• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Heads and cam for 93 cobra intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Truba055
  • Start date Start date Jul 29, 2018
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

Truba055

New Member
Jan 27, 2018
18
0
1
Jul 29, 2018
#1
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #1
My current setup on my 90 lx vert is a 93 cobra intake upper/lower, CAI, Mass air meter, 65mm TB, headers, cat back, 3.73s. I'm planning on upgrading the H-pipe and fuel system. It is just a cruiser, not a track car but I would like to add some more power. What would a good head/cam combo be? I can get a good deal on some used TFS 170s.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jul 29, 2018
#2
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #2
170s would be a good match, especially if you got that lower ported. But for the cost, upgrading the intake would give you better numbers, but then you could select a better head like the 190 11R TFS heads. So it really depends on what sort of combo you are putting together.

Myself? I'm doing a TFS170 based combo with tmoss ported explorer intake and likely a custom grind cam. Looking for street drivability for a cruiser, and not total peak HP
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
Jul 29, 2018
#3
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #3
The cobra will flow well enough for those 170s. I made 271/311 with TFS 170s, stage 1 cam, and cobra intake. It would be just fine for a cruiser. If you can spend a little more money you could have a custom ground cam that will give you stock cam drivability and make more power. Also most stangneters would recommend having TMOSS port the lower to get the most out of your combo.
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
Jul 29, 2018
#4
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #4
Mustang5L5 said:
170s would be a good match, especially if you got that lower ported. But for the cost, upgrading the intake would give you better numbers, but then you could select a better head like the 190 11R TFS heads. So it really depends on what sort of combo you are putting together.

Myself? I'm doing a TFS170 based combo with tmoss ported explorer intake and likely a custom grind cam. Looking for street drivability for a cruiser, and not total peak HP
Click to expand...

jinx
 
T

Truba055

New Member
Jan 27, 2018
18
0
1
Jul 29, 2018
#5
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #5
Thanks, my cobra lower is not ported but it is a "BD" series which already had larger runner outlets (thanks to tmoss for that info).
 
T

Truba055

New Member
Jan 27, 2018
18
0
1
Jul 29, 2018
#6
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #6
How was the tfs stage 1 cam for street?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jul 29, 2018
#7
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #7
Truba055 said:
How was the tfs stage 1 cam for street?
Click to expand...

I have one on my shelf. Prob won't run it. I've seen a lot of guys happy with it but I've also heard from many that it's a cam that likes RPM and comes alive over 3k rpm.
 
Reactions: deathb4dismount

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
Jul 29, 2018
#8
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #8
Mustang5L5 said:
I have one on my shelf. Prob won't run it. I've seen a lot of guys happy with it but I've also heard from many that it's a cam that likes RPM and comes alive over 3k rpm.
Click to expand...

It likes RPM and will pull till around 6k where the cobra intake (unless ported) will start wheezing and the car will fall on its face. Not great for a street environment unless you like turning that much RPM, which you will need, just to run down the ecoboost Ford Explorer that walked away from you at the red light. If your driving conditions allow you to turn that much RPM then it will put a smile on your face but you will be at the limit of the intake. You will definitely need 373s and I have been wondering if 410s would actually be better with that cam. You will definitely need a tune, and in my experience, if there are any issues with fuel or air, no matter how minor, you will experience drivability issues. I would strongly recommend going with a custom cam or keeping the stock cam with 1.7s which IMO would be more fun on the street.
 
T

Truba055

New Member
Jan 27, 2018
18
0
1
Jul 29, 2018
#9
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #9
The heads that I can get a good deal on come with 1.6s. Would it be worth the money to get 1.7s (with a stock cam) if it comes with 1.6s.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,935
10,575
203
polk county florida
Jul 29, 2018
#10
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #10
Truba055 said:
The heads that I can get a good deal on come with 1.6s. Would it be worth the money to get 1.7s (with a stock cam) if it comes with 1.6s.
Click to expand...
Yes.
 
Reactions: deathb4dismount

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jul 29, 2018
#11
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #11
Truba055 said:
The heads that I can get a good deal on come with 1.6s. Would it be worth the money to get 1.7s (with a stock cam) if it comes with 1.6s.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't turn away from a good deal over 1.6 vs 1.7s.

Honestly, custom grind cams aren't a whole lot. For the cost of hunting down 1.7s, put that towards a custom grind
 
Reactions: deathb4dismount

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,935
10,575
203
polk county florida
Jul 29, 2018
#12
  • Jul 29, 2018
  • #12
^^^^ this is also true^^^^^
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Jul 30, 2018
#13
  • Jul 30, 2018
  • #13
Cobra intake would work with any head setup because your not trying to get maximum power and et out of it.. It's a cruiser but I would go with at least the tw170's and have a custom cam made.

Stage 1 cam is a good cam i've had one for years in my daily driver and have one now in my other car. It has never given me a problem in either car. In both situations it was the cheapest route actually dirt cheap. Stop lights and idling never had stalling issues and above 3k it does pull like a train but the lower end could be lacking some grunt depending on the other parts of the equation like others mentioned.
 
T

Truba055

New Member
Jan 27, 2018
18
0
1
Jul 30, 2018
#14
  • Jul 30, 2018
  • #14
How about a simple alphabet cam like E303 with the tw170s
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
Jul 30, 2018
#15
  • Jul 30, 2018
  • #15
Truba055 said:
How about a simple alphabet cam like E303 with the tw170s
Click to expand...

no
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jul 30, 2018
#16
  • Jul 30, 2018
  • #16
Truba055 said:
How about a simple alphabet cam like E303 with the tw170s
Click to expand...


That's like a 25-year old hot blonde marrying a 65 year old guy. What a waste of a good time.
 
Last edited: Jul 30, 2018
T

Truba055

New Member
Jan 27, 2018
18
0
1
Jul 31, 2018
#17
  • Jul 31, 2018
  • #17
Ok based on some of the comments I'm thinking about looking for a different deal. LMR sells there SVE heads that get good reviews and are relatively inexpensive. I was thinking about them with a set of proform 1.7 roller rockers and keeping the stock cam for now. It sound like that may give me a good compromise of price, performance, and not kill my low end torque. Keeping in mind that this is just a cruiser and will never be a race car. Just looking for a little more performance and a better sound. Thoughts?
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Jul 31, 2018
#18
  • Jul 31, 2018
  • #18
TFS170s will crush the SVE heads in performance out of the box.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jul 31, 2018
#19
  • Jul 31, 2018
  • #19
Truba055 said:
Thoughts?
Click to expand...

I wouldn't put anything SVE on my car, but that's me personally.
 
Reactions: aztecgwynn

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Jul 31, 2018
#20
  • Jul 31, 2018
  • #20
SVE heads aren't bad but when compared to other heads especially the trickflows they aren't worth the time/money ripping the motor down to do.

If the engine had issues and I was low on money, sure I would toss the SVE heads on rather then deal with having the crappy e7 heads ran though and would save some weight a very slight increase in performance but otherwise no
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
738
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Heads/cam decision
  • RileyDymond
  • Oct 26, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
293
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 27, 2024
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?