• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

FRPP parts feedback

  • Thread starter Thread starter trinity_gt
  • Start date Start date Nov 22, 2004

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Nov 22, 2004
#1
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #1
As winter is setting in and my 02 GT is headed for storage, I find myself flipping through the pages of my 2004 FRPP parts catalog once again, hoping to find some reasonable goodies I can amass for installation next spring:

Anyone actually used and have any feedback on the following bits:

M-5500-A UCA kit
- bushings are twice as stiff as production for better lateral axle location; adverse effects for street car?

M-5230-M52 cat back
- sound? comparison to other catbacks?

M-5300-F springs with 460/570 170/310 rates F/R
- advertised 1.2" drop front, 1.0" drop rear; too much drop? too stiff? car sits like an F-150 now so there's room for a drop...

Car is a daily driver, not a drag racer and rarely sees the track though it does see quite a bit of WOT and on- & off-ramp charging
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Nov 22, 2004
#2
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #2
Out of your choices, I can only personally speak for the catback. Quality was better than stock, mandrel bent, no drone and improve sound quality. I didn't feel any hp increase however in the SOTP meter however and on the dyno.
I don't see much people with the "F" springs, but the "C"s are very popular here. What are the specs there on the F springs - progressive rated or specific? Oh yeah, with a 1.5" drop, you will need caster/camber plates that will allow you to get back into alignment. Max you typically can go is a 1.25" drop in front.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Nov 22, 2004
#3
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #3
LI98GTStang said:
Out of your choices, I can only personally speak for the catback. Quality was better than stock, mandrel bent, no drone and improve sound quality. I didn't feel any hp increase however in the SOTP meter however and on the dyno.
Click to expand...

That's to be expected I guess. I wouldn't have expected much in terms of HP from the cat back but I'm addicted to the sound improvement the MRT H gave and want a cat back - sans drone - to enhance that further.

I don't see much people with the "F" springs, but the "C"s are very popular here. What are the specs there on the F springs - progressive rated or specific? Oh yeah, with a 1.5" drop, you will need caster/camber plates that will allow you to get back into alignment. Max you typically can go is a 1.25" drop in front.
Click to expand...

Looking at the FRPP cat page:

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts/part_details.asp?PartKeyField=272

I see that the 'C' springs are probably more what I'm looking for in terms of drop. They spec a 1.125" drop for the front and 3/4" on the rear which seems pretty good. 650 lbs/in though?? Wow...that'd be a very stiff ride. Like...unbearably stiff on ice-heaved roads?
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Nov 22, 2004
#4
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #4
depends what you are going for. I didn't like the turn-in on the stock springs and wanted something stiffer, so I got the Bullitt spring kit. It has 650lbs in front, just like the Cs and I like the firmer ride, not too harsh IMO. At 460/570fr. and 170/310 rear, the Fs don't seem much firmer than stock, so if you like the stock ride, then it might be the way to go for you. FYI, stock specs. that I have are 400/500 fr. and 165/265 rear. Just don't forget about the c/c plates though.
 

john_324

New Member
Jan 14, 2003
446
1
0
Washington, D.C.
Nov 23, 2004
#5
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #5
Also consider the FRPP "B" springs...they lower the same as the Cs, but the ride is not as stiff (they're progressive not linear)...it's closer to stock from what I've heard (I have a set, but they're still waiting for installation).
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 23, 2004
#6
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #6
FRPP UCA bushings are twice as stiff as stock! A nice American thunder
Flowmaster (40series)Catback would sound great! A nice set of FRPP "C"
springs to lower the 4X4 stance!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Dirty Water Racing 89 Notch Project
  • ShedBuiltMS
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2021
Flyboy60
F
Progress Thread SN95 "Project Father & Son" 1994 GT
  • VibrantRedGT
  • Jun 25, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 11 12 13
Replies
259
Views
44K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 16, 2020
VibrantRedGT
Suspension New Suspension Changes
  • NicePony
  • Feb 4, 2013
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Feb 25, 2013
Roanstang
  • Locked
Expired Bunch of PARTS FOR SALE! Going Street car only
  • 1200gt
  • Feb 5, 2013
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
2K
Other Classifieds Feb 12, 2013
1200gt
Upr's S197 Handling Package
  • Sharad
  • Sep 26, 2012
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
4K
Vendor Sponsor Forums Sep 26, 2012
Sharad
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?