• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

HOLY gas mileage batman

  • Thread starter Thread starter whyask
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

tiptone

Member
May 1, 2007
37
0
6
Sep 10, 2007
#21
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #21
DaNd4Speed said:
Mind me asking how you accomplish this? Downhill for 50 miles in Neutral with a tailwind? Secret reserve tank somewhere? You have to be running the tank to damn near last drop before filling up!
Click to expand...

Well, minus the blower, I achieve it by driving 60 miles a day, five days a week on the highway at 75-85. I do very little city driving and I usually fill up around 320 miles with a gallon or more still in the tank.
 

streethorse

15 Year Member
Oct 8, 2005
1,042
6
58
Dallas Texas
Sep 10, 2007
#22
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #22
Its kind of hard to know just how far past E you can go without running
out of gas. Miles per tank is really inaccurate, call me crazy but I always
go with the miles per gallon calculation......
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Sep 10, 2007
#23
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #23
a good tune helps too
 

DaNd4Speed

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
180
0
0
Patterson, NY
Sep 10, 2007
#24
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #24
Well I guess a fair assesment on miles per tank is to understand how empty one runs their tank. I'm filling up around 190-200 miles per tank, but I've never run the tank to the low fuel light to light up. I'm usually filling anywhere between 11-12 gallons to fill up, so that's roughly 16-17 mpg.

I believe our tanks are 15 gallons, correct? So I guess I could achieve 250 miles to a tank running it completely dry. But driving a blown car on an empty tank is a no-no because of the risk of picking up sediment in the tank, or even the risk of running out of gas on a WOT run.
 

96GTstang46

New Member
Nov 20, 2006
142
0
0
Seattle, Washington
Sep 10, 2007
#25
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #25
OK so iam going to tell everyone this because it seems like some (not all) people dont know how to do math, so i will break it down for you... this is how i see gas prices..

IN the Seattle area
87----$2.75
89----$2.86
92----$2.92

Now, we all have around 15 gallon gas tanks so we will base it off that.

15x 2.75= $41.25 for a tank of 87..

15x 2.92= $43.80 for a tank of 92..

SO when people complain about how much 92 is over 87 it is so dumb to me when you cant pay an extra $2.55 more for a WHOLE TANK of gas and then complain some more about the price of gas???????

Sorry i had to get that out, and iam not trying to be a know it all or a Doushbag or anything.. just trying to open peoples eyes...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Sep 10, 2007
#26
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #26
281CI96Coupe said:
Ugh, 87 octane will do more harm then good, go premium and dont look bad.
Click to expand...


Stock 2v's are tuned for 87 octane. There is more power to have at lower octanes


No reason to step up unless you have a power adder, bumped compression or changing the fuel/timing curves via a tune.

Octane doesn't make power in itself.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Sep 10, 2007
#27
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #27
Twista said:
I thought the newer GT's (99+) require a higher grade than 87? I know the slow 96-98's use 87. My friends stock 01 GT runs on 91 octane.
Click to expand...


Nope, 87 all the way to 2004. Don't know what the 2005+ GT's take.



I've gotten 325 miles per tank, but that was mostly highway driving with some stop and go traffic and the a/c on occasionally. Most of the time i was in 4th or 5th gear. That was on 87 octane
 

goshia

New Member
Jul 1, 2005
252
0
0
Mead, Colorado
Sep 11, 2007
#28
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #28
DaNd4Speed said:
Mind me asking how you accomplish this? Downhill for 50 miles in Neutral with a tailwind? Secret reserve tank somewhere? You have to be running the tank to damn near last drop before filling up!
Click to expand...

I have a managed a very important mode that most look over. Mikronite my friends on the gear and pinion.

I have my car up on the rack right now tearing into the rear end and rebuilding it. Going to a moser 31 spline. Once the guy at ford opened the diff cover he was shocked when he saw my gear and pinion. I just took pictures of it yesterday, it now has 18K mile on it and no wear pattern what so ever.

With the mikronite finish I have reduced the friction and heat that builds up. Heat means worst gas mileage.
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Sep 11, 2007
#29
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #29
96GTstang46 said:
OK so iam going to tell everyone this because it seems like some (not all) people dont know how to do math, so i will break it down for you... this is how i see gas prices..

IN the Seattle area
87----$2.75
89----$2.86
92----$2.92

Now, we all have around 15 gallon gas tanks so we will base it off that.

15x 2.75= $41.25 for a tank of 87..

15x 2.92= $43.80 for a tank of 92..

SO when people complain about how much 92 is over 87 it is so dumb to me when you cant pay an extra $2.55 more for a WHOLE TANK of gas and then complain some more about the price of gas???????

Sorry i had to get that out, and iam not trying to be a know it all or a Doushbag or anything.. just trying to open peoples eyes...
Click to expand...


Amen brother...I hate when people do that..they dont really realize how little of a differance it makes..hell..those hybrid cars are pointless too..ive read articles about how it would take like 20 years of buying gas just to make it worth buying a hybrid car over the non hybrid model.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Sep 12, 2007
#30
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • #30
Just did the test....15mpg mostly city
 

2000fordstanggt

Member
Sep 6, 2005
404
1
16
Westland, MI
Sep 13, 2007
#31
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #31
when i had the stock 87 tune i swear if i put 93 in id get noticeably better fuel economy. like it burned slower.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Sep 13, 2007
#32
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #32
2000fordstanggt said:
when i had the stock 87 tune i swear if i put 93 in id get noticeably better fuel economy. like it burned slower.
Click to expand...

It was your imagination
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Sep 17, 2007
#33
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #33
I consistently get 240-250 in the with 80% city driving and have got as high as 380 on a all highway trip going about 75-80 with a fully loaded car (four people, trunk fully loaded with luggage) This translates to about 18-20 mpg in the city and 25-26 on highway and this is using 93 octane from shell
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,538
233
Sep 17, 2007
#34
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #34
Just filled up and I am currently getting 19.82 MPG and I always bring the car to a hundred or more and light the tires a couple times, so I guess I am doing pretty good. If I stay out of it like when I drove it home from Houston the car did 24 mpg the whole way with the cruise set @ 90mph.
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Sep 17, 2007
#35
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #35
damn see I wish cali had there stations setup for 92 or 93 octane the highest is 91
 

DTNODYA

Member
Dec 15, 2005
831
1
16
Sep 17, 2007
#36
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #36
streethorse said:
Its kind of hard to know just how far past E you can go without running
out of gas. Miles per tank is really inaccurate, call me crazy but I always
go with the miles per gallon calculation......
Click to expand...

All you would have to do is take your MPG calculation and then multiply that by how many gallons your tank holds. Would give you a good estimation as to what your total miles on a tank would be.


Or am I
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
350
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
994
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
823
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
S
Need help asap
  • shaggyman65
  • Dec 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
259
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2025
shaggyman65
S
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
260
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?