• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Exhaust Question: Which increased hp the most

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98GTBlk
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2004

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Aug 15, 2004
#1
  • Aug 15, 2004
  • #1
Sup guys. Im sure this question has been thrown around a bit. Ive tried searching the forums and came up with nothing. So if you got a link to a previous thread of this topic let me know. But basically i just want to know which make or which style of mufflers gives me the most hp gain. which most torque gain? Im thinking of doing one chamber like an slp loudmouth good/bad?

thanks.
 

98GTBlk

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
59
0
0
Connecticut
Aug 16, 2004
#2
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #2
thanks for all the help, clowns.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Aug 16, 2004
#3
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #3
mufflers are for sound. I wouldnt expect much when slapping in some mufflers.
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Aug 16, 2004
#4
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #4
98GTBlk said:
Sup guys. Im sure this question has been thrown around a bit. Ive tried searching the forums and came up with nothing. So if you got a link to a previous thread of this topic let me know. But basically i just want to know which make or which style of mufflers gives me the most hp gain. which most torque gain? Im thinking of doing one chamber like an slp loudmouth good/bad?

thanks.
Click to expand...

On the exhaust side, most horsepower is gained from LT headers (15-20 rhwp)and a performance mid-pipe (8-10 rwhp). The cat-back exhaust system is primarily for sound, although some gains can be expected. At www.mach1review.com, they compared the performance gains of three cat-back systems on a Mach I: Bassani, Magnaflow, and SLP. The SLP gained 8.5 rwhp and 14.9 rwt. The Magnaflow gained 12.5 rwhp and 8.2 rwt. The Bassani gained 4.3 rwhp and 8.6 rwt.
 

70stangcoupe

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
2,895
0
0
Winston-Salem, NC
Aug 16, 2004
#5
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #5
Magnaflow seems to be the performance exhaust as far as Mufflers go. When mated with an off road X pipe, I felt a difference.

You're going to need Long Tubed Headers, NOT shortys.

You're going to need an off-road pipe. X makes more power than H, they say.

You're going to need a catback. I suggest Magnaflow.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Aug 16, 2004
#6
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #6
70stangcoupe said:
X makes more power than H, they say.
Click to expand...


Unless you get ProChamber
mixed with magnaflow Cat back...
 
G

Grady96GT

New Member
May 30, 2004
45
0
0
Texas
Aug 16, 2004
#7
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #7
Non catted midpipe make more power than catted. I gained only .1-.2 on my quarter mile time with 40flows that I welded in. Could just be I learned to drive a bit better though.
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Aug 16, 2004
#8
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #8
Grady96GT said:
Non catted midpipe make more power than catted. I gained only .1-.2 on my quarter mile time with 40flows that I welded in. Could just be I learned to drive a bit better though.
Click to expand...

Unless you had something seriously restricting flow, the mufflers did not yield you 2 tenths in the 1/4, ESPECIALLY not with flows.I'm gonna say you were driving better.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Aug 16, 2004
#9
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #9
I'v eseen several articles on this topic. General findings were Headers: long tube's make most hp, Mid-Pipe: the Prochamber makes the most hp. Cat-Back: Not a very big difference in hp, pretty much all make good power.

To recap...long tubes, prochamber, what ever cat-back you want.
 
S

spikeGT_99

New Member
May 3, 2004
184
0
0
Jackson, Ms
Aug 16, 2004
#10
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #10
dynomax ultraflos are great mufflers, although they are overlooked a lot on here because they are "too quiet" personally i kinda like the stealth thing, i actually read on turbomustangs.com that they got 25rwhp by switching from a flowmaster to a dynomax ultraflo catback, this was on a forced induction car so your gains would only be a fraction of that, but im pretty sure the dynomax are some of the highest flowing muffs out there, just wanted to throw dynomax in there cuz they tend to get ignored on here a lot
-Spike
 

ironmedic

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,361
0
0
Puyallup, WA
Aug 16, 2004
#11
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #11
how hard is a LT header swap on a 4.6 GT/Cobra? i know they can be a PITA on a 5.0!!
 

GTvert01

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
636
0
0
West Plains, MO
Aug 17, 2004
#12
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #12
IronMedic said:
how hard is a LT header swap on a 4.6 GT/Cobra? i know they can be a PITA on a 5.0!!
Click to expand...

I'd say twice the effort.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 17, 2004
#13
  • Aug 17, 2004
  • #13
Buy an exhaust system based on sound preference or build quality (stainless vs standard steel). Pretty much any 2 1/2 inch system is going to be comparable at basic bolt on levels and doesn't really start to make a lot of difference until horsepower levels start to climb above 400 or so.

But a pretty standard system for most bolt on cars should be LT headers backed by some sort of high flow catted or O/R 2 ½ inch mid-pipe and cat-back. People buying shorty headers are usually only doing so because of cost or fitment issues involved with installing long tubes. Don’t be left with the impression that louder is better. Most loud strait through or single chamber mufflers are that way because backpressure is nearly eliminated. Reducing backpressure is a good thing, but it’s a good idea to allow for some backpressure within the system to keep lower and mid range torque levels high. Not to mention that although the loud exhaust may sound great at a stoplight, or revving it out for your buddies. It quickly becomes tiresome on those days that you actually want to hear anything going on around you…..like say the radio or the voices in your head.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
213
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
679
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?