• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Fuel Injection vs Carba

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grand Poobah
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
G

Grand Poobah

New Member
Dec 27, 2009
18
0
0
Jan 21, 2010
#41
  • Jan 21, 2010
  • #41
wicked93gs said:
ITBs(individual throttle bodies, which use stacks) are still used on a lot of modern EFI engines...take a lot a suzuki GSXr....150HP out of 1000ccs...they are used to increase engine response...but mainly people do it because it looks cool...you could use a single plenum on top of the stacks and a shelby style air filter and lid
Click to expand...

Interesting. I'd imagine the stacks would have to be whittled down to size if you were to stick on an air filter on top.


Going back to another question I had, I was looking up Mass-Flo EFI online, and I was reading about how the guy promises the carb'd look and so forth with the nice aircleaners, but if that's the case, what is the function of the air cleaner?

Link to what I'm talking about.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 22, 2010
#42
  • Jan 22, 2010
  • #42
Grand Poobah said:
Interesting. I'd imagine the stacks would have to be whittled down to size if you were to stick on an air filter on top.


Going back to another question I had, I was looking up Mass-Flo EFI online, and I was reading about how the guy promises the carb'd look and so forth with the nice aircleaners, but if that's the case, what is the function of the air cleaner?
Click to expand...

...............................................
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Feb 3, 2010
#43
  • Feb 3, 2010
  • #43
While I respect EFI's ability to keep the engine in tune for a much wider range of operating conditions, and the resulting higher HP, TQ, and MPG, I like cars as a hobby. Hobbies are supposed to be fun, and frankly, EFI just isn't that fun. It's too "serious", IMHO, and cuts the simplistic appeal of classics which makes up half of why classics are a fun hobby in the first place. Plus the cost of O2 sensor, TPS, etc. replacement over, say, 100k miles (assuming you drive your classic, like I do), can eat into the fuel cost advantage over a carb setup.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel injection questions
  • limp
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
336
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2025
limp
S
Trying to decide if I should sell my 70 vert
  • Sixt9
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
157
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Sixt9
S
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
176
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
Fuel 87 5.0 Fuel rail lines
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 11, 2025
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?