• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

How fast is my car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhyrlik
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
R

rhyrlik

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
125
0
0
Jul 19, 2009
#1
  • Jul 19, 2009
  • #1
Please tell me. I don't have time to go to the track and people keep asking.

It has 3.90 gears
18x10 Saleen rims with Nitto 555's
and puts down 300 HP / 340 lbs of torque at the rear wheels.

High 12 / Low 13's?
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jul 19, 2009
#2
  • Jul 19, 2009
  • #2
Question - How come it is only putting down 300rwhp? That is very low for a KB 4.6 to lay down.

300rwhp is more than enough to propel into the 12's. If you are able to launch well and you are a good driver I'd say consistent upper 12's, with a possible mid 12. I would say those times would need to be done on drag radials, though. I'd say low 13's for street tires.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jul 19, 2009
#3
  • Jul 19, 2009
  • #3
Faster than mine, seems like everyone's is...

But the only way to know for sure....:Track:

-Will
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Jul 20, 2009
#4
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #4
According to ET calculators, you'd run a 13.2 @ 102.69MPH

You have a KB and are only putting down 300rwhp? Are you running something like 2psi?!
 

lvmustanggt

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
721
0
0
Las Vegas
Jul 20, 2009
#5
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #5
2 psi ?
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,269
367
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jul 20, 2009
#6
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #6
With only 300hp.... I'd say bone stock with a non pullied blower (no heat exchanger) on a safe emissions legal tune.

12.80s at 106 or so I'd guess. Depends on how much suspension and if you have the tires to do it. 300hp isn't anything to laugh at in these cars.
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Jul 20, 2009
#7
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #7
If I spent money on a KB it better be 380-400rwhp I almost make 300 on cams and stock headers.
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
ATL
Jul 20, 2009
#8
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #8
I wouldn't have a blower on a 4.6 unless it was making over 400 at the wheels.
 

BlownStangGT

REPEAT
Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
3,860
6
58
Lancaster, PA
Jul 20, 2009
#9
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #9
I would say 12's no problems....unless traction is the problem...then 13's ....car must be de-tuned for emmisions reason I would guess with those numbers
 
R

rhyrlik

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
125
0
0
Jul 20, 2009
#10
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #10
scupking said:
If I spent money on a KB it better be 380-400rwhp I almost make 300 on cams and stock headers.
Click to expand...

This was my first blower. I didn't want to break anything. I thought that 70 HP would be a huge improvement. I was wrong, especially after installing those Saleen wheels. They are so heavy, it's like they cost the car all that gain. So I got the gears and the car feels nice.

I'll prolly upgrade to 9PSI w/ IC down the road. I drove a 550 HP Mustang several times and I know that 300 is weak. I thought that 550, while fun, is not very practical. You have to be extremely gentle or rubber will burn... all the time, on the street, on the freeway, in your sleep
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,269
367
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jul 20, 2009
#11
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #11
So your only running what, 6 psi or so? If so on an otherwise stock car, I'd say your right on par with an emissions legal safe tune.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 20, 2009
#12
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #12
squeak93 said:
So your only running what, 6 psi or so? If so on an otherwise stock car, I'd say your right on par with an emissions legal safe tune.
Click to expand...

Agreed...most are consumed with the exagerated KB published figures being higher than that, but 300rwhp/340rwtq @ 6psi is about on par giver or take with real world figures.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jul 20, 2009
#13
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #13
I don't like the 'what would I run' threads. Sure, maybe in perfect conditions, with excellent driving, you could run a high 12, but what about the real world, with yourself behind the wheel? It takes a LOT of practice and experience to wring the most from a car, and even on the street you can't get that kind of experience. Everytime I go to the track, I see people with nice combinations running terrible times. Blown mustangs running 14s, GT500s running mid-low 13s ect ect. It just depends so much on your driving ability and the traction of the car.

So sure, tell your buddies your car can run high 12s, but when you get spanked by mid 13s car just because they can drive well, don't cry about it. Go to the track and find out for REAL what your car runs. You'll have a blast. And if you go and only run a 14-something, that's fine too. My first pass at the track was a mid/high 19 @ 65mph, in an 88 hp 4cyl mustang.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 20, 2009
#14
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #14
bhuff30 said:
Everytime I go to the track, I see people with nice combinations running terrible times.
Click to expand...
Watched a brand new Camaro SS running consistent 9.2-9.3 ET's in the 1/8 this weekend. Not that impressed when you considered bone stock '99-up SN95's were running in the 9.4-9.7 range.

I was running 8.3-8.5's in the cat.
 
R

ran260gt

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
365
0
0
Jul 20, 2009
#15
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #15
The thing is , how high is your track ? are you running a drag set up ?

If its a low track and your car can hook you should have no problem getting in the 12`s !
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Jul 20, 2009
#16
  • Jul 20, 2009
  • #16
you can't tell anybody that your car runs a certain time, because you have not run it. It's called bench racing.

You could say something like, "I hope it would run low 13's at around 107-108mph but have no idea because I have never ran it"
 
R

rhyrlik

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
125
0
0
Jul 21, 2009
#17
  • Jul 21, 2009
  • #17
squeak93 said:
So your only running what, 6 psi or so? If so on an otherwise stock car, I'd say your right on par with an emissions legal safe tune.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's 6PSI, but it's not the emissions that are keeping this car down. It's the lack of IC, the high compression, and the ****ty gas they sell in CA. It is amazing that an '04 Cobra with 15 PSI of boost makes close to 600 RWHP without a hint of detonation. Maybe I should get an intercooler.
 
R

rhyrlik

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
125
0
0
Jul 21, 2009
#18
  • Jul 21, 2009
  • #18
ran260gt said:
The thing is , how high is your track ? are you running a drag set up ?

If its a low track and your car can hook you should have no problem getting in the 12`s !
Click to expand...

I'm running a Bullitt rear end with a MM panhard bar and Nitto 555's on 18x10" rims.
 
4

40oz

Member
Jan 9, 2006
499
3
18
Minneapolis
Jul 21, 2009
#19
  • Jul 21, 2009
  • #19
Winters98GT said:
you can't tell anybody that your car runs a certain time, because you have not run it. It's called bench racing.

You could say something like, "I hope it would run low 13's at around 107-108mph but have no idea because I have never ran it"
Click to expand...

^ that's what I'd say

It's a lot harder to run fast times for your combo than most people think. Whatever your car is *theoretically* capable of is irrelevant on a hot humid day against a headwind. A drag strip is sobering reality for many people.
 
R

rhyrlik

Founding Member
Jun 15, 2002
125
0
0
Jul 21, 2009
#20
  • Jul 21, 2009
  • #20
I realize that, however I'm asking in a generally speaking kind of way, not necessarily the ideal scenario. Kinda like my car vs a 97 Camaro.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
674
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?