, 2009
39
0
0
Sep 3, 2010
#5
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #5
Sounds good to me. I was wondering about the exhaust side but I will be getting the intake port matched anyway. Thanks for the input! BTW I was looking at holley systemax intakes and for now unknown on the cam. I have an Ecam but I don't know how well it would perform...any ideas?
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Sep 3, 2010
#6
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #6
It is a good thing we race flow benches.

Adam
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 3, 2010
#7
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #7
I'd go with a custom cam. I wouldn't bother with the E-cam. Holley Systemax is a little big for those heads. You can get a smaller intake cheaper that will work just fine.

Kurt
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,244
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
Sep 3, 2010
#8
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #8
In response to post #6...
Zero_chance said:
Though it doesnt tell the entire story, if you can find each ones flow numbers and compare them, that usually gives a good idea on how the head can perform. A lot has to do with what you pick as a supporting combo. Are you throwing in a cam and intake to compliment the heads? What size throttle body do you have? Motor size? NA? Forced induction?
Click to expand...
Like has been said, for the relatively low price difference compared to an off the shelf cam, you might as well go custom once you figure out what you're doing in regard to supporting and additional mods to the engine.
 

hollywoodstang

Active Member
May 23, 2006
1,095
2
36
Sep 4, 2010
#9
  • Sep 4, 2010
  • #9
4Jenna said:
I like the Edle's also
Click to expand...

Me too. But why is AFR on back order? Did they run out of aluminum? lol.
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Sep 4, 2010
#10
  • Sep 4, 2010
  • #10
Trickflows are best of both worlds , 170cc but they flow more like a afr185 , if you look some places have them about the same price as the afr 165s
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 4, 2010
#11
  • Sep 4, 2010
  • #11
+1 on the Trick Flow heads.

Kurt
 
1

1killercoupe

New Member
Jan 28, 2012
26
0
1
Mar 20, 2012
#12
  • Mar 20, 2012
  • #12
im leaning toward edelbrock performer for my 88 coupe with a stock bottom end and speed density
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
261
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine Felpro 9333 pt1 (with 8psi boost)
  • JD1964
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
768
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
199
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
Engine Heads and how to buy
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
177
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?