• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help Me with Injector Size

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lifted94XLT
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
May 5, 2009
#1
  • May 5, 2009
  • #1
Hey guys. whats the best way to figure and calculate what injector size I'll need?? I can give motor specs if needed....

Thanks
---Ryan
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
May 6, 2009
#2
  • May 6, 2009
  • #2
Search!

Injector HP ratings: divide flow rating by.5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
385 HP x .85 = 326 HP
480 HP x .85 = 408 HP
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 6, 2009
#3
  • May 6, 2009
  • #3
You need to also consider the BSFC (Brake Specific Fuel Consumption ) as well. Injectors one might use to feed a particular horsepower level in a N/A application wouldn't be the same injectors one would use for the same horsepower level on a forced induction application. I would never trust a set of 30lb/hr injectors to suply enough fuel to feed a 400hp engine with forced induction.

Here's a handy guide to help you make your selection. http://z31.com/software/injector.pl
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
May 6, 2009
#4
  • May 6, 2009
  • #4
Don't forget that the BSFC will vary depending on how efficient the engine is. I'd use the following figures as a guide:

Bone stock 5.0: BSFC 0.51
Full basic bolt-on 5.0, stock H/C/I: BSFC 0.48
Mild H/C/I 5.0: BSFC 0.45
Higher HP H/C/I 5.0: BSFC 0.42

Using the 85% maximum recommended duty cycle and stock 39psi fuel pressure:

19lb injectors are good for up to 270hp (full basic bolt-on 5.0).
24lb injectors are good for up to 390hp (higher HP H/C/I 5.0).

You could increase the fuel pressure with an adjustable regulator to raise the HP threshold but there's a limit to how far you can go without risking the injectors sticking open.
e.g. Ford Racing 340hp crate combo (GT40X heads, E303 cam, Cobra intake). Assuming a BSFC of 0.45 (Mild H/C/I), stock 19lb injectors would be at 100% duty cycle at stock fuel pressure. Even if you raise the fuel pressure to 50psi, the injector duty cycle would still be too high at 88%. If you use 24lb injectors at stock fuel pressure, the duty cycle will be a comfortable 80%.

If you're likely to err with the injector size, it's better to err on them being a little too big rather than too small. As long as the MAF is calibrated for the correct injector size and the O2 sensors are functioning properly, the engine computer's adaptive learning memory will ensure that the A/F mixture is close to optimum under all conditions.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 6, 2009
#5
  • May 6, 2009
  • #5
Just tell us what your engine setup is and we will tell you what to use.
No reason to over complicate something so simple
 

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
May 6, 2009
#6
  • May 6, 2009
  • #6
2000xp8 said:
Just tell us what your engine setup is and we will tell you what to use.
No reason to over complicate something so simple
Click to expand...

Sounds good, I'm slow when it comes to calculations::
Stock bore 302, Factory Crank and rods with Forged Aluminum Pistons (factory dish), Ported E6 heads, X303, 1.6 alum roller rockers, Gt40 intake, 70mm TB, bigger MAF (haven't bought yet obvisouly), and I'll be running a wet kit.... I'm assuming somewhere close to 100shot. I also have an Aeromotive Adj Fuel Press Reg so I can play with my pressure. I had it set to 42psi before motor went down for rebuild.... I think I've got everything in there.
Thanks for the help guys.
--Ryan
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 6, 2009
#7
  • May 6, 2009
  • #7
Lifted94XLT said:
Sounds good, I'm slow when it comes to calculations::
Stock bore 302, Factory Crank and rods with Forged Aluminum Pistons (factory dish), Ported E6 heads, X303, 1.6 alum roller rockers, Gt40 intake, 70mm TB, bigger MAF (haven't bought yet obvisouly), and I'll be running a wet kit.... I'm assuming somewhere close to 100shot. I also have an Aeromotive Adj Fuel Press Reg so I can play with my pressure. I had it set to 42psi before motor went down for rebuild.... I think I've got everything in there.
Thanks for the help guys.
--Ryan
Click to expand...

You'll probably want 24 or 30lb/hr injectors for that build.

Keep in mind that a "wet" nitrous kit supplies its own fuel, so the engine's injector sizing doesn't need to be influenced by how much nitrous is added.

I don't know what your plans are for a fuel pump, but you're going to need something in the 190LPH range (but going bigger doesn't hurt). Fuel pump sizing IS influenced by the added nitrous system.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
May 6, 2009
#8
  • May 6, 2009
  • #8
Assuming you have a headers-back exhaust, your 302 will be putting out roughly 320-325 flywheel HP (all motor) so you'll need 24lb injectors.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 6, 2009
#9
  • May 6, 2009
  • #9
Bullitt95 said:
Assuming you have a headers-back exhaust, your 302 will be putting out roughly 320-325 flywheel HP (all motor) so you'll need 24lb injectors.
Click to expand...

I think you're probably being way generous (about 40-50hp) in your estimates. Remember, he's still pushing this all through stock iron heads....and a set of non-HO E6 castings on top of that. Ported or not, he can have all the suporting parts in the world, but with a cork like that in the system, he's never going to break 300hp in N/A form.

I'd say the 19lb/hr injectors will probably do him for now until he decides to upgrade those heads.
 

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
May 6, 2009
#10
  • May 6, 2009
  • #10
I will be running a Walbro 255lph fuel pump.

I am running long tubes with header mufflers for now for exhaust

the E6s weren't my first choice, but I bought them with all the machince work done to that to support my cam selection, and from the reading and research I did on them, I was lead to understand that they are not that great of heads in stock form, but if the exhaust side was opened up that they flowed REALLY well, which these have been..... I will eventually run a set of TF heads or AFRs, but I couldn't justify spending half my motor and suspension budget just on heads..... the car has been down for about 8 months now and I'm gettin itchy. haha.

Thanks for all your help guys..... I will probably run the 19s for now and in a few months buy a set of 24s.... I'm not worried about making crazy power right now (although I'd like to). this is my first motor build and I understand the saying that "there will always be somebody faster"..... Thanks for your help again.

--Ryan
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 6, 2009
#11
  • May 6, 2009
  • #11
The problem with the E6 heads isn't their intake and exhaust runner ability to flow air (well, it is in stock trim, but that can be improved with porting). The issue with the heads is that their closed chamber combustion design really shrouds airflow around the valves, impeding over all flow potential. They're great for building low end torque, but fall on their face pretty early in the power band. Don’t be surprised even with the X303 cam if these things hit a wall at about 4,800RPM. When I said they were a serious cork in your combination, I wasn’t exagerating.

Not bagging on you, just giving you an FYI.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 6, 2009
#12
  • May 6, 2009
  • #12
Ya, the 19's sound right.
 

BLOWN347STROKER

Member
Jan 13, 2009
237
0
16
topeka kansas
May 6, 2009
#13
  • May 6, 2009
  • #13
I would go with the 24 lb injectors. They are easy enough to be tuned. Plus you can pick them up pretty cheap. It will also help you out if you decide to do some more mods. The 24s will last you for a while even if you start upgrading engine components.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 6, 2009
#14
  • May 6, 2009
  • #14
You size injectors for use now, not later.
 

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
May 6, 2009
#15
  • May 6, 2009
  • #15
so would I be better off just running factory e7's machined to run dual springs..... you guys got me worried about these e6s now. the X-cam doesn't ever build power til like 2200, and if I'm gonna hit a wall at 4, then whats the point?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 6, 2009
#16
  • May 6, 2009
  • #16
If money is tight, i'd look for some gt40 irons and slap them on.
IMO get the cobra style heads, not the P's, so you don't need to blow 200 bucks on headers.
Heads should be around $350 or so
The E6's are pretty useless, and the E7's aren't far behind.
 

Lifted94XLT

Member
Jun 25, 2008
139
1
16
Shawnee, KS
May 6, 2009
#17
  • May 6, 2009
  • #17
Money is tight, but I can get it if I need it, and after readin y'alls replies, I started lookin into the AFR 165s and the TFTW heads... You think they would be a good head for my setup?? I just spent the money on the forged alum pistons and don't wanna have to send them back and spend more for bigger notched pistons if I don't have to, but I still wanna make this $3k build worth the time and effort on the fun-o-meter. I'm aiming for mid to low 11s on spray

--Ryan
 
B

billy86gt

New Member
May 4, 2009
5
0
0
Maryland
May 6, 2009
#18
  • May 6, 2009
  • #18
if i was you i would go with a set of brodix heads.for the money your gonna spend on afr's or the tftw heads the brodix heads are much better and come with alot better valve train than the other 2 come with. it would be better to spend the extra couple hundred to go with the better heads. I mean after all the head and cam package are the eart and soul of any build.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 6, 2009
#19
  • May 6, 2009
  • #19
Lifted94XLT said:
Money is tight, but I can get it if I need it, and after readin y'alls replies, I started lookin into the AFR 165s and the TFTW heads... You think they would be a good head for my setup?? I just spent the money on the forged alum pistons and don't wanna have to send them back and spend more for bigger notched pistons if I don't have to, but I still wanna make this $3k build worth the time and effort on the fun-o-meter. I'm aiming for mid to low 11s on spray

--Ryan
Click to expand...

Well, using tw's or afr's would certainly be worth alot of power, probably another 50rwhp than what you were previously setting up.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 6, 2009
#20
  • May 6, 2009
  • #20
Are your current pistons notched? I might look into the AFR's over the TFS heads, since the valves on the Twist Wedge heads will be canted and may not line up with the notches in the pistons. The X303 is a pretty radical cam, so the only way to know for certain would be to test fit the heads with it.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
661
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Drivetrain 6R80 to t56 swap
  • Holymoses
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
187
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Contour fan CFM
  • Mustang5L5
  • Apr 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
382
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 22, 2026
qikgts
S
Fuel rail help
  • stang9150
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
stang9150
S
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
298
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 21, 2026
X-cam34
X
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?