• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

fox or sn95??

  • Thread starter Thread starter super302
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 26, 2004
#1
  • Jul 26, 2004
  • #1
I am going to sell my car pretty soon (not a vert fan), anyways, i was thinking about either another 87-93 gt or a 95-95 gt, i was wondering what one is quicker, handles better, easy to mod, etc....also would my u/d's work on a sn95?? What about headers??

I do like the interior of an sn95 better, but i think the fox's have a really cool body design, i can't decide, can someone help me....oh, this will be a daily driver.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 27, 2004
#2
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #2
the SN95's are much tamer and have problems with detonation and such. weight more and put out less HP.

depends what body style you like though.

you gotta keep the vert!
 

cjman15

Banned
Apr 15, 2004
1,009
0
0
Fairfield, PA
Jul 27, 2004
#3
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #3
FOX
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jul 27, 2004
#4
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #4
sn95 are too ugly, to me at least. they are heavier as well.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Jul 27, 2004
#5
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #5
SN95's are heavier than fox's, just depends on what your visual apeal is...94/95 is going to be more "new" (usualy) , fox's are nice...pretty simple and light. Heck, i got one
 

89CopCoupe

Banned
Feb 17, 2004
606
0
0
Post Count City
Jul 27, 2004
#6
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #6
mr_woodster said:
SN95's are heavier than fox's, just depends on what your visual apeal is...94/95 is going to be more "new" (usualy) , fox's are nice...pretty simple and light. Heck, i got one
Click to expand...

'Chicks' prefer SN95s

Ps - Trade in that 2pac for a 6pack.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 27, 2004
#7
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #7
The SN95, aside from being a bit heavier, is a far superior platform from the factory. Much, much stiffer, lower drag coefficient, better handling, five lug wheels and four wheel brakes, wider track, longer wheelbase. They also give you the option of retaining the familiar 5.0 or going to the modular 4.6, unlike the Fox or the NewEdge stangs. SN95's also debuted the power moonroof option, which I would kill for in my GT (not a vert fan either ) Unfortunately, they never figured out how to make an SN95 hatchback. Parts tend to be a little more expensive, but it's negotiable. You are also much more likely to find one in good shape than a Fox- there are still a lot of one owner SN95's out there, unmolested chick cars and retirement rides right off the dealer lot just waiting to be traded in for a Caddy or a Honda. And as was mentioned, as a whole chicks generally do prefer them too... If I didn't love my Fox so much I'd be looking for a black '98 GT myself, or a red '95 Cobra; but I'm keeping this one forever. Maybe the wife would like one...
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Jul 27, 2004
#8
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #8
89CopCoupe said:
Ps - Trade in that 2pac for a 6pack.
Click to expand...


 

Gravel

Member
Mar 17, 2004
216
0
16
Bellingham WA
Jul 27, 2004
#9
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #9
I am a FOX man...

Sure chicks dig the Sn95, thats why you see so many driving them.....
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Jul 27, 2004
#10
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #10
easy boys, no hating on the sn95s, they'll catch wind of this thread and come over here in force.

Its all personal preference. Good luck
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Jul 27, 2004
#11
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #11
the foxes are lighter but that is not what I would call an advantage because they are built like a flimsy honda POS. The SN95's handle much better for the added stiffening.

I don't like the SN95 spaceship looking interior. While I do like the body style I still like the fox body style better also.
 
1

1hot5.0

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,615
0
0
Surprise, Arizona
Jul 27, 2004
#12
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #12
sirsureshot39 said:
easy boys, no hating on the sn95s, they'll catch wind of this thread and come over here in force.

Its all personal preference. Good luck
Click to expand...

Yup. I'm here representing the Sn95's in full force. j/k

All kidding aside, I would like to offer my opinion. Having owned a 91 5.0 LX convertible (auto) and now owning my current 94 GT auto, I can say that each has their own pro's and con's. As mentioned previosuly, the foxes tend to be harder to find in nicer shape than the Sn95's.

The Sn95 is a much more "refined" car if you will. Here are some things off the top of my head that A sn95 has that a fox dosen't:

- 5 lug
- 4 wheel disc brakes w/ abs
-If you choose to have an auto, they are electronically controlled and shift much better than AOD's.
-Mach 460 sound system (optional). It sounds good, but does not compare with a lot of the aftermarket.
-3g Alternator (130 amp)
-Electric Fan
-Strut Tower brace

Over all, it is a matter of what you want and like. I honestly have always wanted an Sn95, so I sold my '91 for one. However, I like foxes too and can say that a Notch will someday be in my driveway. You just can't beat the look of one IMO. Good luck, and let us know what you decide.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Jul 27, 2004
#13
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #13
I have owned a fox car and own a sn95 car now. After a while the SN95 has grown on me. The reason why I got it is because usually the paint is still in good condition. The interior is pretty nice. I chose it because I like the fact of the four wheel discs. If you drive in a fox and go 60-0 and then go in a SN95 and go 60-0 It is a whole new world of a difference. It is more of do you want to drag race and the extra 200lbs is gonna hurt you, or do you want a really comfortable daily driver which is some of both. I don't think my fox was uncomfortable but the sn95 definitely stands out in the comfort level.
 

Silver95Stint

New Member
Oct 28, 2003
350
0
0
England
Jul 28, 2004
#14
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #14
I have both and I would have to go with the 95, it just looks better IMO. And as someone mentioned earlier, the handling is better.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jul 28, 2004
#15
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #15
Seems clear from this what you want to do is buy a clean fox in the lightest weight version (notch); stiffen up the unibody with roll cage/subframe work; then add aftermarket suspension bits for handling (stangbear can help you with this); and the 4 wheel discs off the sn95. And if you need the car to get the chicks, well....
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jul 28, 2004
#16
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #16
I like 'em both! Get them all
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Jul 28, 2004
#17
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #17
Michael Yount said:
Seems clear from this what you want to do is buy a clean fox in the lightest weight version (notch); stiffen up the unibody with roll cage/subframe work; then add aftermarket suspension bits for handling (stangbear can help you with this); and the 4 wheel discs off the sn95. And if you need the car to get the chicks, well....
Click to expand...


And thats just what I did .

With the 99 v6 brake setup being much superior to the 94-98's...and the lighter notch...stopping has never been easier.

Another added bonus is that there is very few 94-95's that are able to run compairable times with compairable mods to a notch.
 

billetunderwear

I've posted way more than my fair share of pointle
20+ Year Stangneter
May 14, 2002
1,148
0
36
Rohnert Park, Ca
Jul 28, 2004
#18
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #18
stangbear427 said:
The SN95, aside from being a bit heavier, is a far superior platform from the factory. Much, much stiffer, lower drag coefficient, better handling, five lug wheels and four wheel brakes, ....
Click to expand...

4 wheel brakes? I call BS. I could have sworn they only had 2 wheel brakes.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Jul 28, 2004
#19
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #19
I have them both and I tend to prefer the FOX cars. However, the chassis on the new cars is lot better. If its a driver the SN95 is a better driving car. I freely admit that I hate my wifes convertible, but that's only because its a loaded 4.6/auto vert (The slowest GT ever built). There's no doubt that the 87-93's have an absolutely unique look and feel but the newer ones are better engineered.
 

Wil

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
581
0
0
Burke, VA
Jul 28, 2004
#20
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #20
Get the Fox, can't beat the look of them. I had a 01Gt and when it was time to get a new(used) car I didn't even consider a sn95. BTW, are GT still considered light?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
544
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Brakes Need help ID’ing which brake lines and seals I need
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Apr 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
794
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 14, 2025
limp
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
A
SN95 Hydroboost in a Fox | Brake lines
  • arc_jpiv
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
291
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 14, 2026
2000xp8
Project Fox Revival (please send help)
  • sleep-e
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?