• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Help identify my transmission??

  • Thread starter Thread starter NOLA_SVT
  • Start date Start date Nov 12, 2008
N

NOLA_SVT

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
7
0
0
Nov 12, 2008
#1
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #1
Can someone help me identify this transmission... apparently my car started life as an auto...

 

Attachments

  • IMG_3093.webp
    56.3 KB · Views: 816

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 12, 2008
#2
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #2
It's a Tremec 3550 or Tremec TKO. The 3550 has a 10 spline input shaft and a 28 spline output shaft. The TKO will have a 26 spline input shaft and a 31 spline output shaft. It may also be a TKO-500/TKO-600, which is the newer model of the 3550 series. I don't know the specifics on the newer models off the top of my head. Good transmission to have either way. TTC claims much higher torque ratings for the TKO-500/TKO-600 series transmissions, But I've rebuild both the 3550 series and a TKO-600, and they are virtually identical inside.


Kurt
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Nov 12, 2008
#3
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #3
Looks like a TKO-500: Tremec TKO-500 Transmission - Ford Mustang
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Nov 12, 2008
#4
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #4
Definately a Tremec, probably a 3550.
 
N

NOLA_SVT

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
7
0
0
Nov 13, 2008
#5
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #5
well kind of confirming what I had a hunch of but the reason I'm asking is because I need a new transmission mount... someone gave me a t-5 mount and said "it has to be a t5" but when I went to bolt it up it was too wide where it bolts to the tranny.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 13, 2008
#6
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #6
I would be stoked. A 3550 is like a $1300 transmission new. That transmission is infinately stronger than a T-5.

Kurt
 
N

NOLA_SVT

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
7
0
0
Nov 13, 2008
#7
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #7
oh i am happy that its not the t5, i just don't know what mount to use
 
R

RumbleFox

New Member
Nov 12, 2008
15
0
0
Nov 15, 2008
#8
  • Nov 15, 2008
  • #8
Def. not a 3550.

I'm positive its a TKO-500
 
R

RumbleFox

New Member
Nov 12, 2008
15
0
0
Nov 15, 2008
#9
  • Nov 15, 2008
  • #9
revhead347 said:
I would be stoked. A 3550 is like a $1300 transmission new. That transmission is infinately stronger than a T-5.

Kurt
Click to expand...

I wouldn't be, if you're plannin' on puttin down any kind of REAL power, 3550's are garbage

Not to mention, you can bolster the f**k out of even a BW T5 with the right parts. (billet thrust plate, steel bearing retainer, hardened input shaft, steel forks, etc.)
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 15, 2008
#10
  • Nov 15, 2008
  • #10
RumbleFox said:
I wouldn't be, if you're plannin' on puttin down any kind of REAL power, 3550's are garbage

Not to mention, you can bolster the f**k out of even a BW T5 with the right parts. (billet thrust plate, steel bearing retainer, hardened input shaft, steel forks, etc.)
Click to expand...

Tell that to my 3550. 8 years of 11 second passes, and 635 ft lbs of torque to the wheels. After 7 years I broke the input shaft and updated it to a TKO input shaft. And I chipped a tooth off a third gear. Other than that, it's been great. There aren't too many T-5s that will stand up to that.

Kurt
 
Reactions: shroomhauler

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Nov 17, 2008
#11
  • Nov 17, 2008
  • #11
Is there a part# on the thing you can ask someone at Tremec about?

I said a 3550, b/c the pick I saw of a TKO 500 had a slightly different looking shifter mounting plate/piont.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 17, 2008
#12
  • Nov 17, 2008
  • #12
Shifter mounting points are the same. That looks like a stock 3550 shifter to me, which isn't a very good shifter. I think the TKO-500 actually comes with a better shifter.

Kurt
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,855
26
69
Dallas, Texas
Nov 18, 2008
#13
  • Nov 18, 2008
  • #13
Nice "freebie".

I think they are a lot better then t5s hands down. Friend of mine power shifted his (if that is a 3550) stock one for a long time which is something I wouldn't dream of trying with a t5.
 

divit250r

Member
Mar 31, 2005
314
0
16
Columbia City, IN
Nov 19, 2008
#14
  • Nov 19, 2008
  • #14
Labora said:
Nice "freebie".

I think they are a lot better then t5s hands down. Friend of mine power shifted his (if that is a 3550) stock one for a long time which is something I wouldn't dream of trying with a t5.
Click to expand...

This is the problem with generalizations, I've been beating the tar out of my T5 since I got the car in 2000, haven't had an issue yet. If not for power shifting, my car would probably be a 13.5 ride. And not nearly as fun.

Scott
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 19, 2008
#15
  • Nov 19, 2008
  • #15
It is physically impossible to power shift an unmodified T-5 or 3550. You have to let off the throttle or push in the clutch, one or the other. If you are able to shift the transmission with the throttle to the floor without pushing in the clutch the lock rings are seriously damaged. The 3550 is quite a bit better than the stock T-5. I wouldn't want to try to run an 11 second quarter mile in my heavy arse sled with a T-5.

Kurt
 

divit250r

Member
Mar 31, 2005
314
0
16
Columbia City, IN
Nov 20, 2008
#16
  • Nov 20, 2008
  • #16
revhead347 said:
It is physically impossible to power shift an unmodified T-5 or 3550. You have to let off the throttle or push in the clutch, one or the other. If you are able to shift the transmission with the throttle to the floor without pushing in the clutch the lock rings are seriously damaged. The 3550 is quite a bit better than the stock T-5. I wouldn't want to try to run an 11 second quarter mile in my heavy arse sled with a T-5.

Kurt
Click to expand...

What you're referring to is beyond what I'd call powershifting. I'm talking about never letting off the skinny pedal while you shift, but using the clutch. The trans would have to have a dog-ring style synchro to allow you to shift without using the clutch under power. Maybe I missed the boat with my definition of powershifting, but I can tell you that I've been doing it since the summer of '01 when I put my MSD on.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 20, 2008
#17
  • Nov 20, 2008
  • #17
Well poop, I used to do that in my Escort. I do that in my Mustang with the nitrous on. I've talked to the people at Liberty gear several times about having my 3550 faceplated. They say even if you do have a dog-tooth engagement system, the transmission itself is not strong enough for power shifting. You can powershift it, but it's going to break something in the tranny.

Kurt
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Nov 20, 2008
#18
  • Nov 20, 2008
  • #18
its a 3550, the tko 500/600 had different shifter plate.

the 3550 has the front two closer inward and on the tko 500/600 all the bolts are inline
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Fox 1993 2.3L LX headlight harness
  • RubyRedNotch
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
74
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2026
AeroCoupe
Help Identifying Engine Harness Plug
  • FoxbodyRob
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
248
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Feb 7, 2026
FoxbodyRob
C
Fox 1993 LX 2.3 Wiring
  • Coyoteswap93
  • Jul 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
184
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2026
AeroCoupe
T5 identification
  • 3054tony
  • May 16, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
584
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
142
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?