• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Exhaust Leak Cause Rich or Lean Condition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stanger007
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2006

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Dec 20, 2006
#1
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #1
I'm running a bit rich at the top end of the track so I've been doing some datalogging leaning things out. Saw something while I was doing this...

I noticed today that my KAMRFs at idle/cruise are around 3-5% different between the two. I've got the MAF curve spot on and injector timing squared away as well.

One K hovers very close to 1.000, the other reads as pulling fuel at around .97-.95.

First off, in Calcon, is KAMRF2 (the one reading rich) on the driver's side? If no one knows I'll just datalog one sensor and see which one is which. It's raining now and I don't feel like messing with the car in the rain.

My W/B is in passenger side and it seems to be reading spot on for the AFR I'm shooting for at idle and cruise.

Thanks guys,
Wes
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Dec 20, 2006
#2
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #2
It quit raining... KAMRF2 is the driver's side.

Now to figure out why I'm reading richer on that side than the other...
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 20, 2006
#3
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #3
My KAMFR and Lambse rarely read the same on each side

I've never worried all that much about it

Not sure here, but at least it would seem if you pull in additional air upstream from your WB, it would sense a false rich reading

Grady
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Dec 20, 2006
#4
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #4
final5-0 said:
My KAMFR and Lambse rarely read the same on each side
Click to expand...
Agreed - mine are different but normally somewhat in sync. This time, however, one side is constantly 3-5% rich when the other is dead on. Looking at old data logs, this is a new thing.

Both O2s are relatively new - might swap them and see if the trend swaps along with them.

Trying to get little issues like this nailed down before I pile on the boost.

Thanks for the input Grady!

Wes
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Dec 20, 2006
#5
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #5
Reading through my EEC book, the O2 sensors measure the presence or absence of oxygen in the exhaust stream.

Excess oxygen is a sign of a lean mixture.
The lack of oxygen is a signal or a rich mixture.

The driver's side O2 looks to be cycling between .07v and .79v... pretty normal.

Wideband in passenger side says I'm idling between 14.8:1 and 14.0:1.

The difference is most noticable at idle (low exhaust flow).

I'll have to check for an exhaust leak on the passenger side - my EGR bung may be leaking a bit causing that side to think it's running leaner than it really is and causing my driver's side to run a tad rich. Might re-tighten header bolts as well just to be safe.

Glad this is the only "problem" I have with my 'stang though... could be a lot worse off.

Wes
 

m0l0

Member
Nov 20, 2005
178
0
17
Dec 20, 2006
#6
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #6
Well i have kinda the same "issue" the first datalogs displayed equal karmfs, but now i have a top 3% diference , i think there is nothing wrong to see top 5% of diference between banks, more diference and you will be looking a header leaks/bad o2

Just my 2c.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 21, 2006
#7
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #7
Stanger007 said:
Reading through my EEC book, the O2 sensors measure the presence or absence of oxygen in the exhaust stream.

Excess oxygen is a sign of a lean mixture.
The lack of oxygen is a signal or a rich mixture.

The driver's side O2 looks to be cycling between .07v and .79v... pretty normal.

Wideband in passenger side says I'm idling between 14.8:1 and 14.0:1.

The difference is most noticable at idle (low exhaust flow).

I'll have to check for an exhaust leak on the passenger side - my EGR bung may be leaking a bit causing that side to think it's running leaner than it really is and causing my driver's side to run a tad rich. Might re-tighten header bolts as well just to be safe.

Glad this is the only "problem" I have with my 'stang though... could be a lot worse off.

Wes
Click to expand...

Well Wes

What can I say but ............

More O2 means Less fuel!

DON'T FOLLOW ME I'M LOST

I do agree about your concern the banks have just recently started to read the larger than normal range difference.

Grady
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
Dec 25, 2006
#8
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #8
final5-0 said:
More O2 means Less fuel!
Click to expand...

We're saying the exact same thing.

You're speaking of the reading in terms of BEFORE the adaptive strategy tries to compensate - I'm talking about what the EEC will do as a result of the reading.

Sounds like we're on the same page just looking at it from two different angles.

Merry Christmas!
Wes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
17
Views
612
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 11:05 PM
infamous
I
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
727
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
888
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
"Tuning" Vortech kit with FMU discs- question
  • nicholase
  • Jun 22, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 13, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?