• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadHandle8169
  • Start date Start date Apr 27, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#1
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #1
Do you think these would be a good purchase for me. I'm trying to do a build up and these heads look pretty good plus the location is like 20 min from my house so I wouldn't have to pay for shipping.

http://classifieds.stangnet.com/showproduct.php?product=17695&sort=1&cat=3&page=1

Also please nobody take them if I want them.
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#2
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #2
Also what other supporting parts are necessary with these heads? Basically would I just be able to bolt them up along with my Edelbrock Intake I'm going to install and just run them? Can I do this until I get funds for the TB and MAM?

Also what kind of numbers would I be looking at in the 1/4 and HP and TQ wise with these heads an Edelbrock Performer Intake Manifold and the mods in my sig. Thanks
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 27, 2005
#3
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #3
You may need longer pushrods. You won't know for sure till you bolt them on. As for if they are a good buy I don't know. If you are going the super charger route then cast iron heads are great. If staying NA then I would wait to get aluminum to save the weight.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Apr 27, 2005
#4
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #4
I would go aluminum either way. To me i would pass.

For $400 I would consider it if I was planning to go the H/C/I route.

Chris
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#5
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #5
There is no way to tell this before and any incite on HP?
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Apr 27, 2005
#6
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #6
MadHandle8169 said:
There is no way to tell this before and any incite on HP?
Click to expand...


Pro's can say, or maybe even guys who already run it. But it depends on which cam u run and other things inorder to get the geometry setup right. It takes 5 minutes to check once u have the heads on the block to see what push rods you need.

HP? I would just throw a guess out there and say in the 260rwhp range MAYBE? I am clueless on the gt40 combos...but there are guys making nice power and great times with them. Do u plan on running the stock cam?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 27, 2005
#7
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #7
You may need to have a valve job done on them. If so that would be a bit more money you would have in them.

Somewhere on these sites I've seen the older Aluminum GT40 take off heads for I wanna say something like $699.

I'm with Chris .... Don't sink too much money in em.

Later
Grady
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#8
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #8
Well for right now I was planning on running the stock cam. Would this be a bad idea, is an aftermarket cam needed. I would have money for heads and probably the Throttle Body and Mass Air. Then after that I was hoping to run it a while like that until I accumulated funds for other stuff. So what other stuff would be needed? If it's a lot I would probably just wait on heads and do gears and some other stuff first. But, I figured since he is so close to me and if it's a good deal I should take it.
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#9
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #9
Would something like this be worth spending the few extra bucks?
http://www.buyfordracing.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=518
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 27, 2005
#10
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #10
MadHandle8169 said:
Would something like this be worth spending the few extra bucks?
http://www.buyfordracing.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=518
Click to expand...

Those are the heads I was telling you about.

They should not need a valve job, lol.

OTOH, you don't get rr's with them. You could reuse your stockers on them.

I believe the performance will be close between those and the iron GT40's.

Later
Grady
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#11
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #11
And then the Aluminum ones are lighter so overall they are better than the cast iron. Also would I be able to just run around on those heads with an Edelbrock Intake Manifold and the stock TB, MAM, Cam and Injectors or is that a bad idea. If so what kind of HP and TQ am I looking at with the mods in my sig.

Also since I'm on a budget right now it's either Gears or those Aluminum Y303 Heads.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 27, 2005
#12
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #12
I have those exact heads on my car and just put them on about a month ago. I am running the stock rockers but I think I may need to get I slightly longer set of pushrods. My car is making a ticking noise that I think is noisy valvetrain. I believe the stock ones are 6.272". Summit has 6.300" pushrods by TrickFlow that are $85. So, make this a consideration. Gears are a good mod but won't make your car quicker @ your current list of mods you are planning, just more fun to drive.

EDIT: You'll also want the shim kit to adjust the bolt down(stock) style rockers.$10 from Summit.
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#13
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #13
So what else besides new gaskets, pushrods, and the shim kits is needed?
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 27, 2005
#14
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #14
A head bolt kit FRPP #M-6065-D289 (ARP with stepped washers). Water/coolant, RTV red (just a little), anti-seize (for all bolts that go into the aluminum including the spark plugs). New spark plugs (Autolite 3924). I went with a complete engine gasket set FRPP #M-6003-A50. The shim kit for the rockers FRPP #M-6529-A302.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 27, 2005
#15
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #15
<----Check out my Garage<----

For some pics.
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#16
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #16
But other than that you have the stock MAM, TB, Cam and Injectors and you don't have any problems?
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#17
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #17
I just checked out the pics. The car is looking good. My favorite is of the garage with all the parts though.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 27, 2005
#18
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #18
Yes, except for what is listed in my sig everything else is stock. My theory on the ticking noise from the valvetrain is this: the stock E7s are 58cc and the Y303s are 64cc. This leads me to believe that the pedestals that the rockers bolt down to are slightly higher than stock. This is probalbly why the stock pushrods are now too short. I have no problems at all. Idle is great. I did feel a little less pull down in the lower rpm range put I got more pull up top. Even with 2.73s in the rear I had no problems burning the tires through third gear so I don't think it'll hurt your performance much. I have 3.73s so I have no issues here.
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Apr 27, 2005
#19
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #19
Damn! I was contemplating just getting gears and installing the intake and be done with the car for a while. But, now since I'm going to be in the motor already I can just install the heads and the intake and make a lot more power. If I do this approach I can just get better supporting parts and build the car up right because it is easier to gather like 200 bucks for the Throttle Body or MAM later down the line. Decisions, Decisions, Decisions!
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Apr 27, 2005
#20
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #20
Well, the camshaft is just a few more bolts away. Might as well save a couple $$$ for it as well

I kinda doing an experiment. Most people start out with the intake and then do heads and cam later. Well, I got these heads for a good deal so I bolted them on first. Then, I will do a cam followed by the intake most likely. Don't know for sure. A lot depends on expendable cash at the right time. I also need a mid pipe (H or X). I think I will go with the UPR catted X. I also wanted to run the new BBK SSI intake but it won't clear the stock hood
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
640
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
For Sale Maximum Motorsports MMTR-2 Bumpsteer Kit - 1979 - 1993 Mustang
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 18, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
500
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
406
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?