• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

FAILED EMISSIONS! Have a few questions...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1990LXDropTop
  • Start date Start date Apr 19, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Apr 19, 2005
#1
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #1
Well I went to get my car inspected today here in MA. It passed everything with flying colors except for one component of the emissions. The part it failed was "HC grams per mile." My reading was 3.95 and the limit is 2.00. Everything else such as C0 grams, N0x grams, C02 grams, etc. the car was well within the limits. The guy was nice about it and said the car was simply running a little rich. My fuel pressure is set at 40psi with the vacuum off, my timing is at 16* initial, and I am running 93 octane fuel. It also has the stock 4 cat h-pipe on. My mods are listed in my sig. What should I do that would help me pass? Retard the timing? Lower the fuel pressure? Run some dry gas?
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Apr 19, 2005
#2
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #2
Give this a shot. Go to advance auto, or autozone, one of those places. Look for a box of fuel additive called guarenteed to pass. I used it last year and got through emissions with 2 cats blown slam out. Considering you are only off a point or 2, it will work wonders for your car. If you cant find it, try putting some regular gas in it, adjust your timing to keep you from spark knocking if needed, and try it that way .
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Apr 19, 2005
#3
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #3
Here's the link to dump the computer codes with only a jumper wire or paper clip and the check engine light, or test light or voltmeter. I’ve used it for years, and it works great.

See http://www.troublecodes.net/Ford/
OR
See http://www.dalidesign.com/hbook/eectest.html for more descriptive help
OR
See http://www.mustangworks.com/articles/electronics/eec-iv_codes.html

IF your car is an 86-88 stang, you'll have to use the test lamp or voltmeter method. There is no functional check engine light on the 86-88's except possibly the Cali Mass Air cars.

Codes have different answers if the engine is running from the answers that it has when the engine isn't running. It helps a lot to know if you had the engine running when you ran the test.

Trouble codes are either 2 digit or 3 digit, there are no cars that use both 2 digit codes and 3 digit codes.

For those who are intimidated by all the wires & connections, see http://www.actron.com/product_detail.php?pid=16153 for what a typical hand scanner looks like. Normal retail price is about $30 or so at AutoZone or Walmart.

Or for a nicer scanner see http://www.midwayautosupply.com/detailedproductdescription.asp?3829 – It has a 3 digit LCD display so that you don’t have to count flashes or beeps.. Cost is $33.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Apr 19, 2005
#4
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #4
I just ran my codes and got codes:

67: Nuetral safety switch (this code always came up since I bought the car)
34: EGR valve (my vacuum was not connected so I connected it)
87: Fuel pump relay (I swapped fuel pumps a couple weeks ago and never reset the computer. Maybe that could cause this code to come up?)

I checked my TPS and it was at 1.01, so I set it to .98. My fuel pressure it set at 40, but I think I may set it to 36-38 to lean it out a bit before I go for the re-test). Tomorrow I'm going to get my friend's timing gun and retard my timing to 12* and take things from there. Hopefully I will pass the re-test. Like I said everything was great except for the HC's because it was running too rich.
 

Funanin

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2001
356
0
0
Horsham, Pennsylvania
Apr 19, 2005
#5
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #5
not positive but i think not having your EGR hooked up and functioning properly would cause you to run rich.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Apr 19, 2005
#6
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #6
Funanin said:
not positive but i think not having your EGR hooked up and functioning properly would cause you to run rich.
Click to expand...

Well it was hooked up, but I had the wrong vacuum line going to it. Would that make a difference? I accidentally snapped my original EGR line a few weeks ago while removing the upper plenum. I was lazy about it and just used one of the lines that originally went to the smog system, as I deleted my smog and had no other use for the line. I guess it makes a difference because code 34 (EGR valve not opening/closing properly) came up when I ran my codes today.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 19, 2005
#7
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #7
The EGR not being hooked up could be causing some problems, but I think the fuel pressure is probably a little high. Is there a fine for not passing the second time through, or do they just tell you to come back later? If the latter, then try backing off the pressure, if only for the duration of the test. If you may be fined or suffer other repercutions then back off the fuel and try the fuel additive. It should work.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Apr 19, 2005
#8
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #8
EGR does not get constant vacuum so you had the wrong line on it. I *think* egr only works at idle and part throttle.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Apr 19, 2005
#9
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #9
vristang said:
The EGR not being hooked up could be causing some problems, but I think the fuel pressure is probably a little high. Is there a fine for not passing the second time through, or do they just tell you to come back later? If the latter, then try backing off the pressure, if only for the duration of the test. If you may be fined or suffer other repercutions then back off the fuel and try the fuel additive. It should work.
Click to expand...

No there is no fine. I get a free re-test, but if it fails again I have to pay another $30 for another inspection. Right now I have the big red "R" sticker on it which expires in 60 days. In other words I have 60 days to get the free re-test.

Also guys, you think the timing could be contributing it as well? Right now it's at 16*. Should I set it to the stock 10*, or maybe just retard it to 12* or 14*? I reset the computer and have the correct line connected to the EGR valve. Maybe if I retard the timing a bit, lower the fuel pressure, and run a few bottles of dry gas? Would I have a better chance of passing then?
 
J

jmattix1

New Member
Aug 29, 2004
8
0
0
Apr 19, 2005
#10
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #10
jmattix1

I had the same problem in WA. I ended up putting on two new cats that take the place of the OEM four on the car. My EGR valve was also not working so it was replaced. The O/2 sensors were also bad. The inspection station told me that after the work was completed this is the cleanest mustang they have ever tested. Not cheap but it will be good for a long time now.
 

MustangMuscle86

New Member
Sep 25, 2004
24
0
0
North Ridgeville,Ohio
Apr 19, 2005
#11
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #11
I'd retard the timing to the stock 10* just for the test and also do the fuel additive.
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Apr 21, 2005
#12
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #12
New cat's can really make the difference. the old h-pipe technology seems to be lacking.

Don't forget to change your oil before you go as well.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Apr 21, 2005
#13
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #13
If you really want to fix the problem, dump the codes. The computer's built in diagnostic software knows what's working & what isn't.

You can guess all you want, throw parts and money at it and never get it fixed. OR you can dump the codes, post them & get answers on how to fix the offending items. It is the best path to success and the easiest on your wallet too.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Apr 21, 2005
#14
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #14
jrichker said:
If you really want to fix the problem, dump the codes. The computer's built in diagnostic software knows what's working & what isn't.

You can guess all you want, throw parts and money at it and never get it fixed. OR you can dump the codes, post them & get answers on how to fix the offending items. It is the best path to success and the easiest on your wallet too.
Click to expand...

You should really read the previous posts before posting.
 
I

iapexl8r

Member
Apr 1, 2005
254
0
17
Apr 23, 2005
#15
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #15
my guess is the timing, that will greatly effect the emissions. chris
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Apr 23, 2005
#16
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #16
1990LXDropTop said:
You should really read the previous posts before posting.
Click to expand...
Sorry. my apology. I missed your previous post of the codes. Here's some EGR help...

EGR operational theory:
The EGR system has a vacuum source (line from the intake manifold) that goes to the EVR, computer operated electronic vacuum regulator. The EGR valve and the passages in the heads and intake manifold route exhaust gas to the EGR spacer (throttle body spacer). The computer uses RPM, Load. and some other factors to tell the EVR to pass vacuum to open the EGR valve. The EGR sensor tells the computer how far the EGR valve is open. Then computer adjusts the signal sent to the EVR to hold, increase or decrease the vacuum. The computer adds spark advance to compensate for the recirculated gases and the slower rate they burn at.


The EGR shuts off at Wide Open Throttle (WOT), so it has minimal effect on performance. The addition of exhaust gas drops combustion temperature, increases gas mileage and reduces the tendency of the engine to ping. It can also reduce HC emissions by reducing fuel consumption.

Code 34 Or 334 - EGR voltage above closed limit - Failed sensor, carbon between EGR pintle valve and seat holding the valve off its seat. Remove the EGR valve and clean it with carbon remover. Prior to re-installing see if you can blow air through the flange side of the EGR by mouth. If it leaks, there is carbon stuck on the pintle valve seat, replace the EGR valve ($85-$95).

If the blow by test passes, and you have replaced the sensor, then you have sensor electrical ground problems. Check the resistance between the black/white wire on the MAP/BARO sensor and then the black/white wire on the EGR and the same wire on the TPS. It should be less than 1 ohm. Next check the resistance between the black/white wire and the negative battery post. It should be less than 1 ohm.

Note that all resistance tests must be done with power off. Measuring resistance with a circuit powered on will give false readings and possibly damage the meter.

This will affect idle quality by diluting the intake air charge

Code 87 – fuel pump primary circuit failure. The fuel pump lost power while the engine was running. Check fuel pump relay, check inertia switch, wiring to/from inertia switch, red wire going to inertia switch for +12volts. Check the other side of inertia switch for +12 volts.

To help troubleshoot the 87 code, follow this link for a wiring diagram for 89-93 cars [urlhttp://www.autozone.com/servlet/UiBroker?ForwardPage=az/cds/en_us/0900823d/80/19/59/5a/0900823d8019595a.jsp [/url]

For 79-88 cars use, http://www.autozone.com/servlet/UiB..._us/0900823d/80/16/71/3c/0900823d8016713c.jsp

Code 67 - clutch not depressed (5 speed) or car not in neutral or park (auto) or A/C in On position when codes where dumped. Possible neutral safety switch or wiring problem. This code may prevent you from running the Key On Engine On tests. You can generally ignore this code, since it has no effect on engine performance.
 

mattkimsey

I've compiled a list to recap this thread:
Jan 22, 2004
346
0
0
Bessemer City NC
Apr 23, 2005
#17
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #17
My car failed....I backed the timing down to stock and put some guarenteed to pass in.....it passed
 

88GTtom

Member
Oct 22, 2003
198
0
17
Woodbridge NJ
Apr 24, 2005
#18
  • Apr 24, 2005
  • #18
put 87 in the tank with 10 degrees timing should do the trick. i went yesterday here in NJ and passed with flying colors. oh ya, romp on her before you go, get those cats nice and hot.
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Apr 25, 2005
#19
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #19
88GTtom said:
put 87 in the tank with 10 degrees timing should do the trick. i went yesterday here in NJ and passed with flying colors. oh ya, romp on her before you go, get those cats nice and hot.
Click to expand...

Do you run a smog pump?
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Apr 25, 2005
#20
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #20
Just and FYI, I recently passed here in Ca. with everything in the sig. I didn't do any tweaking beforehand but I guess every little bit helps. I'll try to remember to look over my numbers when I get home. Hopefully it was the egr/vacuum causing the problem.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
R
1994 GT 5.0L crank no start
  • Red1994MustangGT
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2025
Kurt_MO
K
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
487
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
J
Engine No power after idle
  • JustinTilley86
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 23, 2024
General karthief
S
Fuel Spits sputter pops and bangs under load. Help wanted
  • sickntired
  • Mar 23, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2024
sickntired
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?