• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

HELP: '87 runs super rich and dies if it idles lower then 1,900 rpms

  • Thread starter Thread starter 87fromMI
  • Start date Start date Mar 24, 2011
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 24, 2011
#1
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #1
I just got the car. It runs so rich that it will burn your eyes and will thin the oil. It has had a scan tool hooked up to it and wouldn't show any codes. the car could possibly have a cam. I does have M.A.C. equal length headers with duels and a H pipe, it has not cats, but O2 sensors. other than that its stock. The car hasn't moved a mile in almost 2 years. I just plugged the computer back in yesterday and ran it at a 2,000 rpm for a couple minutes. if it got below 1,800 rpms it would die. this car runs extremely rich.

Anyone have some idea of where i should start. this car has already stumped 2 other owners. I really don't want to put a carb on it, but if I can find out whats wrong with the fuel injection, I will so I can drive it this spring and summer.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Mar 24, 2011
#2
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #2
Check this out:

Help me create the "Surging Idle Checklist" - Mustang Forums at StangNet

Some helpful ideas in there. I had a problem with mine running rich and not idling very well. As it turns out I had a pretty massive vacuum leak.
 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 24, 2011
#3
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #3
thanks. i was inside the car while it was running so i could keep it from stalling, my dad said he heard a vacuum leak. the exhaust leaks because where the header and exhaust pipe come together isnt tight. when i tighten it tomorrow I'll have him listen again.

thanks
 

BlackGT89

Member
Dec 16, 2002
774
8
18
Huntsville, AL
Mar 24, 2011
#4
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #4
Pull the vacuum line off of the fuel pressure regulator and check to see if the line has gasoline in it. If so you need a new fuel pressure regulator.

There are some vacuum lines hidden under the upper intake, you might have to pull the upper intake to see them (not hard to do). If you remove the upper you might as well replace the lines while you are at it.
 

Wildstringer

New Member
Feb 20, 2011
65
0
0
Mar 25, 2011
#5
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #5
check the vacuum line to the map sensor. after 2 years you could have stuck sensors or wires that have been chewed on.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Mar 25, 2011
#6
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #6
BlackGT89 said:
Pull the vacuum line off of the fuel pressure regulator and check to see if the line has gasoline in it. If so you need a new fuel pressure regulator.

There are some vacuum lines hidden under the upper intake, you might have to pull the upper intake to see them (not hard to do). If you remove the upper you might as well replace the lines while you are at it.
Click to expand...

Very good advice, do it first.


You got no codes or an 11? The 11 indicates that the computer passed it's internal diadnostics and can dump codes. No code 11 and you have computer or wiring problems.
 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 25, 2011
#7
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #7
its had other computers in it to see if thats the problem. Also It was just switched to mass air and it ran even worse, so it when back to speed density.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Mar 25, 2011
#8
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #8
87fromMI said:
its had other computers in it to see if thats the problem. Also It was just switched to mass air and it ran even worse, so it when back to speed density.
Click to expand...

You have not answered my question. In order for me to narrow down the list of possible problems, I need good answers. Without them there is very little I can do to try and help you. Please answer: did you get a code 11 or not?
 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 25, 2011
#9
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #9
I was not the one who did the scan the guy that i got it from on a trade did. he works at fords and he had their tech at ford hook up the scan tool to it. he told me that the scan came up with not 1 code. the scan did not show any codes at all.

I just tried to see if I could get some codes by using a paper clip and a test light and it didnt do anything.
 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 25, 2011
#10
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #10
I just talked to the guy who had the car before me, and he said that they were thinking that it was a electrical problem too.

He said they tried to run a self test where the tool elevates the rms and what not. It would not run a self check, it was unresponsive.

Also he replaced the fuel pressure regulator, map sensor, and he wen through the whole thing and fixed all the vacuum leaks, he took the upper intake off to put all the lines back together. he use a vacuum gauge to test it and it was good. The ford tech and the guy I got it from both thought it was electical because of the unresponsiveness of the car.

Anyone got Ideas of how to prove if the electrical system is damaged.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Mar 25, 2011
#11
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #11
Computer will not go into diagnostic mode on 86-90 model 5.0 Mustangs

Disconnect the battery positive terminal before making any resistance checks.
The voltage drop in the ground cable will cause incorrect resistance readings.


How it is supposed to work:
The black/white wire (pin 46) is signal ground for the computer. It provides a dedicated
ground for the EGR, Baro, ACT, ECT, & TPS sensors as well as the ground to put the
computer into self test mode. If this ground is bad, none of the sensors mentioned will work
properly. That will severely affect the car's performance. You will have hard starting, low power
and drivability problems.
Since it is a dedicated ground, it passes through the computer on its
way to the computer main power ground that terminates at the battery pigtail ground. It should
read less than 1.5 ohms when measured from anyplace on the engine harness with the battery
pigtail ground as the other reference point for the ohmmeter probe.

What sometimes happens is that the test connector black/white wire gets jumpered to power
which either burns up the wiring or burns the trace off the pc board inside the computer.
That trace connects pins 46 to pins 40 & 60. Only an experienced electronics technician can open
the computer up & repair the trace if it burns up and creates an open circuit.

The STI (Self Test Input ) is jumpered to ground to put the computer into test mode. Jumpering
it to power can produce unknown results, including damage to the computer. The ohm test
simply verifies that there are no breaks in the wiring between the test connector and the computer input.

How to test the wiring :
With the power off, measure the resistance between the computer test ground
(black/white wire) on the self test connector and battery ground. You should see less than
1.5 ohms.



If that check fails, remove the passenger side kick panel and disconnect the computer
connector. There is a 10 MM bolt that holds it in place. Measure the resistance between
the black/white wire and pin 46 on the computer wiring connector: it should be less than
1.5 ohms. More that 1.5 ohms is a wiring problem. If it reads 1.5 ohms or less, then the
computer is suspect. On the computer, measure the resistance between pin 46 and pins
40 & 60: it should be less than 1.5 ohms. More that that and the computer’s internal
ground has failed, and the computer needs to be replaced.

See http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/749974-computer-issue.html#post7490537 for Joel5.0’s fix for the computer internal signal ground.

If the first ground check was good, there are other wires to check. Measure the
resistance between the STI computer self test connector (red/white wire) and pin 48 on
the computer main connector: it should be less than 1.5 ohms. More that 1.5 ohms is a
wiring problem

The following is a view from the computer side of the computer wiring connector.


Diagram courtesy of Tmoss & Stang&2birds

Check out the diagram and notice all the places the black/white wire goes. Almost every
sensor on the engine except the MAF is connected to it.


See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds
(website host) for help on 88-95 wiring Mustang FAQ - Wiring & Engine Info

 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 25, 2011
#12
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #12
while i was looking at the wiring diagram, I looked at the black/white 46. The first thing it passes through is the neutral gear switch. mine is broken. they just took a piece of speaker wire and jumped the starter solenoid and connected it to a push button to start it, its kinda rigged up but works. if that switch doesn't work, will it inhibit the flow of electricity through the system. the car doesn't start by turning the key. you have to turn the key to give everything power then hit the button to turn the motor over, if the car isn't in neutral or the clutch isn't pushed in and you hit the button the car will role forward because of the starter.
 

BlackGT89

Member
Dec 16, 2002
774
8
18
Huntsville, AL
Mar 25, 2011
#13
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #13
I agree with jrichker completely, bad grounds can wreak havoc with these cars. I would take them all apart and clean them down to shiny metal ! Also look for any grounds that might be missing.

Next I would check for any stuck injectors. It's not common on these cars but it happens and could be pouring gas down the intake. Check out this thread in order to do that. http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/786225-86-5-0-injectors-not-opening.html

Check to make sure you have the proper injectors. http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/799352-injector-identification.html

If the computer and other parts have been swapped around I would attempt to varify that you have the proper computer for your application. This link might help with that. Your Mustang's Computer Code (1987-2011+) - The Basics at AmericanMuscle.com

In your case I would be tempted to start over with mass air parts and make sure you have the proper computer to match. If you have speed density and you already have a cam in the car, that could be part of your problem. From what I've heard not all cams are speed density friendly.
 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 26, 2011
#14
  • Mar 26, 2011
  • #14
thank everyone for your help so far. I've learned a lot. the computers that were tried in the car were both out of '87s with 5 speeds. both computers made the car run the same.
 
8

87fromMI

New Member
Mar 23, 2011
15
0
0
Mar 28, 2011
#15
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #15
jrichker I tested the resistance and I got .3-.5 consistently. There has been 2 or 3 different computers in this car and they all made the car run the same. Except the mass air computer when it was swapped, it ran worst and is now back to speed density. So I find it hard to think theres something wrong with the computer.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Mar 28, 2011
#16
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #16
The mass air computer swap reqires the installation of a Mass air harness pigtail and moving of several pins in the computer harness. Did you add in the mass air harness pigtail or swap the entire harness out for an 89 or later 5.0 Mustang?

See MASS air conversion instructions from Mustang Mass Air Conversion « for more details.

On the computer, measure the resistance between pin 46 and pins 40 & 60: it should be less than 1.5 ohms. More that that and the computer’s internal ground has failed, and the computer needs to be replaced.
 

ID89GT

10 Year Member
May 26, 2008
1,659
18
49
Spokane Valley, WA
May 24, 2011
#17
  • May 24, 2011
  • #17
You say there is an exhaust leak.. is that before or after the 02 sensors?
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
May 24, 2011
#18
  • May 24, 2011
  • #18
Are you sure the computer is not bad? My car could never pull codes, couldnt even get the check engine light to come on. I took my computer out and there were broken capacitors inside. You may want to at least open it and inspect it. Dont try to clean it or anything. You say you just plugged the computer back in, did you have it stored somewhere it may have been damaged?
 
S

straws

New Member
Dec 29, 2005
21
0
1
May 30, 2011
#19
  • May 30, 2011
  • #19
The car does sound like a hack job, and the prior owner (PO) sounded dumb.

I am an ASE master tech, and from the sounds of this I would not touch it. For you to take someone's word (PO) who probably did half of the hack job, when they say a Ford technician looked at it...is probably half true. The tech probably tried to run a scan only, but once they realized all the wiring snafus, they ran away saying they couldn't help.

Your posts really sound like you can turn a wrench, but not own a meter or gauge of any type.

How about this: Next time post some pictures of your areas of concerns, tell the whole story...no matter how long it takes. As for this post, I would not assist with the intentional butchering of a car.

I usually try to buy cars where people have mildly butchered them, because I can get them for a couple hundred bucks, fix for $10 bucks, then sell for a couple thousand.

Good luck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
'04 V6 running rich excessively on both banks
  • 04DSGVert
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
353
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Oct 27, 2025
04DSGVert
0
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
846
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
244
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
149
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
T
Fuel Running Rich, White smoke
  • Tas_Jak
  • Jun 1, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 15, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?